Posted on 10/16/2006 2:17:50 PM PDT by jveritas
Document CMPC-2003-006758.pdf contain a memo form the Iraqi Intelligence Service ( The Apparatus) dated March 28 2001 that talks about plans to Strike US presence and interest in response to the new policies of President Bush toward Iraq and that aims at toppling the regime according to the memo. Few months ago there was another memo from the Iraqi Air Force also dated March 2001 that talk about recruiting member of the Iraq Air Force to conduct suicide missions against US interest (March 2001 Document: Saddam Regime Recruits Suicide Terrorists to Hit US Interests http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1610012/posts). This document CMPC-2003-006758.pdf is yet another proof that Saddam regime was working all the time to strike us and that it was our national interest had to take him out.
Translation of pages 5 and 6 of document CMPC-2003-006758.pdf
In the name of God the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate
The Presidency of the Republic
The Intelligence Service
Mr: The Respectful Assistant Director of the Apparatus Operations.
Subject: The New American Policy Toward Iraq
Aside is a notice for the 10th Directorate and attached is a note from the respectful Mr. Director of the Apparatus on 24/3/2001 that your Excellency and the two gentlemen directors of the 4th Directorate and 10th Directorate to study in what is issued on the 10th Directorate memo and which includes:
1. The available signs indicate the intentions of America under the presidency of Bush the Son that aim to damage the political leadership in the country, and among it is their seeking to apply what it called the smart sanctions and it summarize as:
A. Allow the importing of humanitarian goods to Iraq without prior approval and this aim to make the leadership in Iraq responsible for the starvation of the Iraqi people and not the responsibility of the United Nations.
B. The return of the Inspectors.
C. The massing of the World opinion around the special procedures to contain Iraq.
D. Travel prohibition for the Iraqi officials and the freezing of their special accounts.
2. The 10th Directorate suggested the following to encounter what was mentioned above.
A. Prepare a public relation plan that aims to clarify the rights of Iraq, and bring up what is related to the Palestinian cause, and the call to strike the presence and interests of America.
B. Work to commit some nations like France, China, Russia and Japan to economical agreements that make the implementation of the smart sanctions to have negative effect to the interests of these nations.
C. Strengthen our embassies with new remarkable staff that is can go toward new windows in the international relations.
D. Make a list of the citizens including those who are in the Apparatus that have in their names foreign accounts and do the procedures to protect these accounts from any enemy action.
E. Insist that that Iraq money will stay local.
Notice the Presidency of what was mentioned above.
Please review and please consider the opinions of the 4th Directorate, the 5th Directorate, and the 40th Directorate in regards to what was mentioned above with regards.
Signature
Director/ S. A. AA.
28/3/2001.
Incredible work. I hope someday you get your proper due J.
Thank you fellow freepers.
I remember that
But will this make Drudge, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc., etc...?
Blah blah Rove blah blah magnificent bastard blah blah.
We would be talking about the Arab Bomb as well as the North Korean Bomb. The only question is where Saddam would have tested his.
I just looked at your blog page. Would it be very difficult to put an "email a friend" option after each article?
"I think that Republicans have played things way too passively way too long."
Was chatting recently with a liberal neighbor about the upcoming elections. His take is that Republicans will win this election by manipulating the ballot process, and that the Dems are being much too passive about flaws in the new voting procedures and lack of a paper trail.
Funny. Tell your friend to read some of the market research rags. The dems are polling land line people. They have an 80's mentality. They just don't get it yet.
"We don't have enough federal translators to handle even a fraction of the data coming out of Iraq."
Does anyone have an opinion about the administrations sacking of some guy arabic language military translators several years ago. So far as I know they were just thrown out for being gay, not for bothering anyone. I could understand this happening years ago when being a closeted gay was easily blackmailable, but this century?
Thanks for the ping.....this one LOOKs like the BIG ONE!!!
Using some of my ping lists,...from other topics....
Sorry I'm so late, missed the ping earlier. This looks like an important find JV, I hope at least someone in the media picks it up.
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
CNN@cnn.com
CNN.onair@cnn.com
Viewerservices@msnbc.com
Letters@Newsweek.com
Letters@NYT.com
Editor@USAToday.com
Webeditor@Washingtontimes.com
Letterstoed@washpost.com
http://intelligence.senate.gov/
And, if we had not gone into Iraq and something happened, this would have been the Democrats' "smoking gun."
I really wish the Bush White House would do more to publicize this type of thing. Then again, they are busy LEADING and don't spend all their time REACTING.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: you are a TREASURE! Thanks so much for your hard work and I hope your translations are making their way to the right people in Washington.
I would add that this should be shared with the DBM "news" sources, but since they won't publish it (because it challenges their orthodoxy), this information HAS to be made known to the public in other ways.
I'm aware that they have to get the documents translated, and that jveritas has been working overtime translating them and posting his results here.
What I'm confused about is 'why', since this is such an important issue, we (our government) doesn't have enough federal translators. We've only been in this war since 2003. Why haven't enough translators been hired by now? The impression I get from the Bush administration is that translating these documents, this PROOF, is just not a priority. But, if it can win the war of words and verbal assaults against Bush and his credibility and integrity, coming from the enemy within, why the heck "isn't" it a priority? I just don't get it.
___
It's not that they have to vet in order to release it- it's released already- it's that they have to get it translated before they even know what it says. Jveritas here is one of the people translating these things and sometimes he's the first to do so since they left Iraqi hands- knowing what they say even before our own gov does. We don't have enough federal translators to handle even a fraction of the data coming out of Iraq.
Exactly! If Bush had NOT gone into Iraq, the leftists would all be accusing him of having ignored a blatant threat to the US. And you can bet your bottom dollar that THEY would have seen to it that these documents were all translated and lea...er....released.
And yes, leading is the most important function of Bush's job, but these documents also play an important part in the credibility of that leadership AND in the ability of him and the Reps to maintain control at this crucial time in America's history.
___
And, if we had not gone into Iraq and something happened, this would have been the Democrats' "smoking gun."
I really wish the Bush White House would do more to publicize this type of thing. Then again, they are busy LEADING and don't spend all their time REACTING.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.