Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing hosts its biggest diplomatic party as it joins scramble for Africa
The Times ^ | November 2, 2006 | Jane Macartney

Posted on 11/01/2006 3:35:08 PM PST by MadIvan

China aims to make new friends and show the West that it is a force to be reckoned with

Chinese tour guides are brushing up their Swahili, most cars have been ordered off Beijing streets and officials have been told to cycle to work. Hotel chefs have created African menus, the flags of African nations fly over Tiananmen Square and the airport highway has been closed to everyone but African leaders arriving for the largest diplomatic gathering the Chinese capital has seen.

The Beijing summit runs over the weekend with as many as 48 of the heads of Africa’s 53 countries in attendance. It will be a landmark in the foreign policy of the country most likely to become a new superpower. It is not insignificant that China — which calls itself the world’s biggest developing nation — is eager to give prominence to its relations with the largest bloc of developing countries.

The summit is not only an opportunity for China to nurture its ties with countries that are becoming among its most important sources of raw materials to feed its industrial boom. It is also a chance to underline the view of itself as the closest and most reliable friend to the Third World and to show the West that its diplomacy makes it a force to be reckoned with.

This is no longer the Cold War age, when Beijing sought “anti-imperialist” friendships in Africa to counter the United States and its allies. This time cold, hard business will be at the root of whatever statements on strategic partnership and mutual trust emerge on Sunday. Trade deals are the main incentive behind the slogan “Friendship, Peace, Co-operation and Development” that has appeared on billboards across Beijing.

Reductions in tariffs, more aid and training programmes and possibly debt forgiveness will also be on the agenda.

China’s trade with Africa ballooned to $40 billion (£21 billion) last year from $5 billion a decade earlier. Trade soared 30 per cent and is expected to grow by at least 25 per cent this year to more than $50 billion. Angola has overtaken Saudi Arabia as China’s largest supplier of oil and African oil now accounts for one third of total imports.

Africa’s natural resources are attracting Chinese investment across the continent: phosphates from Morocco, copper and cobalt from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia, iron ore and platinum from South Africa, timber from Cameroon and Gabon and cotton for China’s textile plants.

China is interested not only in minerals; it also wants more diplomatic partners — specifically the five African countries that recognise Taiwan as the government of China. Beijing has invited representatives of Gambia, Malawi, Burkina Faso, Swaziland and São Tomé to attend the summit as observers, clearly with the aim of persuading them that they have more to gain by switching recognition to Beijing and away from an island that China regards as a renegade province.

While officials do not yet know how many, if any, of the five will send representatives, any who do attend are certain to be offered financial incentives to switch sides. Taiwan gives medical aid and infrastructure assistance to diplomatic partners but does not reveal the amounts. Oil-rich Chad was the latest country to switch, recognising Beijing in August and becoming the sixth country to change allegiance since 2000.

China has rolled out a red carpet for the visitors and more than a million police and volunteers will maintain security. Posters of elephants, giraffes and zebras with the slogan “Africa — the land of Myth and Miracle” line city streets; conference centres have been carpeted with grass. Hoardings show a black hand and a yellow hand clasped or touching fingers. However, one false note was struck on a billboard displaying huge photographs of tribesmen with painted faces and a curved bone piercing their noses — only these were from Papua New Guinea.

It is unlikely to harm China’s prospects in Africa, even though there have been murmurings in some countries that the Chinese buy their resources and sell light industrial goods without regard for African economies. Paul Wolfowitz, the President of the World Bank, accused China recently of disregarding social and environmental standards when lending to developing nations in Africa.

China has defended its scramble for Africa. Wei Jianguo, the Vice-Minister for Commerce, said that its soft loans and investments were “like sending firewood in the snow”. Chinese products were better suited to African consumer needs, he said. “Chinese investments have greatly benefited the local people and have been popular among them.”

Zimbabwe has been a big beneficiary, with Beijing funding a new university department that will offer Chinese language and culture courses. In June Harare announced a $1.3 billion deal with China to set up coalmines and three thermal power stations. As President Mugabe said shortly before leaving for the summit: “We have nothing to lose but our imperialist chains.”

Critics say China’s dealing with countries with poor human rights records, such as Sudan, and its principle of non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs could jeopardise the long-term benefits of its investments. And it is far from certain that when China builds a railway or a stadium it will also transfer technology to African countries.

China rejects the criticisms, emphasising that its help comes with no strings attached — unlike Western countries or the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Wen Heping, an Africa expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said: “China wants them to boast of sustainable development. Western countries are interested only in resources. To give them aid is not to put cash in the pockets of a few presidents.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; africawatch; china; zimbabwe
Uh oh.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 11/01/2006 3:35:10 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 11/01/2006 3:35:37 PM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Doing "business" with Africa will suck dry Chinese coffers in exchange for...nothing.


3 posted on 11/01/2006 3:37:30 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Its China's turn to spend billions on Foreign Aid.


4 posted on 11/01/2006 3:46:22 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft (Can't think of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Works for me. Hasn't won us any friends there, anyway.


5 posted on 11/01/2006 3:47:47 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
China's willing to sign trade and development deals with African dictators with no questions asked.As long as China gets the oil or minerals they want,they couldn't care less how many of the country's citizens have been imprisoned,tortured or murdered by said dictator.

Yet another of the 120,000 reasons why one should avoid the "made in China" label when they shop.

6 posted on 11/01/2006 4:01:04 PM PST by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I understand that Zimbabwe has ordered it's many University students to learn MANDARIN --I think it's a compulsory subject, in fact.

Oh, I'm sure they'll just eat it right up...along with tree bark soup...

7 posted on 11/01/2006 5:16:03 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Africa has huge natural resources that will prove vital in the near and far future.


8 posted on 11/01/2006 5:17:37 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Africa has oil and uranium, sure, but natural resources are the curse of the black continent. They empower corruption by offering the lure of fast, easy money rather than encouraging the establishment of domestic infrastructure, manufacturing, rule of law, and education.

As such, Africa's endemic corruption places a vast, hidden tax on its natural resources.

Let China pay it.


9 posted on 11/01/2006 5:35:53 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Africa also has a ton (okay, millions of tons) of things like rare earth metals, such as coltran, which is vital to cell phones and video games and advanced electronics. Semi-precious stones, precious stones, rare woods, etc. etc.

A lot of folks are flocking there now from Europe and the U.S. some of the countries are real gold rush style boom towns though the press never covers it.


10 posted on 11/01/2006 5:58:37 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
I understand that Zimbabwe has ordered it's many University students to learn MANDARIN --I think it's a compulsory subject, in fact.

A lot of African languages are tonal, Mandarin will be easy to learn then.
11 posted on 11/01/2006 10:41:52 PM PST by diesel00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Africa has oil and uranium, sure, but natural resources are the curse of the black continent. They empower corruption by offering the lure of fast, easy money rather than encouraging the establishment of domestic infrastructure, manufacturing, rule of law, and education.

Are the Chinese in Africa writing checks or are they building roads, dams, factories and schools there? If they are doing the former, then I say g'luck to the Chinese because they are going to need it. If they are building infrastructure (which is what a lot of the papers are saying), then the question that must be asked is why? I read from another British paper that the doors of buildings that the Chinese construct in Africa are all designed for the average height of the Chinese (5'8" male). Makes you wonder if one day we will see the African equivalent of Singapore spring up somewhere in Africa.
12 posted on 11/01/2006 10:53:51 PM PST by diesel00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson