Posted on 10/21/2006 10:54:23 PM PDT by rajuchor
Judge Tosses Case When Muslim Refuses to Unmask in Court
The promoters of Islamic misogyny are not only active in Europe; theyre continually testing the strength of American society too: Muslim woman refuses to remove her veil in court, so judge tosses case. (Hat tip: LSD.)
And again, we see mainstream media (the Detroit Free Press) running interference for the Council on American Islamic Relations.
DETROIT - Ginnnah Muhammad of Detroit was looking for her day in court.
Instead, she said she felt as if a judge forced her to choose between her case and her religion in a small-claims dispute in Hamtramck District Court.
A devout Muslim, she wore a niqab - a scarf and veil to cover her face and head except for her eyes - Oct. 11 as she contested a rental car companys charging her $2,750 to repair a vehicle after thieves broke into it.
Judge Paul Paruk said he needed to see her face to judge her truthfulness and gave Muhammad, 42, a choice: take off the veil when testifying or the case would be dismissed. She kept the veil on.
I just feel so sad, Muhammad said last week. I feel that the court is there for justice for us. I didnt feel like the court recognized me as a person that needed justice. I just feel I cant trust the court. ...
In metro Detroit, which has one of the countrys largest Muslim populations, a small minority of Muslim women - primarily those of Yemeni descent - wear the niqab, said Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Paruk said that as a fact finder, he needs to see the face of a person testifying. Michigan has no rules governing what judges can do regarding religious attire of people in court, so the judges have leeway on how to run their courtrooms.
My job in the courtroom is to make a determination as to the veracity of somebodys claim, he said. Part of that, you need to identify the witness and you need to look at the witness and watch how they testify.
Paruk said he offered to let Muhammad, who was born in the United States and converted to Islam at the age of 10, wear the veil during the proceedings except when she testified. He said this was the first time someone had come before his court wearing a niqab, and he noted that many Muslims do not consider it a religious symbol.
I felt I was trying to accommodate her as best I could, he said.
Walid said Paruk still violated Muhammads civil rights.
They lost this one, but theyll be back.
HAR! Great post.
She wanted special rules for herself!!!
I have this thought that all these American women who are 'recent converts' to Islam just want an excuse to wear a veil to cover up an ugly mug. Just a thought.
Some states do...it was used as a tool against the KKK.
Way to go Australia! These people have no business immigrating to a country in which they will not follow the local laws and customs. If they want their own laws, they should go back home.
Bump!
The Class of 2004.
She's wearing the gloves, too, I see. Is this Arabic or a type of Black Muslim? There's a black woman who dresses like this, everything covered and wearing gloves, on my bus sometimes. It's freaky; like a big black hole in space. I know she's black because I saw her standing at the bus stop once and she had her arm outstreteched, you could see a bit of her wrist above the glove.
If she's American, she needs to get her mind right and throw off this slave-wear. If she's Yemeni, maybe she needs to go back home.
I'm completely in favor of this judge's actions. One has the right to face one's accuser. The whole freaking face, not just the eyes. It's getting harder and harder to be charitable towards these people.
"clear off" --- I like the sound of 'f#$% off' better...
Facing your accuser ... hard to do when screened.
As the Judge, I would have fined her for Contempt of Court, so her consequence would have been not only having to pay for the insurance costs, but also suffer the additional cost of a fine...
We need a law that says you cannot wear garb in public that covers your face. .... Actually, there are many,,,, depending on state.
What is a woman who follows shar'ia law doing renting a car and filing a lawsuit on her own?
A law banning all religious headdress in all govt and school buildings would go far towards stopping muslim extremism. The moderates would be relieved and the extremists would move back to their hideous failed societies.
No one should be driving covered in a full facial bag. Women wearing the bag should not be driving according to Saudi Arabia.
Wimp!
I sure am glad the Feminists are so vocal about the evil Islam inflicts on women. < /sarcasm>
what was she doing renting a car?
muslim women aren't allowed to drive according to their precious religion
Well of course the court didn't recognize you as a person, you have all that cloth over your face, nobody could recognize you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.