Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Constitution (Ammendment #3)
South Florida Sun-Sentinel ^ | Friday Oct 27 | South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Posted on 11/04/2006 1:21:41 PM PST by davidosborne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: davidosborne

1-Florida's constitution is far too easy to amend.

2-Most of the amendments on the ballot in recent years have not been constitional issues and did not belong on the ballot.

3-Amending the constitution in Florida should be made MUCH more difficult or you have a state run by referendum (practically mob rule). Non-constitutional issues that end up passing are nearly impossible to rescind.


21 posted on 11/04/2006 4:33:47 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I agree with you on ALL THREE points.... but this is not the answer.... If the legislature did their job, and took up these issues than the people would not need to take the matter into their own hands...... I would rather vote NO on all the issues that are NOT constitutional matters than change the process in any way....


22 posted on 11/04/2006 4:44:35 PM PST by davidosborne (DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
I would rather vote NO on all the issues that are NOT constitutional matters than change the process in any way

That's fine for you or me. But we are not in the majority of the voters that vote on such issues. And, you will note, some of the more ludicrous amendments of recent years got on the ballot (and succeeded) because of the efforts and money of special interest groups originating outside of Florida. They come in with a lot of money and well staffed organizations and push these issues through from A to Z.

When I was living there, I don't care how I felt about the issue or intent of the amendment, if I didn't believe it to be a constitutional issue, I voted against it.

The man/woman marriage issue is most certainly a constitutional issue, in my layman's opinion.

23 posted on 11/04/2006 4:59:28 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Again.. I agree with you on all points.. I spend a lot of time explaining to folks that they should vote NO on certain ammendments that they "agree" with simmply because they are NOT constitutional issues.. some get i5 and some don't... but it does not justify changing the process IMHO...

FReegards,

David

24 posted on 11/04/2006 5:34:48 PM PST by davidosborne (DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

NO


25 posted on 11/04/2006 8:17:12 PM PST by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
SUN-SENTINEL: PROOF THAT EVEN A BLIND SQUIRREL FINDS AN ACORN ONCE IN A WHILE!

I am voting YES on 3...

26 posted on 11/05/2006 3:14:00 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peteram

Isn't the current rule 50% +1 vote? That isn't 51%...


27 posted on 11/05/2006 3:15:05 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson