Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New HBO Movie: Hacking Democracy
HBO Films ^ | 10/23/06 | HBO Documentary

Posted on 10/23/2006 8:06:35 AM PDT by cwb

"Electronic voting machines count 80% of the votes cast in America today. But are they reliable? Are they safe from tampering? From a current congressional hearing to persistent media reports that suggest misuse of data and even outright fraud, concerns over the integrity of electronic voting are growing by the day. And if the voting process is not secure, neither is America's democracy....

In 2002, Seattle grandmother and writer Bev Harris asked officials in her county why they had acquired electronic touch screen systems for their elections. Unsatisfied with their explanation, she set out to learn about electronic voting machines on her own. In the course of her research, which unearthed hundreds of reported incidents of mishandled voting information, Harris stumbled across an "online library" of the Diebold Corporation - which counted more than 40 percent of the presidential votes nationwide in 2000 - discovering a treasure trove of information about the inner-workings of the company's voting system...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: grandmother; hackingdemocracy; mediabias; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
This movie doesn't premier on HBO until November 2nd (what a coincidence), but with Bev Harris playing a starring role, I can only imagine the objectivity that will be on display. The preview ended with a clip of Bush smiling saying everythings great, portraying the same confidence that the MSM now finds peculiar in light of recent polls (possibly suggesting he knows the fix is in). Below are a list of the contributors to the movie if anyone has any insight into their political affiliations.

HACKING DEMOCRACY was directed by Simon Ardizzone and Russell Michaels; produced by Simon Ardizzone, Robert Carrillo Cohen and Russell Michaels; executive producers, Earl Katz, Sarah Teale and Sian Edwards; edited by Sasha Zik. For HBO: supervising producer, John Hoffman; executive producer, Sheila Nevins.

1 posted on 10/23/2006 8:06:36 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cwb; PJ-Comix; Charles Henrickson; franksolich

Bev Harris plays a starring role?


2 posted on 10/23/2006 8:09:41 AM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb; PJ-Comix
In 2002, Seattle grandmother and writer Bev Harris asked officials in her county why they had acquired electronic touch screen systems for their elections...

And now, you're only $10 away from knowing the truth?

3 posted on 10/23/2006 8:10:50 AM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb

Further evidence the liberals/Dems will grasp at almost anything before engaging in any healthy re-consideration of their own faults. That said - I think I would feel better with hard-copy ballots, but wasn't it the Dem's whining over the 2000 Florida melee that has driven us to the electronic systems?


4 posted on 10/23/2006 8:11:22 AM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb
Geez, everyone KNOWS that manual ballots and hand counting are completely safe, fool proof, and error free. Why change?
5 posted on 10/23/2006 8:13:43 AM PDT by TankerKC (Step Back! Doors Closing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghost of nixon

Yes it was, but I believe these machines should have a paper trail or other audit system.
Of course, if the Dems win then the machines are just fine.


6 posted on 10/23/2006 8:14:17 AM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cwb

The Organized left trashed our tried and true voting system to advance their own purposes in Florida in 2000. Now THEY are the ones complaining about the results.

It's time to go back to reliable and verifiable punch cards. Yes, They were reliable. It's only when the ballots are picked, poked, and abused that problems arise.


7 posted on 10/23/2006 8:14:26 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb

Remember that we only have these machines because the "Florida election was stolen". Remember the hanging chad? Remember Holocaust victims voting for Buchanan, which we were told is impossible? The only acceptable voting system to Dems is one with only their candidates listed, and a ballot given to everyone who shows up, however many times they do.


8 posted on 10/23/2006 8:15:17 AM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb

Compared to the very real REJECTION OF MILITARY BALLOTS, MULTIPLE PUNCHING OF VOTING CARDS (ever wonder what causes all these damn chads? Punch reams of paper to find out), REGISTRATION OF PETS, THE DECEASED, AND FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, DISTRIBUTING NARCOTICS FOR VOTES, INTENTIONAL ACTS OF VIOLENCE TO SUPPRESS VOTER TURNOUT, AND THE EARLY DECLARATION OF A WINNER WHEN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IS STILL IN PROGRESS, this crockumentary amounts to nothing more than a hill of bull turds.

Hey HBO, I got an idea for a movie, we could have all of the above and simply title it "Dems: The Political Fraud Enterprise".

Any takers?


9 posted on 10/23/2006 8:16:05 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb
I'm sure I'll get a lot sicker of all this ballot B.S. as election time nears.

But you will never hear that it was Democrats who are too stupid to operate a punch-ballot that brought us electronic voting!

10 posted on 10/23/2006 8:18:11 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Right and there will be absolutely NO Mention Of any voting
machines .There is only Black disenfranchisement when the Democrats lose ,no lawsuits either the lawyers will slither back to their holes


11 posted on 10/23/2006 8:19:59 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cwb

Nothing but a DNC campaign ad aired less than a week before the election.


12 posted on 10/23/2006 8:20:54 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

I think we need to adopt "A" system which can not be hacked by one person.

The problem with the current e voting is that ONE person can do this.

It ads new meaning to the term "hold back precinct."


13 posted on 10/23/2006 8:23:48 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I don't know exactly how much of a starring role she plays, but it appears they rely on a lot of her so-called investigation for much of their conclusions throughout the film. We'll see on Nov. 2nd


14 posted on 10/23/2006 8:24:03 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cwb
http://evm2003.sourceforge.net/

Open Vote Consortium has already created the "standard" for how electronic voting should be conducted.

It is a rather simple process:
Voter checks in and is verified
Voter proceeds to a ballot generation station where they:
- select their language / impairment support if needed
- select their candidates
- receive a print out of their choices that includes a security hash of their choices and the machine that generated the choice and their sequence number on the machine. This security code can not be reversed to extract the above in formation. The other included item is a bar code that indicates their choices.

Voter then moves to the ballot confirmation and counting machine. This machine reads the bar code and displays the choices as how the vote will be recorded if approved by the voter. If the voter approves, the ballot is recorded and the PAPER AUDIT TRAIL is then put into the ballot box.

When voting is done, the PRELIMINARY vote is dialed in to the central computer via data line over an encrypted tunnel. That night, election judges will then open each paper ballot audit box and using a different scanning machine, scan each vote into a second counting machine. if the totals match, then the PRELIMINARY vote is altered to CONFIRMED. If the vote count does not match, then the vote count is REJECTED and a manual count is required.

Other security means are used to prevent tampering electronically with the ballot generation or counting. Use of keyed hyper visor program control, runtime CPU hash calculations, source code published for all to review and a hash generated of the executable, dual key hard drive encryption (one key generated by one party and the second key generated by the other party) would make the task of hacking a single voting machine VERY complex and VERY difficult. L
15 posted on 10/23/2006 8:26:18 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwb
...but it appears they rely on a lot of her so-called investigation for much of their conclusions throughout the film.

Yeah, that's how I understood your words. Has she not yet been discredited with sufficient thoroughness?

Maybe HBO bought themselves a pig in a poke, or maybe they don't care about her meager veracity because she makes the point they want to make.

16 posted on 10/23/2006 8:26:24 AM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

How about the NY pull lever machines.

They have a tendency to have a mechanical failure in punching a hold for the Republican candidate.


17 posted on 10/23/2006 8:27:22 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Ironic, isn't it? The Dems whined and complained about the disenfranchisement of minorities because of antiquated equipment. Now that everybody's adopting the computer systems, they're crying foul over this. There was nothing wrong with the old system other than the Dems lost and needed an excuse to blame someone/thing.


18 posted on 10/23/2006 8:29:24 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cwb

It's only cheating if the Republicans do it, right HBO? I'm glad I don't get HBO.


19 posted on 10/23/2006 8:30:01 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

"Nothing but a DNC campaign ad aired less than a week before the election."

This could actually work in our favor. If liberals think that their votes won't be counted and that the system is rigged, they will be more likely to stay home.


20 posted on 10/23/2006 8:30:40 AM PDT by BadAndy (You want a magic bullet to fix your problem, but I only have hollowpoints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson