JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.

November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

[maine-iac7]

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly

"Let's Roll"

e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com

[tgslTakoma]

Perhaps you want to make copies and put them in a secure place.

And please stay safe!

[jveritas]

Thank you, I hope he will consider it on his show.

[maine-iac7]

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly


e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com

[jveritas]

I do not have this information but I will look it up.

[jveritas]

I will be careful, thank you for your care my fellow freeper.

[george76]

Thanks...

" Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought "

[Route66]

Thank you SOOOooooooo much.
[Before bed bump]

[kabar]

Incredible effort. Now all is needed is to springboard from the NYT article and publicize the information you have posted that reveals that Saddam was working on restarting his nuclear program in 2001. This could be the Reps November surpise.

[bray]

jv you are the greatest!! Go get em Cowboy!

Pray for W and The Election

[Cindy]

Yep.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006265.htm
"Suddenly, the New York Times
is worried about dangerous disclosures"
By Michelle Malkin · November 02, 2006 11:32 PM

===


FREEREPUBLIC.com - KEYWORD: "PREWARDOCS"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs


FREEREPUBLIC.com - KEYWORD: "IRAQ"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=iraq

[maine-iac7]

don't forget to add e.d. hills new email address to your list now that she has her own show. She is afraid of no one...

e.d.hill@foxnews.com

and don't forget: Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.

CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly

Let's upset that donkey cart -

[TigersEye]

Here's the headline ...

Bush vindicated! Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought.

[tcrlaf]

We need to splash this headline EVERYWHERE on the Internet we can....

"NYTimes Mistakenly Validates Bush's Reasons For Iraq War!"

GOOGLE Bomb, anyone?

[jveritas]

I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.

[Danae]

Joe, I just gotta know, did your hands get all tingly when you read those documents? You HAD to have known what they meant!

Give us a play by play as you delved into these documents, what were you thinking? What crossed your mind? Clearly these are documents that not only vindicate the Bush Administration, but CLEARLY, CLEARLY state that removing Saddam from power was essential to World Security. How does that make you feel??

I am REALLY curious to know! From you yourself before the press goes and muddles everything up!

Thanks Joe, this Nation is in your DEBT!

Danae

[maine-iac7]

YOu post: "If we can somehow get Rush Limbaugh, all of talk radio, the Internet, and Fox News, FRIDAY, then perhaps the story will have a chance to affect the election."

"Let's Roll!"

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 tp 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly


e.d.hill@foxnews.com


Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
hardball@msnbc.com
myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
Rush@eibnet.com
Intelligence@senate.gov
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
Pete.King@mail.house.gov
letters@nytimes.com
joe@msnbc.com

[jveritas]

I am just your humble freeper :)

[no dems]

Special thanks JVERITAS!! And, I hope the Prez calls a Press Conference tomorrow to discuss this. What do you think are the chances of that happening?

[waimea.man]

I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.

You, or someone, should tell Rush about this.