Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Even if you put the morality of the act aside, a parent needs to know the physiological condition of his/her child in order to best care for that child.

BTW...I think a 16-year-old still has to have a parent's written permission to get a tattoo.
63 posted on 10/28/2006 9:43:34 AM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bannie

Absolutely. It may be unconstitutional; but it's definitely insane.
The dystopian harbinger of the hillary jackboot.


64 posted on 10/28/2006 9:58:46 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
BTW...I think a 16-year-old still has to have a parent's written permission to get a tattoo.

Varying by state, there are regulations prohibiting children under 14 from using tanning beds. Arizona, Illinois and Ohio require parental permission for anyone under 18 and the trend is growing.

Tatoos, bad for children. Suntans, bad for children. Abortion, no restrictions, at any cost.

Why is abortion so popular with these people?

66 posted on 10/28/2006 11:19:24 AM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson