Skip to comments.
Not a normal Election
Townhall ^
| 11/02/06
| Bob Tyrrell
Posted on 11/02/2006 5:04:35 AM PST by Molly Pitcher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Molly Pitcher
Made me look up a word, thanks!
psephologist
> Hypernym: sociologist.
Noun
> Hypernym: sociologist.
A sociologist who studies election trends.
> Hypernym: sociologist.
2
posted on
11/02/2006 5:10:37 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I have a theory. God, I hope I am wrong.
Why would George Bush care is he has a "democrat" congress? Personally, I think he's still mad at the conservatives over the amnesty thing.
I think he & Rove are putting on the the fighting-front but really want the Dems to take control for these reasons:
1 = the amnesty legislation that he's ALREADY PROMISED TO MEXICO will slide right on through - no problem baby!
2 = the democrats will stop the funding of the war. He HAS to leave Iraq but it will be the dems fault, not his.
Ok, have at my theory. Tell me I'm wrong because, with all my heart, I want to be wrong on this one.
3
posted on
11/02/2006 5:12:13 AM PST
by
musikman
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Thanks for looking it up for me!
Some good points by Tyrell, for sure.
4
posted on
11/02/2006 5:13:52 AM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.```````````````````````)
To: musikman
How about waiting until November 8, 2006?
5
posted on
11/02/2006 5:14:07 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: musikman
1. Your interpretation of Bush's desire for "amnesty" is simply off the mark. He wants a guest worker program, but he isn't about to lose an election in order to accomplish this.
2. And why is he not about to lose an election? He wants support for the troops and to be able to fnish the job in Iraq. I suggest you listen to the interview posted in Michael Barone's column last week.
The President doesn't lie, and he doesn't allow millions of Republicans to be manipulated into a loss.
I suggest you go take a walk to clear your head.
6
posted on
11/02/2006 5:17:27 AM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.```````````````````````)
To: Miss Marple
I feel better now. I hope you are right. I could think of nothing sweeter than a Repub victory next week.
In the mean time, I doing phone banks for RNC Friday and Sat.
7
posted on
11/02/2006 5:19:31 AM PST
by
musikman
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
pse‧phol‧o‧gy /siˈfɒlədʒi/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[see-fol-uh-jee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation Ânoun the study of elections.
[Origin: 1950Â55; < Gk psêpho(s) pebble + -logy; so called from the Athenian custom of casting votes by means of pebbles]Or in this era - stones.
8
posted on
11/02/2006 5:21:08 AM PST
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: Miss Marple; musikman
1. Your interpretation of Bush's desire for "amnesty" is simply off the mark. He wants a guest worker program, but he isn't about to lose an election in order to accomplish this.That's only half of his proposal, as you well know. The other part is his demand for "a path to citizenship" which, as we all know, is a form of amnesty.
9
posted on
11/02/2006 5:23:15 AM PST
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: Molly Pitcher
We hear a lot about how midterm elections turn out "historically".
There is one thing we must think about. We are in the 21st Century with internet and other speed of light communications apparatus. One cannot predict elections any longer from a historical standpoint.
A Freeper brought down Dan Rather and Company in '04. A blogger exposed Kerry's "botched joke". Is it safe to say that history is changing?
10
posted on
11/02/2006 5:29:10 AM PST
by
no dems
(Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
To: no dems
Another thing that no one seems to factor into elections is 9/11.
The media may have the luxury of "sweeping it under the rug" but it is SEARED into the hearts and minds of every American. I think it will effect elections (subconsciously) for years to come.
11
posted on
11/02/2006 5:32:26 AM PST
by
musikman
To: musikman
12
posted on
11/02/2006 5:35:55 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: Miss Marple
The President doesn't lie... I'm afraid you've lost me there. Lying is part of a president's job, and you can be certain that every good president does it. The only questions are why are the lies told, and to whom?
13
posted on
11/02/2006 5:36:49 AM PST
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Oberon
Haven't you ever noticed how the President occasionally changes the subject, refuses to answer, etc.? Nope, no lies. He may not tell you everything, but he is known for not lying.
14
posted on
11/02/2006 5:41:58 AM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.```````````````````````)
To: Molly Pitcher
This is also not a normal election because Hillary and company want to make sure they are setting the groundwork for '08. In order for Hillary to win, she will need a corrupt Democrat controlled House and Senate to setup the '08 election for the most corrupt elections in the history of our country.
We need to begin to stop her by voting on Tuesday.
15
posted on
11/02/2006 5:42:41 AM PST
by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: musikman
President Bush does not want a democrat congress.
It's the democrats that want to impeach him. The president truly wants to win in Iraq. I saw him on FoxNews campaigning real hard for a republican in Perry, GA (incidentally Sam Nunn's hometown) the other day.
Think it through, and don't be stuck on that fence situation.
16
posted on
11/02/2006 5:47:49 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: TommyDale
17
posted on
11/02/2006 5:48:15 AM PST
by
musikman
To: Preachin'
Oh, I'm not on any fence. I am an RNC volunteer, a republican fighter and, as a matter of fact, a true Mayflower descendant... I will vote straight R's on Tuesday.
But, I just have this feeling about Bush and Mexico. Can't shake it.
18
posted on
11/02/2006 5:50:28 AM PST
by
musikman
To: musikman
I am sure you are a true conservative.
Just don't let yourself think that the president wants to lose the congress to take himself off the hook with the Latinos (i.e., the guest worker and border fence).
19
posted on
11/02/2006 5:53:34 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: musikman
This President is the last man on earth who would betray the troops by wishing for dem control of either house.
You are wrong wrong wrong.
20
posted on
11/02/2006 5:56:44 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(JOHN F. KERRY, BETRAYING OUR TROOPS AGAIN)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson