Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas

Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.

That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html

So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.

The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????

Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts

Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .

Also this one

Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 19992001; 2001documents; atomicbomb; degussa; degussafurnaces; enemedia; fmsodocuments; gwbvindicated; iraq; jveritas; mediabbias; newyorktimessucks; notbreakingnews; nuclear; nuclearbomb; nuketheleft; nyt; onfreep; pajamahuddein; pajamapeoplerule; prewardocs; saddam; saddamdocs; saddamnuke; saddamnukes; waronerror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-512 next last
To: Petronski

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly

"Let's Roll"

e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com


161 posted on 11/02/2006 9:50:29 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Perhaps you want to make copies and put them in a secure place.

And please stay safe!

162 posted on 11/02/2006 9:50:56 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ValentinesDay

Thank you, I hope he will consider it on his show.


163 posted on 11/02/2006 9:51:58 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly


e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com


164 posted on 11/02/2006 9:52:45 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

I do not have this information but I will look it up.


165 posted on 11/02/2006 9:53:04 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

I will be careful, thank you for your care my fellow freeper.


166 posted on 11/02/2006 9:53:53 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Thanks...

" Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought "


167 posted on 11/02/2006 9:54:12 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you SOOOooooooo much.
[Before bed bump]


168 posted on 11/02/2006 9:54:56 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Incredible effort. Now all is needed is to springboard from the NYT article and publicize the information you have posted that reveals that Saddam was working on restarting his nuclear program in 2001. This could be the Reps November surpise.


169 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:00 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

jv you are the greatest!! Go get em Cowboy!

Pray for W and The Election


170 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:13 PM PST by bray (Voting for the Rats is a Death Wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; All

Yep.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006265.htm
"Suddenly, the New York Times
is worried about dangerous disclosures"
By Michelle Malkin · November 02, 2006 11:32 PM

===


FREEREPUBLIC.com - KEYWORD: "PREWARDOCS"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs


FREEREPUBLIC.com - KEYWORD: "IRAQ"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=iraq


171 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:27 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
don't forget to add e.d. hills new email address to your list now that she has her own show. She is afraid of no one...

e.d.hill@foxnews.com

and don't forget: Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.

CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly

Let's upset that donkey cart -


172 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:53 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: george76
Here's the headline ...

Bush vindicated! Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought.

173 posted on 11/02/2006 9:59:54 PM PST by TigersEye ("Everywhere I go there's a Predator in tow, life goes on without me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

We need to splash this headline EVERYWHERE on the Internet we can....

"NYTimes Mistakenly Validates Bush's Reasons For Iraq War!"

GOOGLE Bomb, anyone?


174 posted on 11/02/2006 10:00:03 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.
175 posted on 11/02/2006 10:00:38 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Joe, I just gotta know, did your hands get all tingly when you read those documents? You HAD to have known what they meant!

Give us a play by play as you delved into these documents, what were you thinking? What crossed your mind? Clearly these are documents that not only vindicate the Bush Administration, but CLEARLY, CLEARLY state that removing Saddam from power was essential to World Security. How does that make you feel??

I am REALLY curious to know! From you yourself before the press goes and muddles everything up!

Thanks Joe, this Nation is in your DEBT!

Danae
176 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:00 PM PST by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope

YOu post: "If we can somehow get Rush Limbaugh, all of talk radio, the Internet, and Fox News, FRIDAY, then perhaps the story will have a chance to affect the election."

"Let's Roll!"

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly


e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com


177 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:18 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bray

I am just your humble freeper :)


178 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:25 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Danae; jveritas

Special thanks JVERITAS!! And, I hope the Prez calls a Press Conference tomorrow to discuss this. What do you think are the chances of that happening?


179 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:00 PM PST by no dems (Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.

You, or someone, should tell Rush about this.

180 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:45 PM PST by waimea.man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson