Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coalition Forces Defeat Complex Attack in Ramadi
American Forces Press Service ^

Posted on 10/17/2006 6:00:17 PM PDT by SandRat

CAMP FALLUJAH, Iraq, Oct. 17, 2006 – Coalition forces defeated a complex insurgent small-arms-fire attack in Ramadi, Iraq, yesterday, killing three insurgents, military officials reported today.

There were no reports of civilian or coalition casualties.

Insurgents attacked three different coalition locations from several buildings at the same time with small-arms fire, officials said. In response, coalition forces established the origin of the gunfire and returned fire with small-arms and machine-gun fire.

When the enemy’s fire did not cease, coalition forces used increasing levels of force, including tank main-gun rounds followed by an air-delivered missile.

(From a Multinational Corps Iraq news release.)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: attack; defeat; forces; iraq; ramadi

1 posted on 10/17/2006 6:00:18 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!

WAR News You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

2 posted on 10/17/2006 6:00:37 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Great news! Only wish there was "film at 11:00!"


3 posted on 10/17/2006 6:17:11 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

more coming....


4 posted on 10/17/2006 6:18:08 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"When the enemy’s fire did not cease, coalition forces used increasing levels of force, including tank main-gun rounds followed by an air-delivered missile."

Well that shows how much our Soldiers know. When the enemy's fire did not cease, that should have clued them in that violence isn't the answer and that establishing a dialogue was necessary. Instead, they chose to resort to the same old trick from the same old imperial playbook. Bush's fault.

5 posted on 10/17/2006 6:27:44 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

As long as the city of Ramadi is standing, you know that we aren't using the level of ruthlessness necessary. that whole freakin' town should be rubble. give me a break.

ask yourself, 'what would patton do?'


6 posted on 10/17/2006 8:42:06 PM PDT by Uncle Billy ("A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away all you have")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Billy

that whole freakin' town should be rubble



EXACTLEEEEEEEEEE!


7 posted on 10/17/2006 11:17:20 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Billy
"ask yourself, 'what would patton do?'"

Patton was a great military mind...and he was a winner...but be careful of what you ask.

Patton, after all, led a majority Protestant army into Rome, climbed the Vatican steps, knelt before the Pope, and kissed the Pope's ring.

Within a short time, Italy switched sides in the war, joining the U.S. to fight against Mussolini's fellow fascists from Germany.

Would you really have an American general today repeat that same hat trick by kneeling before, and then kissing the ring of, the leading religious figure(s) in Iraq?

Are you prepared to accept onto your side tomorrow people who are shooting at you today?

Because that's what Patton brilliantly did with Nazi Germany's ally Italy.

8 posted on 10/17/2006 11:24:50 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Are you prepared to accept onto your side tomorrow people who are shooting at you today?

Because that's what Patton brilliantly did with Nazi Germany's ally Italy.


No, the Italians then and the moslems today are totally different. Back in WW2 there were millions of catholics and Italians in the US that loved America and were volunteering to fight for the USA. Can't say the same about the moslems today.

Also the Italians weren't fighting us on religious grounds, the moslems are.

ON the other hand, if the Saudis or the Jordanians or the Paks sent even one single brigade or battalion of uniformed troops to patrol the streets and join us in bullet magnet and IED magnet patrols, I'd be all for it.

But there ain't one single moslem from outside Iraq, in uniform patrolling with our Marines or Soldiers.
9 posted on 10/18/2006 3:02:32 AM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

When did the Albanians go home?


10 posted on 10/18/2006 3:06:24 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
"But there ain't one single moslem from outside Iraq, in uniform patrolling with our Marines or Soldiers."

That's incorrect. Beside American and UK Muslims in uniform in Iraq as of August 23, 2006, there were 23 non-U.S. military forces contributing armed forces to the Coalition in Iraq. These 22 countries are: Albania , Armenia , Australia, Azerbaijan , Bosnia-Herzegovina , Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia , Georgia , Italy, Kazakhstan , Latvia , Lithuania, Macedonia , Moldova , Mongolia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. However, in the August 16, 2006 Iraq Weekly Status Report (Slide 27) the State Department listed 27 foreign countries as contributing troops to the Coalition in Iraq. The additional four countries were Japan, Portugal, Singapore and the Ukraine.

11 posted on 10/18/2006 11:18:06 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Southack

i agree with tomas. islamic religions in today's context are totally different from the shared judeo-christian background that shaped patton's act. for proof, see patton's quotes about what he thought of islam. it wasn't like he didn't realize what islam was and its potential for problems. in fact, patton and churchill both warned us of what was to come.


12 posted on 10/20/2006 7:26:45 PM PDT by Uncle Billy ("A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away all you have")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson