To: NormsRevenge; ElkGroveDan; CounterCounterCulture
The real question in my mind is: Is it legal for cities to be spending money on political campaigns, albeit in this case, with a middle man to launder the money???
4 posted on
10/17/2006 6:53:34 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie; marsh2; NormsRevenge; ElkGroveDan; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; dalereed; ...
Why can't this be legally challenged?
Why doesn't this thread get more play?
I hate to see it sink off the sidebar so I bumped it for further play. I hope others will do it too.
6 posted on
10/18/2006 9:56:21 PM PDT by
SierraWasp
(To be fair, Bill Clinton did more than any other President to protect us from the Branch Davidians!)
To: Carry_Okie
The real question in my mind is: Is it legal for cities to be spending money on political campaigns, albeit in this case, with a middle man to launder the money???
Carry, is this a rhetorical question?
It reminds me of the question... "Is it legal for public employee unions to contribute to political campaigns for the elected officials that will subsequently direct the policies that effect public employee benefits?" (ie: bribing the boss)
7 posted on
10/18/2006 10:43:55 PM PDT by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: Carry_Okie
Spending public money.
To defeat a proposition to limit government excess.
Paid to an increasingly failing MSM.
Thereby helping keep MSM afloat.
Which neverendingly promotes the spending public money.
Sounds like a perpetual cycle.
Antidisestablishmentarianism.
42 posted on
10/19/2006 8:50:26 PM PDT by
Avoiding_Sulla
(You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson