To: jveritas; freema; RaceBannon
It is my belief that this is a preemptive strike by the Times against a larger story coming in the next couple of days, almost a last great act of desperation by the Times to get President Bush before they are totally blown away by something that they are hearing leaks about.
There is no other reason possible why they would come so close to admitting Saddam was even thinking about Nukes much less building one.
329 posted on
11/03/2006 4:21:51 AM PST by
usmcobra
(I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
To: usmcobra
t is my belief that this is a preemptive strike by the Times against a larger story coming in the next couple of days,I agree.
331 posted on
11/03/2006 4:37:11 AM PST by
syriacus
(2002-UK declassified Nuke building docs- http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/04/15/uk.nuclear/)
To: usmcobra
481 posted on
11/03/2006 5:51:48 PM PST by
freema
(Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson