Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia can build anti-asteroid systems if necessary – official
Itar-Tass ^ | 24.10.2006

Posted on 11/01/2006 7:26:28 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Virginia Ridgerunner

UK and France and China et al had to "lend a hand" because the US and USSR missiles together were not powerful enough........Remember the scene where all the missiles came together and were headed enmasse to the target?...........


21 posted on 11/01/2006 7:55:07 AM PST by Red Badger (ECCLESIASTES 10 The heart of the wise inclines to the RIGHT, but the heart of the fool to the LEFT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Yes, but this was a movie produced when people still didn't have much of a clue as to exactly how ICBMs did what hey did........


22 posted on 11/01/2006 7:56:29 AM PST by Red Badger (ECCLESIASTES 10 The heart of the wise inclines to the RIGHT, but the heart of the fool to the LEFT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

To kill the rogue spaceship(I am assuming it is probably the Argelians) you have to cruise at light speed around the entire universe and as soon as you reenter you shoot in the general direction.

The Argelians aren't the most intelligent beings. They will drive the ship right into the blast. As a side note. That's 100 points.


23 posted on 11/01/2006 7:59:06 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Obama in 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
>Russia can build anti-asteroid systems

Gross Domestic Product ($million)
-----------------------------------------
...
12     India     775,410
13     Mexico     768,437
14     Russia     766,180

24 posted on 11/01/2006 8:00:45 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


25 posted on 11/01/2006 8:10:59 AM PST by presidio9 (Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Its worse that that. Russia's GDP per capita is less than 6K, as opposed to 40+K for the US, 37+K for the UK


26 posted on 11/01/2006 8:11:40 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Its worse that that. Russia's GDP per capita is less than 6K, as opposed to 40+K for the US, 37+K for the UK

According to the CIA World Factbook the GDP per capita for Russia is $11,100. (2005)

The GDP per capita in the US is $41,800. (2005)
The GDP per capita in the UK is $30,300. (2005)
27 posted on 11/01/2006 8:29:25 AM PST by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

One kilometer is nearly the ideal size of asteroid to consider for space mining. Space mining would be an excellent way to dispose of these hazards.


28 posted on 11/01/2006 8:31:51 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Dr. Bill Wattenberg, the nuclear scientist who has a science talk show on KGO, one night discussed this. It was his opinion that the US should be developing an anti-asteroid ability, and if memory serves correctly, he suggested using some of our orbiting space junk to collide with the asteroid. I thought it made a lot of sense. And obviously uses existing technology. Don't know why the Russians are making such a big deal out of this.


29 posted on 11/01/2006 8:36:36 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
“The Russian missile industry is capable of manufacturing anti-asteroid systems if necessary,a space based weapons platform”

There, fixed it.

30 posted on 11/01/2006 8:38:54 AM PST by WorkerbeeCitizen (Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
using some of our orbiting space junk to collide with the asteroid

Position and momentum say this approach would be nearly zero effectiveness. Like being sure to wear a helmet when riding a bike into a bridge abutment at 700 mph.

31 posted on 11/01/2006 8:39:57 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Of no doubt in charge Ministry of Emergency Situations will be.

(For fun paste "Ministry of Emergency Situations " into Google, some site are actually readable)

Example
The Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus (MES) is a state agency, exercising control and management in the sphere of prevention and elimination of natural and man-made emergency situations and fire safety.


32 posted on 11/01/2006 8:44:14 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
I find this to be very difficult to believe.

To deflect the asteroid with relatively small force you need to do it much earlier at the earlier pass near the Earth. Attach the rocket booster to the asteroid, fire in the well calculated direction and this should introduce significant deviation after long time.

33 posted on 11/01/2006 8:51:39 AM PST by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! Bazaar Akbar! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I had asteroids once. They really hurt.


34 posted on 11/01/2006 8:53:05 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Best place to deflect is not where it approaches closely but when it is farthest. If deflected at the nearest point it will still come back to that point, and maybe sooner.


35 posted on 11/01/2006 8:56:17 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Wouldn't missiles that don't need Oxygen to breath work in space ?

The burning of the fuel isn't the issue. They don't have enough thrust to leave orbit, nor the quantity of fuel to do so. You need an orbiting system, or else nukes on a Saturn V.

36 posted on 11/01/2006 9:02:11 AM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

The place to preposition is in solar orbit. That is, beyond earth orbit. If several systems are prepositioned one of them would be able to move to intercept a surprise asteroid fairly quickly. If in earth orbit they would just as likely be on the wrong side of the solar system and on top of that still have to carry excess tons of fuel for earth escape.


37 posted on 11/01/2006 9:09:57 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; All
>Best place to deflect is...

No one's paranoid
enough in this thread! Just think--
the technology

to deflect asteroids
AWAY from the earth ALSO
could deflect asteroids

TOWARD the earth. Do we
want governments (anyone's!)
to have this option?

38 posted on 11/01/2006 12:11:19 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Same reason we don't seem to be having many nuclear wars (so far). The survivors will have to live here.


39 posted on 11/01/2006 12:16:27 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson