Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Yet to Find Evidence of Foley-Page Sexual Contact
ABC ^ | October 18, 2006 | Brian Ross

Posted on 10/18/2006 8:14:46 AM PDT by xtinct

After interviewing some 40 former congressional pages, FBI agents have yet to turn up any evidence of direct sexual contact between underage pages and former Congressman Mark Foley.

Instead, according to law enforcement officials and several former pages, a pattern is emerging of seduction by Foley that began when the boys were 16 and 17. In cases where actual sex followed, it was not until the boys were at the legal age of 18.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foley; gerrystudds; page
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Always Right

"Still sick if Foley used the page program as a recruiting center for future sex partners. Kind of like a President using the intern program for sex partners."


Couldn't agree more. Indoctrination, softening the opinions of young people over time, for the homosexual agenda is sick. And does as much damage to kids as the eventual molestation does. Congress, schools, makes no difference, it's sick.


41 posted on 10/18/2006 9:29:11 AM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

42 posted on 10/18/2006 9:29:57 AM PDT by rbudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; xtinct; holdonnow; Laura_Ingraham; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick; Grampa Dave; ...




43 posted on 10/18/2006 10:36:27 AM PDT by devolve (now_playing:........significant shrinkage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

A sex scandal with apparatly no sex.


44 posted on 10/18/2006 10:37:38 AM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

And when they realized they weren't minors, they started referring to them as "teeagers." Of course that accurate, but they did it to create an image that Foley was preying on children.


45 posted on 10/18/2006 10:41:12 AM PDT by ShandaLear (So there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I noticed one of our local T.V. stations wanted to make sure they could string the story out longer by saying that he sent emails to "teens", instead of underage teens.

It's UNBELIEVABLE how much play this story is getting! Well, on second thought... No it's not, cuz the dork's a Republican!

46 posted on 10/18/2006 10:43:14 AM PDT by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Maybe the FBI should investigate whether any of the Congressional websites were compromised by their ISP providers.

-PJ

47 posted on 10/18/2006 10:47:33 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Fantastic, your menagerie grows!


48 posted on 10/18/2006 10:57:21 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: potlatch



It's a circus out there!


49 posted on 10/18/2006 11:08:14 AM PDT by devolve (now_playing:.......LOVE FOR SALE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Under the 'big top' of the capitol! A circus for sure.


50 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:29 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: devolve
Rove "unmasks" the whining/losers, the gloomers and doomer, Cut and Run CINOs on Free Republic.


51 posted on 10/18/2006 11:28:04 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Thanks for the ping!


52 posted on 10/18/2006 12:18:20 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Good points. I don't see anything illegal in what he did, but it is nonetheless wrong. I also hope people don't assume the pages he hit on are all gay.


53 posted on 10/19/2006 3:41:47 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Great pics.


54 posted on 10/19/2006 3:44:49 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All
"FBI Yet to Find Evidence of Foley-Page Sexual Contact" Instead of simply using the word "NO", they act as if they is evidence somewhere.
55 posted on 10/19/2006 3:47:08 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Still sick if Foley used the page program as a recruiting center for future sex partners. Kind of like a President using the intern program for sex partners.

have any pages been murdered?

56 posted on 10/19/2006 3:48:16 AM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
Toss up rumor and innuendo and let the compliant and hysterical 24/7 media take it from there.

You hit the nail on the head. The word pedofile is being used over and over, even in political humor. It seems like journalists are using it because they think conservatives have a problem with it while they really could care less if every politician devoted significant energy and effort to hitting on college freshman of the same sex as long as one consenting Democrat was involved.

This is kind of like us talking about Zell Miller being for the war. It drives them crazy.

57 posted on 10/19/2006 4:07:40 AM PDT by alrea (NPR promotes understanding of terrorists while Israel's very presence itself is challenged at NPR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Actually, you may have a point for media bias in general too. Since he is a "celebrity," the rules for libel/slander say there must be malice, IIRC. There is nothing but malice against Repubs in media coverage, day after day.


58 posted on 10/19/2006 4:42:23 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I don't like it, but to be fair why don't we start checking into the sexual habits and pickup lines of every homosexual Demoncrat in congress?

I keep wondering why, while they're at it, they just don't ask whether any congressman (or woman) has made sexual advances. Otherwise, they might just find them doing this all over again and over again . . .

59 posted on 10/19/2006 4:45:26 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson