Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/21/2006 3:13:37 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: West Coast Conservative

I think this is the first report I've seen that doesn't just assume that GOP voters are going to stay home in large numbers.


282 posted on 10/22/2006 4:10:44 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

The dims cannot tell the nation's voters how THEY FEEL on any issue.

So why oh why do we need to let them tell US how WE FEEL on issues?

They are clueless loozas. I don't buy a damn thing the losing lamestream media "tells us" anymore. Nothing. Vote the rats out, it's Prozac and Jack Daniels time for them already.


283 posted on 10/22/2006 4:13:09 AM PDT by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

Now deprived of her "rightful position" Speaker Pelosi was unavailable for comment...

284 posted on 10/22/2006 4:15:51 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; jan in Colorado
Who cares about this article? All that matters are the votes in November!


Oops...that's what we're supposed to say when we don't like the article!

285 posted on 10/22/2006 4:27:57 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

In this land of political punditry, is there anyone who keeps score? To wit, there are true prophets and false prophets. Various groups give congressmen/senators ratings from 1% to 99% supportive of our position, so why not a rating service on CNN and others who predict certain election outcomes? Thus when they make their AUTHORITATIVE predictions you can immediately see their batting average by going to a website and its ratings for said pundit.


287 posted on 10/22/2006 4:38:06 AM PDT by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

Sweet!


288 posted on 10/22/2006 5:03:29 AM PDT by GOPJ (:Every Muslim hero, including Mohammed, has been a mass murderer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

     ​​​​​Election 2004: Congress


.

.

George Washington University Battleground Poll conducted by the Tarrance Group (R) and Lake Snell Perry & Associates (D). Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2004. N=1,000 likely voters nationwide. (Rolling sample, as of 9/13/04.) MoE ± 3.1.

.

". . . If the election for Congress were being held today, and you had to make a choice, would you be voting for the Republican candidate or the Democratic candidate in your district?" If undecided: "And which party's candidate do you lean toward at this time?" Options rotated

.

Republican Democrat Unsure
% % %
10/31 - 11/1/04 47 44 9
10/27-28 & 31/04 46 43 11
10/25-28/04 44 44 12
10/18-21/04 42 46 12
10/11-14/04 40 44 16
10/4-7/04 42 43 15
9/27-30/04 42 46 12
9/20-23/04 43 44 13
9/13-16/04 41 45 14

.

8/15-17/04 43 46 11
6/20-23/04 41 49 11
3/28-31/04 39 46 14
9/03 42 43 15 ​​​​​

 

CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll. Oct. 29-31, 2004. N=1,866 registered voters nationwide (MoE ± 3); 1,573 likely voters (MoE ± 3).

.

"If the elections for Congress were being held today, which party's candidate would you vote for in your congressional district: the Democratic Party's candidate or the Republican Party's candidate?" If undecided: "As of today, do you lean more toward the Democratic Party's candidate or the Republican Party's candidate?" Options rotated. In 10/29-31/04 poll, respondents who had already voted were asked which party's candidate they voted for.

.

Republican Democrat Other (vol.)/
Undecided
% % %

.

Among likely voters:

10/29-31/04

47 48 5

10/22-24/04

50 47 3

9/3-5/04

48 46 6

7/30 - 8/1/04

47 47 6
1/04 50 45 5

.

Among registered voters:

10/29-31/04

45 49 6

10/22-24/04

47 49 4

9/3-5/04

44 48 8

7/30 - 8/1/04

44 49 7
1/04 46 45 9
11/03 47 46 7

 

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). Oct. 29-31, 2004. N=1,014 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.1.

.

"What is your preference for the outcome of the upcoming congressional elections: a Congress controlled by Republicans or a Congress controlled by Democrats?"

.

Republicans Democrats Unsure    
% % %    

Among likely voters:

10/29-31/04 43 44 13    
10/16-18/04 44 44 12    

.

Trend, among registered voters:

9/17-19/04 42 46 12    
9/17-19/04 42 46 12    
6/25-28/04 42 44 14    
5/1-3/04 41 44 15    
3/6-8/04 42 45 13    

.

Among ALL adults:

1/04 42 43 15    
12/03 42 42 16    

 

Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Oct. 27-29, 2004. N=1,005 registered voters nationwide (MoE ± 4); 882 likely voters (MoE ± 4).

.

"If the election for U.S. CONGRESS were being held TODAY, would you vote for the Republican Party's candidate or the Democratic Party's candidate for Congress in your district?" If "Other" or "Undecided": "As of TODAY, do you LEAN more toward the Republican or the Democrat?" Options rotated

.

Republican Democrat Other (vol.)/
Undecided

.

% % %

.

Among likely voters:
10/27-29/04 49 44 7

.

10/21-22/04 47 46 7

.

10/14-15/04 46 44 10

.

.

Among registered voters:
10/27-29/04 46 45 9

.

10/21-22/04 45 45 10

.

10/14-15/04 43 46 11

.

7/29-30/04 41 51 8

.

3/18-19/04 42 49 9

.


 

Democracy Corps Poll conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (D). Oct. 26-28, 2004. N=1,503 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 2.5.

.

"Again, thinking about the elections in November, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate in your district where you live?"

.

Republican Democrat Other
(vol.)
Not
Sure
% % % %
10/26-28/04 45 48 1 5
10/26-27/04 45 47 2 6
10/24-25/04 42 51 1 6
10/20-21/04 44 49 1 6
10/17-18/04 46 48 1 5
10/14-16/04 45 49 1 5
10/10-11/04 45 48 1 6
10/3-5/04 45 49 1 6
10/3-5/04 45 49 1 6
9/26-28/04 46 47 2 5
9/19-21/04 45 48 1 6
9/12-14/04 44 48 1 7
9/6-9/04 45 46 2 7
8/2-5/04 41 51 2 6
7/10-13/04 42 49 1 8
6/14-17/04 44 48 1 8
5/10-13/04 44 46 1 9
4/19-22/04 45 47 0 8
3/16-21/04 45 47 1 7
2/10-15/04 42 49 0 8
1/13-18/04 43 48 1 9
10/03 42 48 1 9
9/03 42 47 1 11
8/03 39 45 1 15
7/03 45 44 2 10
6/03 44 43 1 11
5/03 45 43 1 11
1/03 43 44 1 11

 

Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted by Ipsos-Public Affairs. Oct. 18-20, 2004. N=1,330 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 2.5.

.

"And if the election for Congress were held today, would you want to see the Republicans or Democrats win control of Congress?"

.

Republicans Democrats Neither
(vol.)
Not
Sure
% % % %
Among likely voters:
10/18-20/04 46 47 4 3
10/4-6/04 44 48 5 3
9/20-22/04 49 46 3 2
9/7-9/04 49 46 3 2

.

Trend, among registered voters:

9/7-9/04 47 45 5 3
8/3-5/04 44 48 6

289 posted on 10/22/2006 5:07:04 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

Pat B on the Mclaughlin Group the other day:

"The GOP WILL LOSE the House"

LOL!


296 posted on 10/22/2006 6:49:59 AM PDT by Disturbin (Get back to work -- millions of people on welfare are counting on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative
Pardon our hubris, but we just don't see it.

I think it's all just a democrat wet dream, too. People will vote as they always have.
We'll keep both the House and Senate. The media created fantasy is just that - a fantasy.

307 posted on 10/22/2006 10:21:15 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

The Democrats are doing in this election what they do in every election. The mainstream media is used relentlessly in the weeks leading up to an election to "predict" a disastrous downfall for the Republicans. The idea is to use the media to brainwash conservatives into thinking that it is a waste of time to go out and vote. And with an incumbent Republican President sitting in the White House there's always going to be plenty of stuff for them to throw mud at. This would be the case even if 9/11 had never happened, if Iraq never happened, and if Mark Foley were a paragon of virtue. I'm amazed that more R's haven't figured this out. If they do pull off a victory, even a slim one, the sleeze party will accuse them of voter fraud.


317 posted on 10/22/2006 3:38:51 PM PDT by Cookie123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

I hope all the Moonbats don't hear about this. The longer they grasp their delusions of a DemocRat sweep, the greater the meltdown will be the following Wednesday.


323 posted on 10/22/2006 4:38:05 PM PDT by Nasher (GO BUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

I hope this is what happens and not just wishful thinking.


335 posted on 10/22/2006 9:37:39 PM PDT by BLS (If you were blind you wouldn't be guilty, but you are guilty because you claim you can see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Don't forget that a big part of the RAT media's intent here is not only to try and sway the election, but to also allege that it was rigged when the RATS don't win.

All these simple minded idiots are going to say, "hey, we heard all these polls saying the RATs were going to trounced, so Bush must have stolen another election."


337 posted on 10/22/2006 9:57:17 PM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

This is nice...but it only means that every eligible vote MUST go out and VOTE on Election Day to ensure that the GOP retains it's majority. Prove Barron's correct by VOTING!!!


340 posted on 10/23/2006 7:03:52 AM PDT by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I was talking to my brother-in-law, chuxster s, and it came down to the same thing:

They have used this same tactic in 2000, it didn't work.
They have used this same tactic in 2002, it didn't work.
They have used this same tactic in 2004, it didn't work.

why would it work now? wishful thinking? that and a dollar will buy you a bag of chips, but it won't win you any elections.

341 posted on 10/23/2006 7:45:36 AM PDT by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (Those who will not fight for life or liberty deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative

Ok, but Barron's hasn't predicted anything correctly in 20 years.


356 posted on 10/23/2006 1:39:07 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: West Coast Conservative
I wonder if they finally surveyed, by party, who is registered and who claims they are likely to vote in this election? I've not seen that little number.
368 posted on 10/24/2006 2:57:09 PM PDT by samm1148 (Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson