Skip to comments.
Research discovers oldest bee, evolutionary link
Eurekalert ^
| 25-Oct-2006
| David Stauth
Posted on 10/26/2006 3:17:58 PM PDT by Boxen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
And here's the photograph:

1
posted on
10/26/2006 3:17:59 PM PDT
by
Boxen
To: Boxen; LibertarianInExile; JoeSixPack1; Joe 6-pack; hispanarepublicana; yoe; Yaelle; writer33; ...
2
posted on
10/26/2006 3:29:07 PM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Boxen
3
posted on
10/26/2006 3:31:43 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Boxen
100 million years ago? Why are there still bees then? Or worms? Or single-cell amoebas? Shouldn't they have evolved into birds, or dogs, or elephants, or whatever by now? It's all nonsense.
4
posted on
10/26/2006 3:34:54 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Boxen
5
posted on
10/26/2006 3:40:38 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Love God, despise religeon.)
To: Rennes Templar
What's yellow and black, and goes zub-zub-zub?
A 100 million year old bee flying backwards.
6
posted on
10/26/2006 3:48:05 PM PDT
by
elcid1970
To: Boxen
The specimen, at least 35-45 million years older than any other known bee fossilYou ever wonder how they come up with these numbers? Do they sit at a table having coffee and say I think it should be "x" years and then they have a vote?
7
posted on
10/26/2006 3:55:57 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: Boxen
Fascinating stuff.. great post!
8
posted on
10/26/2006 3:58:33 PM PDT
by
somniferum
(Annoy a liberal.. Work hard and be happy.)
To: Jaysun
100 million years ago? Why are there still bees then? Or worms? Or single-cell amoebas? Shouldn't they have evolved into birds, or dogs, or elephants, or whatever by now? It's all nonsense. You had me going for a minute there. You really ought to include a /sarcasm tag, otherwise folks will get the idea you're a complete idiot.
9
posted on
10/26/2006 4:02:29 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
To: taxesareforever
You ever wonder how they come up with these numbers? Do they sit at a table having coffee and say I think it should be "x" years and then they have a vote? There are a number of dating methods used to date these finds -- each accurate to a greater or lesser degree. We'll have to read the paper to determine the methods used (they usually use more than one to eliminate any errors).
Instead of being sarcastic, you might do a little research on dating methods. That way, next time you spout off at least you might know something about which you speak.
10
posted on
10/26/2006 4:07:08 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
To: Junior
You had me going for a minute there. You really ought to include a /sarcasm tag, otherwise folks will get the idea you're a complete idiot.
Right Junior. Only "smart" folks allow "scientist" to build complete skeletons out of a single pig's tooth or a skullcap and call it "intelligent" or "proof". You can kiss my tail-fin, sir.
By the way, you forgot to answer the question. Why are there still worms? Moths? Fish? Turtles? Birds? Monkeys? Frogs? After all, didn't they have to "evolve" to survive?
11
posted on
10/26/2006 4:11:13 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Jaysun
By the way, you forgot to answer the question. Why are there still worms? Moths? Fish? Turtles? Birds? Monkeys? Frogs? After all, didn't they have to "evolve" to survive? That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans?
The two groups split, and each went its own way.
At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.
12
posted on
10/26/2006 4:25:03 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans? The two groups split, and each went its own way.
At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.
No. Worms, fish, turtles, birds, giraffes. We're talking apples and oranges here (which, by the way must have come from fish - or is it apes). No, you're trying to dodge the question. Europeans and Americans are very much alike. Americans and worms are very different than say, Europeans and dirt. Thanks for reply, but it doesn't hold muster.
13
posted on
10/26/2006 4:33:46 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Boxen
Biggest bug I ever saw was a praying mantis. Must have been a foot tall, green. When it took off it flew right at me and I had to duck.
14
posted on
10/26/2006 4:37:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Jaysun
Which scientist built a complete skeleton from a skullcap or pig's tooth. Be specific now, as we wouldn't want folks to think you were just making stuff up.
As for why there are still worms, etc., those critters are specifically adapted for their particular ecological niches. Part of evolution is adaptation to an environment.
15
posted on
10/26/2006 4:42:46 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
To: Junior
As for why there are still worms, etc., those critters are specifically adapted for their particular ecological niches. Part of evolution is adaptation to an environment.
That part is stupid on its face. Why aren't worms secluded to the one place that they could survive? And if they could survive anywhere, why evolve? As to the other part, give me a minute.....
16
posted on
10/26/2006 4:45:34 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Jaysun
No. Worms, fish, turtles, birds, giraffes. We're talking apples and oranges here (which, by the way must have come from fish - or is it apes). No, you're trying to dodge the question. Europeans and Americans are very much alike. Americans and worms are very different than say, Europeans and dirt. Thanks for reply, but it doesn't hold muster. I am not trying to dodge the question, because it is the same. My training happens to be more in the fields of fossil man and bones than worms and turtles, so that is what I used in my answer.
(My guess from the tone of your questions is that you don't agree with evolution for some reason. I don't think you really want an answer to your question.)
17
posted on
10/26/2006 4:49:24 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Junior
Which scientist built a complete skeleton from a skullcap or pig's tooth. Be specific now, as we wouldn't want folks to think you were just making stuff up.
Pigs tooth = "Nebraska man".
Skullcap = "Java man", initially discovered by Eugene Dubois, a Dutchman, in 1891.
18
posted on
10/26/2006 4:50:00 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Coyoteman
I am not trying to dodge the question, because it is the same. My training happens to be more in the fields of fossil man and bones than worms and turtles, so that is what I used in my answer.
Sir, Europeans and Americans are the same species. We can, and often do, breed. Can you not see the difference between that and say, birds and butterflies (both of which fly and sometimes display beautiful colors)?
19
posted on
10/26/2006 4:51:48 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: Jaysun
Worms aren't everywhere, though they are in a lot of environments. Note that not all worms are identical. There are 5500 species of earthworms in the world alone. There are dozens of other types of worms, with thousands of different species, inhabiting environments ranging from the sea floor to the leaf mould of northern forests. And each of those species is specifically adapted for its environment.
20
posted on
10/26/2006 4:54:32 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson