Posted on 10/28/2006 11:50:34 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
I've always known there was something wrong with Michael Savage's schtick. It's intolerable. He talks like an absolute madman. He is just about as intemperate as you can get and still be on the radio.
Now I know what was wrong. The whole thing is a put-on:
Supporting a candidate out of your own wallet may be the most accurate gauge of what a donor believes in his heart. So it should come as a shock to fans to learn where their hero distributes his own political gifts. Which are not ungenerous. Just ask Jerry Brown, the decidedly liberal candidate (pro-abortion, pro-gun control, etc.) for California attorney general.
As the San Francisco Chronicle reports, Savage is a top contributor to Brown's campaign against conservative state senator Chuck Poochigian. His gift of $5,600, the maximum allowable under state law, was merited, Savage told the Chronicle after being outed. Why? Because "You have to make choices in an imperfect world."
RIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGHHHTTTTT.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
I apologize for double-teaming you, that is an ilk trait which I detest.
Now you're admitting you're a stalker. Get a life.
Your "ILK PING LIST" sounds REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT.
Zzzzzzzz.............
"GOT ILK?"
Whining is detestable too.
I'm glad you finished Imaginary Reading 101.
I wonder sometimes the same thing.gamming? sometimes it seems like it.
There-there little one. If you don't stop throwing your tantrums, you'll be in for another timeout.
You pinged me, senor? Still looking for some disruption? Perhaps you can get this telling thread demoted to chat. It is a revealing thread in how people here at FR do exactly as Savage is accused of doing. The supposition is that SF Savage is a California Ilk, just like you herd members.
Can you imagine the comments tasteless people would make?
"Can you imagine the comments tasteless people would make?"
People can say what ever they want.
What is your point?
Man, I've always wondered if they guy was a "mole". No conservative is that angry, it is almost antithetic. He's rabid, Gloria Steinem rabid.Not to mention he's always trying to erode support and faith in conservative leadership (as if that is difficult).
"Good thing the ol' A&M radio has a smart feller on it to provide you with opinions."
If that's what you think happens, no wonder you're a dumb-ass. Opinions are one thing, but to comment without listening is rude and ignorant.
I was just being a drama queen...
ROTFLMAO
Thank You so much! I do enjoy his stchick (spelling?) though. Your parady was purrfect!
The guy makes me laugh. I vote straight GOP every time. He's right though, the GOP is as spineless as it has always been. We have never had the kinda powerful speakers the Libs and Dem have had to push our message. (Except the great one, - Rush!)
Are they personal friends? If they are personal friends he may have donated out of the friendship.
Just and idea, I don't like Savage anyway, but do we know his reasoning or just flinging accusations?
Your wrong! I listened to Rush when he first started in Sacramento. I was from L.A. I had never hear of conservetives and never knew what one believed. I knew I believed what Rush was saying and he gave me the confidence to change my registration from Dem to GOP. I helped many others too.
I thank God for Rush and used to pray for him often.
Almost 600 replies: you won't see that on a SAVAGE LIVE THREAD!
So you reckon I shouldn't comment about things I dislike?
Wow. What a concept. You're a genious.
Wow, the mind can rationalize any BS, as illustrated by your condemnation of Rush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.