Posted on 10/17/2006 7:01:47 AM PDT by areafiftyone
That piece of garbage is now where he belongs.
That piece of garbage is now where he belongs.
YouTube video of nancy pelosi in a 1987 homosexual agenda march
The hypocrisy will go over her empty brain.
I did hear something about a memorial service being held AFTER the election!
And I haven't been following the whole sordid Foley situation closely, but I wonder if AFTER the election it will come out that he never sent any explicit message to anyone under 18. I really wonder. I wouldn't be one bit surprised. I remember the "Downing Street Memo" - I innocently asked to see the actual memo - not a transcript, but a picture of it - and lo and behold none existed.
He was a sleaze, and he's gone. That's all I care about.
But I'd bet a week's pay that this story may indeed unravel - after the elections, of course.
And where is that and how do you know? Your comment seems a little self-satisfactory, smug, presumptious to me. For all we know, he may have accepted Christ into his life before he died. That's between him and the Lord.
Sorry, but your comment came across as hateful to me.
Vote! For heaven's sake VOTE and
She was almost certainly standing and clapping when Studds got a standing ovation on his retirement. C-SPAN certainly covered that auspicious event. Can any intrepid Freeper find that footage? After all, actions speak louder than words.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "An Open Letter to President Bollinger"
Please see my most recent statement on running for Congress, here.
Sometimes Fate hands over such an opportunity to make a point, that it's an absolute travesty not to use it. Just at the moment when Democrats would like to claim amnesia about "Who? Gerry Studds...never heard of him" The old pervert up and dies, FORCING the 'Rats to acknowledge his existence.
And where are the Republicans on this? Sure, they don't want to dishonor the dead - but the contrast can certainly be made concerning the difference in 'Rat treatment of his reputation versus that of Foley's or Hastert's.
Finally! A piece that does not praise this perverted POS as some kind of saint.
It is not Foley's behavior the Dems object to;( paging Captain Obvious) not any more than they objected to Studds' behavior. Their feigned outrage is simply thinly disguised glee at being able to bash a Republican. It is amusing, though sickening, to watch them condemn Foley while trying not to alienate a large portion of their base, those of the homosexual persuasion.
Fatboy is trying to praise him for the work he did for fisheries. Does that include the $10,000 a month bill he charged the state for a no-show consulting fee on the Bedford Oceanareum which never got built? Gerry, I hear they put sand in the vaseline in Hell.
Gee, I wonder if anyone has this on tape . . . :)
It might be as helpful to the Republicans as the tapes of Ruth Bader Ginsburg refusing to answer questions on issues that might arise before hero on the USSC.
Thank you for pointing that out!
And?
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.