Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats' agenda found! (Fake Pollgasms linked to Rats' electile dysfunction -- study)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, October 21, 2006 | Ron Strom

Posted on 10/21/2006 12:06:25 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Lurker

Yeah, there's going to be one hell of a civil war between the MoveOn moonbats and the more-'moderate' 'Rats.


21 posted on 10/21/2006 8:02:01 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

ping for a good rant


22 posted on 10/21/2006 8:13:10 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

This is so encouraging .. and right in line with what I believed before I even read it.

The "silent majority" will strike again and the dems will not know what hit them.

However, I do believe that after the dems lose this election they will visit endless hell upon America for being so stupid for not voting for them.


23 posted on 10/21/2006 10:11:50 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Another keeper, John!!!


24 posted on 10/21/2006 10:22:57 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

bump for later reading


25 posted on 10/21/2006 11:03:29 AM PDT by albee (The best thing you can do for the poor is.....not be one of them. - Eric Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
electile dysfunction ?!!

Charged with pumping up the 'Rat turnout, Moonbat election workers are hogging down Viagra and coffee in hopes of a last-minute spurt.

26 posted on 10/21/2006 11:21:47 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

A good day for a little historical reflection. Thanks, John.


27 posted on 10/21/2006 11:26:26 AM PDT by Brasil ( "It is a struggle FOR civilization." W 9-11-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

bttt


28 posted on 10/21/2006 11:31:57 AM PDT by votelife (we need 60 conservative senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I heard most of your posted article read by Mark Levin on his radio show Thursday. It's good to remind people that Zogby in particular does not have a particularly good track record in forecasting mid-term elections, not at least in 2002. Could it be because Zogby's brother is a highly-placed Democratic Party official?

For what it's worth, though, Zogby - now polling as a partner of The Wall Street Journal - came out with a summary of his recent Senate polling only Thursday, which largely contradicts what we've been hearing from other MSM polling entities. If all current leaders were to hold onto their leads, according to Zogby himself, the GOP will wind up with 54 Senate seats in the next Congress - a net loss of only one.

29 posted on 10/21/2006 4:50:32 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

JohnHuang2, your old friend, Defender2 here.

Go to the link below, once there, go to reply #28, once there click the link it contains.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723311/posts

Proof Positive why the DemocRATS Cannot be trusted with the Defense of the Country!!!!

D2


30 posted on 10/21/2006 4:53:24 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

From your keyboard to God's ears! Keep praying make sure to vote, FReepers!


31 posted on 10/21/2006 5:59:54 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Outstanding!!! Your post has been linked here!

Thanks!

32 posted on 10/21/2006 8:21:03 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

And the Democrats will lose one, to Leiberman. That'll make it 54-44-2. Bad new for Democrats, 10 seats behind in the Senate.


33 posted on 10/21/2006 11:23:11 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Funniest thing I've read in weeks. Absolutely first rate. This deserves a much wider audience.


34 posted on 10/21/2006 11:35:03 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Let's be realistic. Count the two so-called "independents" in the projected new Senate - Lieberman and Sanders - as 'Rats. So the tag "independent" is a mere formality, as it has been for Jeffords since his jump.

However, Lieberman would be expected to vote as a conservative Democrat on the WOT and Iraq. On the other hand, there would still be a few RINOS there whose votes are iffy in quite a number of areas.

Still, the bottom line is that the GOP will most likely maintain organizational control of the Senate.

35 posted on 10/22/2006 3:43:09 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

Yes..you are corect, sir! LOL...but he can't beat macaca, can he?


36 posted on 10/22/2006 4:03:38 AM PDT by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler

"Republicans are divided and unmotivated. That is why we are volunteering staggering amounts of time and money. Clearly the Democrat message of cowardice and anti-Americanism is resonating with disaffected conservatives. We are doomed."

No...don't believe the libnutmedia rotgut they are spewing. Here's why: for six years I've begged/pleaded and posted all over the place trying to find out HOW DIMS feel about any issue. Answer: they won't say. My point is, if the DIMS can't tell US how they FEEL on any issue, why are you allowing THEM to tell US how we feel?

Think about that. They have ZIP, nada, nothing. All they have is a pack of lies and BS. Stop buying into it. VOTE GOP and shut them down.

And drop the negativity...no need to panic. No one in their right mind is going to allow the dims to wrest Congressional control away from the GOP.


37 posted on 10/22/2006 4:09:01 AM PDT by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Yes they would retain organizational control. But with the Democratic Party having lost 2 seats because they ate their own favorite sons via the primary system, it is no assurance that the Democrats - even if they got 49 seats - could assure that the 2 independents would hand them control. The party failed these 2 Senators, letting the fringes take control of the primaries, only to lose the general election to the people the party should have supported.

What I am saying is not only is that party a mess, there is no assurance that the two independents wouldn't want to deliver some payback.


38 posted on 10/22/2006 1:30:46 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
As I said, the two projected "independents" will be independent in name only. It's virtually certain that they will announce their formal allignment with the Dem caucus, so for practical purposes consider them as Dems.

I don't see Lieberman as being anything other than he has been in the Senate up until now; he will vote with the 'Rats the large majority of the time, but might support the Bush administration occasionally on foreign policy matters. In other words, no discernable revenge factor. He'll count his blessings to be reelected and move on as if almost nothing happened.

39 posted on 10/22/2006 3:56:13 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: goresalooza
And drop the negativity...no need to panic.

I didn't think my sarcasm was so subtle as to require a sarcasm taq.

40 posted on 10/22/2006 3:59:21 PM PDT by Once-Ler (The rat 06 election platform will be a promise to impeach the President if they win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson