Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davidosborne
I would rather vote NO on all the issues that are NOT constitutional matters than change the process in any way

That's fine for you or me. But we are not in the majority of the voters that vote on such issues. And, you will note, some of the more ludicrous amendments of recent years got on the ballot (and succeeded) because of the efforts and money of special interest groups originating outside of Florida. They come in with a lot of money and well staffed organizations and push these issues through from A to Z.

When I was living there, I don't care how I felt about the issue or intent of the amendment, if I didn't believe it to be a constitutional issue, I voted against it.

The man/woman marriage issue is most certainly a constitutional issue, in my layman's opinion.

23 posted on 11/04/2006 4:59:28 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s
Again.. I agree with you on all points.. I spend a lot of time explaining to folks that they should vote NO on certain ammendments that they "agree" with simmply because they are NOT constitutional issues.. some get i5 and some don't... but it does not justify changing the process IMHO...

FReegards,

David

24 posted on 11/04/2006 5:34:48 PM PST by davidosborne (DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson