Skip to comments.
ALERT! N.Y. VOTERS!! HILLARY CLINTON AGAINST NOTIFYING PARENTS WHEN UNDERAGE DAUGHTER SEEKS ABORTION
hillary clinton, Bill O'Reilly, John Spencer, ABC, FoxNews
| 10.27.06
| Mia T
Posted on 10/27/2006 10:33:04 AM PDT by Mia T
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2006 10:33:16 AM PDT
by
Mia T
To: Mia T
This is New York, where they would vote for a pumpkin if it had "D" beside it.
2
posted on
10/27/2006 10:34:38 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
To: jla
3
posted on
10/27/2006 10:35:49 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Think that's bad?
Wait till you hear what she's for.
4
posted on
10/27/2006 10:36:57 AM PDT
by
CBart95
To: Gail Wynand
They took the village.... ping
5
posted on
10/27/2006 10:37:27 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Perdogg
Alberto Gonzales ruled in favor of not informing the parents when he was in Texas. Liberals!!!!!!!
6
posted on
10/27/2006 10:37:37 AM PDT
by
texastoo
("trash the treaties")
To: Mia T
Is it not interesting that when it suits the Dims, they tell us that a 17 year old 'child' can be taken advantage of, be manipulated, because they are still not yet mature enough to make correct decisions. For instance, being molested by a priest or a Republican congressman.
But, a 14 year old girl IS mature enough to make a decision concerning a medical procedure that could cause her severe harm (both physically and mentally) and will kill a baby.
Is it not interesting that Dims are constantly harping on parents getting more involved in their childrens lives, like when they defend teachers and the NEA against any responsibility for failing schools and kids.
Yet, when it comes to a serious medical procedure on a parents under age child, they are telling the parents it is none of your business, that the government knows best.
7
posted on
10/27/2006 10:39:25 AM PDT
by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...
8
posted on
10/27/2006 10:40:28 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: technomage
9
posted on
10/27/2006 10:43:35 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
It take a Village to steal your children.
10
posted on
10/27/2006 10:43:45 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Mia T
Mia, thanks as always for the ping.
11
posted on
10/27/2006 10:46:20 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
To: bmwcyle
12
posted on
10/27/2006 10:46:27 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: OKSooner
You're quite welcome, OKSooner. :)
13
posted on
10/27/2006 10:47:56 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Hillary's position on no notify is not new and can probably be traced back to her tenure as staff attorney and then head of Childrens Defense Fund
14
posted on
10/27/2006 10:48:19 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
To: Perdogg
Thats right. Forget notification...I'm pretty sure most people in NYC would prefer that they give out abortions free in the public high school health services offices.
15
posted on
10/27/2006 10:48:38 AM PDT
by
tcostell
(MOLON LABE)
To: CBart95
She is now for gay marriage. NEWSFLASH! HER POSITION HAS "EVOLVED".
16
posted on
10/27/2006 10:48:47 AM PDT
by
juliej
To: texastoo
Which is why he was not nominated for the Supreme Court - got it?
17
posted on
10/27/2006 10:49:47 AM PDT
by
juliej
To: juliej
For every 1 gay vote she picked up, she lost 10.
And she's trampled on the Dem reps that were being boosted by taking an anti-gay marriage stance.
Think her endorsement was a big screw-up...especially since Bubba signed the Defense of Marriage Act...AND the "don't ask, don't tell" script.
18
posted on
10/27/2006 10:53:47 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Mia T
Of course Hillary Rodham is opposed to parental notification.
In her Marxist eyes, these are matters for the "village" collective to decide.
If most Democrats knew what Hillary has in mind for them and their families and their Country, they would abandon Hillary in the flash of an FBI file.
.
19
posted on
10/27/2006 10:53:47 AM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: juliej
There is no evolution she creates her opinion.
20
posted on
10/27/2006 10:54:26 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson