Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest WSJ/Zogby Polls Raise More Questions Than They Answer
usnews.com ^ | Posted 10/31/06 | By Steve Coogan

Posted on 11/01/2006 10:51:01 AM PST by excludethis

Political Wire looks at the Wall Street Journal/Zogby Interactive polls, which show "Democrats taking the lead in two races and have a very good chance at taking control of the Senate after next week's elections."

But some of the results seem to run counter to many other independent polls. While the latest round shows Democratic challenger Jim Webb leading Republican Sen. George Allen in Virginia – something three other polls, including CNN's, have found in the last 24 hours – it also shows Democratic challenger Sherrod Brown's lead over Republican Sen. Mike DeWine falling to just two percentage points in Ohio, a result unlike every other poll.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/01/2006 10:51:04 AM PST by excludethis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Voters vs. Zogby: a once-golden pollster is tarnished (Nov 29, 2004)


2 posted on 11/01/2006 10:55:12 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Anything Zogby is involved in is skewed to the dems. No wonder it doesn't make any sense.


3 posted on 11/01/2006 10:55:24 AM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Most likely they oversampled Democrats, i.e., cooked the poll.


4 posted on 11/01/2006 10:55:29 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

uH oh...I thought the dems were winning in a landslide.
More like a mudslide.


5 posted on 11/01/2006 10:55:48 AM PST by LB4BUSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Now another poll showing Webb ahead...that is a real worry....


6 posted on 11/01/2006 10:58:23 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Here's the election slipping through their hands...


7 posted on 11/01/2006 10:58:24 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

I don't believe for a minute the pedophile will win in Virginia. This is more B.S. from a Democratic shill, Zogby.


8 posted on 11/01/2006 10:59:20 AM PST by MikeA (Not voting Nov. 7 because you're pouting is PRECISELY what Speaker Wannabe Pelosi wants you to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Interactive=Internet=NOT SCIENTIFIC!

LLS


9 posted on 11/01/2006 10:59:37 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

It really depends on how they are polling and where they are drawing sample from. If they call 1,000 people in NVA then those results will differ to those of a Richmond area poll or down in Norfolk.


10 posted on 11/01/2006 11:02:53 AM PST by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

I suspect that none of the polls have any meaning in light of the current Kerry debacle.

Perhaps we'll have a better read Friday/Monday.


11 posted on 11/01/2006 11:05:07 AM PST by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

12 posted on 11/01/2006 11:05:20 AM PST by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Look, there was a poll posted today at free republic with Allen up 3. But, screw the polls. They're all guesstimates made by liberals who want their guy to win.


13 posted on 11/01/2006 11:06:26 AM PST by jsmaineconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Another poll just recently has Allen up....so thank goodness, there are differing results here.

Also, the undecided leaners tend to be leaning toward Allen according to Roanoke College's poll.


14 posted on 11/01/2006 11:08:17 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Just remember, the Wall Street Journal 'news division', which is associated with Zogby in this poll (and NBC in other polls), is further left than all other MSM. The far left 'news division' of WSJ is often confused with the 'editorial division', which is decidedly conservative. They are two different entities.
---
A Measure of Media Bias

by Tim Groseclose, Department of Political Science, UCLA and Jeff Milyo, Department of Economics, University of Missouri

December 2004

"One surprise is the Wall Street Journal, which we find as the most liberal of all 20 news outlets. We should first remind readers that this estimate (as well as all other newspaper estimates) refers only to the news of the Wall Street Journal; we omitted all data that came from its editorial page. If we included data from the editorial page, surely it would appear more conservative.

Second, some anecdotal evidence agrees with our result. For instance, Reed Irvine and Cliff Kincaid (2001) note that “The Journal has had a long-standing separation between its conservative editorial pages and its liberal news pages.” Paul Sperry, in an article titled the “Myth of the Conservative Wall Street Journal,” notes that the news division of the Journal sometimes calls the editorial division “Nazis.” “Fact is,” Sperry writes, “the Journal’s news and editorial departments are as politically polarized as North and South Korea.”[24]

Third, a recent poll from the Pew Research Center indicates that a greater percentage of Democrats, 29%, say they trust the Journal than do Republicans, 23%. Importantly, the question did not say “the news division at the Wall Street Journal.” If it had, Democrats surely would have said they trusted the Journal even more, and Republicans even less.[25]

Finally, and perhaps most important, a scholarly study—by Lott and Hasset (2004)—gives evidence that is consistent with our result. As far as we are aware this is the only other study that examines the political bias of the news pages of the Wall Street Journal. Of the ten major newspapers that it examines, the study estimates the Wall Street Journal as the second-most liberal.[26] Only Newsday is more liberal, and the Journal is substantially more liberal than the New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, and USA Today."


http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.8.htm


15 posted on 11/01/2006 11:15:12 AM PST by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Have they factored in this? Sclerotic old woodpulp media.


16 posted on 11/01/2006 11:24:27 AM PST by NaughtiusMaximus (Let's all be Magnificent Bastards. Turn out those Republican votes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson