[ProtectOurFreedom]

This doesn't make any sense. Why in the world was source code at the State Board of Elections? If the state needed to certify the security measures at the source level, then Diebold would have required it be performed in secure facilities in a Diebold building. This smells more like an insider at Diebold sending out the source.

Is this the end for electronic voting?

[ecomcon]

Track it down, and we will find Democrat operatives involved.

[Weep-o-crat Hunter]

Some tratoros scum at the company! Its no good to let this code out to the MMM - itll turn into the wrong kind of story. What if the code is how to win elections???

[Hendrix]

It all boils down to this people. The democrats have a much harder time stuffing ballot boxes with the computer system than they do with punch cards and the other more primitive voting systems, so the democrats want to discredit the computer system so that they can go back to the old system which is much easier to cheat with. It is as simple as that.

[Pete]

On the face of it, this seems like insurance in case the Dems lose so they can claim voter fraud.

Maryland already has enough problems with precinct judges showing up.

[right-wingin_It]

ping

[WesternPacific]

..you are a credible person who can save the state from itself.

Sounds like self promotion

[NeoCaveman]

From the producers of the DaVinci code comes the blockbuster thrill ride of the year.

Starring Will Rivers Pit, Bev Harris, and Karl Rove as an albino Jesuit.

Coming this November from Twenty First Century Farce

The Diebold Code.

[Mannaggia l'America]

Cheryl C. Kagan, a longtime critic of Maryland's elections chief, says the fact that the computer disks were sent to her - along with an unsigned note criticizing the management of the state elections board - demonstrates that Maryland's voting system faces grave security threats.

Check it for fingerprints. Compare to members of CREW and you may just get match...

[backhoe]

Crosslinked to The Vote Fraud Archives: ( Click the picture )

[Vicomte13]

This is precisely why there MUST be a paper record of electronic voting. If you have electronic voting without a paper record, where the person can see the paper record of his own vote, then you are asking for manipulation of elections by manipulations of the code.

Indeed, given the whole history of electoral corruption in every nation in the world, including the US, whoever believes that you can have voting done into a black box with no paper check on the black box to verify what was input is what was registered, is naive. Who ever argues against having a paper record is either naive, or very intelligent and knows EXACTLY what he is doing.

Electronic voting without paper backup records for verification is guaranteed to be corrupt, manipulated voting. If the Republicans aren't ALREADY manipulating the electronic voting sans backup paper, the Democrats most certainly WILL when they get power, and then you will never see another Republican majority again, because the machine codes will generate the votes necessary to ensure a Democratic win, and the Democratically-controlled government will never allow the issue to be opened to investigation. End of game. And end of democracy.

That is why everyone should assume that whoever wants electronic voting without any paper backup is intending to commit election fraud. Because they are.

[Suzy Quzy]

Here comes the CHAOS!!!

[Chode]

how many friggin lines of code can it possibly take to bump a dozen or so counters here and there???

but it prolly has several KLOCs of code.

[pray4liberty]

Diebold and the media are behind the vote scamming. Sign onto to http://www.votescam.com