1 posted on
10/27/2006 10:33:16 AM PDT by
Mia T
To: Mia T
This is New York, where they would vote for a pumpkin if it had "D" beside it.
2 posted on
10/27/2006 10:34:38 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
To: jla
3 posted on
10/27/2006 10:35:49 AM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Think that's bad?
Wait till you hear what she's for.
4 posted on
10/27/2006 10:36:57 AM PDT by
CBart95
To: Mia T
Is it not interesting that when it suits the Dims, they tell us that a 17 year old 'child' can be taken advantage of, be manipulated, because they are still not yet mature enough to make correct decisions. For instance, being molested by a priest or a Republican congressman.
But, a 14 year old girl IS mature enough to make a decision concerning a medical procedure that could cause her severe harm (both physically and mentally) and will kill a baby.
Is it not interesting that Dims are constantly harping on parents getting more involved in their childrens lives, like when they defend teachers and the NEA against any responsibility for failing schools and kids.
Yet, when it comes to a serious medical procedure on a parents under age child, they are telling the parents it is none of your business, that the government knows best.
7 posted on
10/27/2006 10:39:25 AM PDT by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: Mia T
It take a Village to steal your children.
10 posted on
10/27/2006 10:43:45 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Mia T
Hillary's position on no notify is not new and can probably be traced back to her tenure as staff attorney and then head of Childrens Defense Fund
14 posted on
10/27/2006 10:48:19 AM PDT by
stylin19a
("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
To: Mia T
Of course Hillary Rodham is opposed to parental notification.
In her Marxist eyes, these are matters for the "village" collective to decide.
If most Democrats knew what Hillary has in mind for them and their families and their Country, they would abandon Hillary in the flash of an FBI file.
.
19 posted on
10/27/2006 10:53:47 AM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Mia T
21 posted on
10/27/2006 10:59:40 AM PDT by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: Mia T
Not surprised at all Hillary is in favor of enabling all adult males to impregnate all the underage females they can find.
She's definitely a trashy person.
22 posted on
10/27/2006 11:00:39 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Mia T
Compelling and moving image.
I'm glad to see you take on an issue such as this, Mia. I am very proud of you.
35 posted on
10/27/2006 11:25:12 AM PDT by
jla
To: Mia T
God bless America make Hillary go away.
To: All
This will probably get her more votes from the west side..
58 posted on
10/28/2006 5:43:43 AM PDT by
newnhdad
(All your government branches are belong to us!! not for long if this cr@p keeps up.)
To: joanie-f; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; ...
tweaked image + movie ping
Inserted a more direct appeal for the 'yes' vote for Prop 85 in CA and the 'no' vote for hillary clinton in NY.
Please feel free to use in emails and posts.
60 posted on
10/28/2006 9:16:47 AM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Even if you put the morality of the act aside, a parent needs to know the physiological condition of his/her child in order to best care for that child.
BTW...I think a 16-year-old still has to have a parent's written permission to get a tattoo.
63 posted on
10/28/2006 9:43:34 AM PDT by
bannie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson