Skip to comments.
Rights Group Fires Publisher of Foley E-Mail
NYT ^
| 25 Oct 2006
| DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Posted on 10/26/2006 2:23:45 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Notwithstanding
What? Gays don't like gay bashing?
2
posted on
10/26/2006 2:24:50 AM PDT
by
dyed_in_the_wool
("O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends" - Koran 5.51)
To: Notwithstanding
they don't like the negative light on them
meaning they don't like getting caught
3
posted on
10/26/2006 2:38:49 AM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: Notwithstanding
Snow Job
cover up
Scapegoat!
I'm sure this story was about to break and their trying cover their butts.
4
posted on
10/26/2006 2:51:00 AM PDT
by
blues_guitarist
(I noticed citgo is advertising on FNC now . ... . .BOYCOTT CITGO!!)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: blues_guitarist
Calling the Gay Mailers Bluff
One blog site that has been tracking the SSP site, warns that if HRC doesnt come clean about its role in this Republican gay outing campaign, it will be exposed on Friday: Open letter to Joe Solmonese: It is your responsibility to rid the HRC of the SSP gang. It is important for you to do so; doing nothing is connivance.When I started this pursuit (or stumbled in), I knew nothing of the HRC or its mission. I am now thoroughly aware of how many people rely on the HRC to forward the rights of the LGBT community. Underhanded tactics of a few not only tarnish the organization but also its mission. If you do not act, I will. Friday is your deadline or I name names.gtl Update: So whos calling? The MSM (main stream media), thats who.
To: Notwithstanding
7
posted on
10/26/2006 2:57:34 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
To: Notwithstanding
Keep in mind that the "Stop Sex Predators" blog began last JULY. The WHOLE purpose of that blog wasn't to stop Sex Predators but ONLY to expose Mark Foley and damage Republicans.
8
posted on
10/26/2006 3:01:01 AM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: Dallas59
9
posted on
10/26/2006 3:03:31 AM PDT
by
SIDENET
(Is it too early for flapjacks?)
To: sure_fine
10
posted on
10/26/2006 3:08:03 AM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: Dallas59
"One blog site that has been tracking the SSP site, warns that if HRC doesnt come clean about its role in this Republican gay outing campaign, it will be exposed on Friday: "
What does this have to do with Hillary Rodham Clinton?
11
posted on
10/26/2006 3:41:12 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Obama in 08)
To: Notwithstanding
12
posted on
10/26/2006 3:44:47 AM PDT
by
BTCM
(Death and destruction is the only treaty Muslims comprehend.)
To: Notwithstanding
From the article at the source:
The rights campaigns spokesman, David Smith, said the employee, whose name he declined to disclose, was a junior staff member hired last month to help mobilize the organizations members in Michigan. The minute we learned about it we took decisive action, Mr. Smith said.
Why isn't the so-called "Human Rights Campaign" naming this clown? Why are they protecting this person? Why doesn't the Al-Qaeda times press for the name of this person?
13
posted on
10/26/2006 4:08:27 AM PDT
by
dbehsman
(No more Wellstone memorials! I've had enough!)
To: Dallas59
PING FOR THAT LATER
HHAHAHAHA
To: dbehsman
There would be shreiking and wall to wall 24/7 coverage if a conservative activist had done the same thing.
I am so glad my kids are not in gubment schools and are exposed mostly to the new media outlets ratehr than the drive by media outlets.
To: EllenZ
"More likely that even some gays have a problem with an older man soliciting a minor."
You know, I'd like to think you're right. But as much as I don't care to legislate against homosexual deviance, I am starting to think their silence on this whole Foley thing is about approval of Foley's actions. Seems to me the first thing that any gay group would have to do to achieve mainstream acceptance would be to disavow a guy like Foley, who was basically sexually harassing kids...I'm not sure if ANY of them have.
16
posted on
10/26/2006 5:28:55 AM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
(When personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders, Foley happens.)
To: penelopesire
To: Dallas59
18
posted on
10/26/2006 5:33:08 AM PDT
by
YourAdHere
(Buy "Bradypalooza" at Amazon.Com.)
To: EllenZ
"More likely that even some gays have a problem with an older man soliciting a minor."If it wasn't for NAMBLA I might even believe you.
To: Notwithstanding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson