To: SJackson
"I wasn't a tomboy or a geek. I wasn't ugly or fat or disgusting. " So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian. Sorry, lost all credibility right there.
4 posted on
11/01/2006 4:43:05 AM PST by
chaos_5
To: chaos_5
"So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian."
Get real. What a lame post.
10 posted on
11/01/2006 4:51:06 AM PST by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: chaos_5
"So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian. Sorry, lost all credibility right there."Huh? Sounds like you are trying to do to her what the lesbian did, twist her words to suit your needs.
12 posted on
11/01/2006 4:55:54 AM PST by
Hatteras
To: chaos_5; L98Fiero; Hatteras
Perhaps she's saying that that was her image of lesbians at the time. Remember, this was before ponytails & baseball caps & Melissa Etheridge. ;>)
So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian.
22 posted on
11/01/2006 5:08:26 AM PST by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: chaos_5
I don't get that at all -- I get that she didn't date much, but the reason had nothing to do with how attractive/unattractive she was.
To: chaos_5
So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian. Sorry, lost all credibility right there.Good God. Did you even read the article?
44 posted on
11/01/2006 5:49:26 AM PST by
Future Snake Eater
(The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
To: chaos_5
Not really. That is what the 'conventional wisdom' was back them regarding lesbianism. It still persists today, in an older generation where I live, anyway. There are those who 'assume' because you're single, over 35 with no kids that you MUST be a lesbian. Has it happened to me? You bet. I just feel sorry for people who want to put others into simple defined boxes so they can understand the world better.
50 posted on
11/01/2006 6:09:08 AM PST by
rintense
(Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
To: chaos_5
So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian. Sorry, lost all credibility right there. You should be worried about your own credibility: the article says nothing of the sort.
60 posted on
11/01/2006 6:38:11 AM PST by
r9etb
To: chaos_5
"So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian."
I didn't see that at all. I got that she was relatively normal looking and still couldn't attract males --- and she was looking at the common reasons (wrong reasons, IMHO, but pretty women certainly have an advantage in this regard) women blame on not being able to find a mate.
69 posted on
11/01/2006 7:13:09 AM PST by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: chaos_5
I think you misread that a little bit. ;)
To: chaos_5
90 posted on
11/01/2006 9:01:02 AM PST by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: chaos_5
"So she is saying that any girl who fits the above description cant get a guy, and therefor becomes a lesbian. Sorry, lost all credibility right there."
Nooooooooo I believe she said "can become" there is a big difference. She didn't, but had the opportunity to. ANY shy young person can, I pray they don't. She was a wallflower, a late bloomer. And her message here is a good one.
96 posted on
11/01/2006 9:35:58 AM PST by
gidget7
(Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson