Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pilots thrilled by CV-22 capabilities
Air Force Print News ^ | 6 October 2006 | Staff Sgt. Jeremy Larlee

Posted on 10/16/2006 9:10:13 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
More eggs for the naysayers to suck on.
1 posted on 10/16/2006 9:10:14 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Nice looking aircraft, 'course I think the Chinook is a good looking aircraft. :o)


2 posted on 10/16/2006 9:13:33 AM PDT by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

We dedicated the U.S. Air Force Memorial here in Arlington VA this weekend. The OSPREY pilots cannot stop talking about their aircraft and how great it is!

http://peace-and-freedom.blogspot.com/


3 posted on 10/16/2006 9:14:04 AM PDT by John Carey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

How did they work out the bugs re: controlling this aicraft? I recall that it killed dozens of Marines in accidents...


4 posted on 10/16/2006 9:18:11 AM PDT by Al Simmons ("I leave Japanese film in your hands." - Kurosawa to Kitano, 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Carey

And THAT is the best operational test you can get: the acceptance of the user community with enthusiasm. Both the units at New River and Albequerque love their new birds.

TC


5 posted on 10/16/2006 9:18:14 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I need a little help from the FRairwing. What the heck is "This versatile, self-deployable aircraft"

"Self-deployable" is not a term I'd hook up to aircraft.


6 posted on 10/16/2006 9:18:27 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

"How did they work out the bugs re: controlling this aicraft?"

They re-entered engineering development and did it right. It took five more years, but a superior aircraft resulted.

TC


7 posted on 10/16/2006 9:19:52 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I would just like to see what is the emergency procedure for a single engine failure. Just curious.


8 posted on 10/16/2006 9:20:39 AM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
How did they work out the bugs re: controlling this aicraft?

How did we land on the moon?. American know how and the best engineering in the world.

9 posted on 10/16/2006 9:22:02 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

That means that the aircraft can be flown to theatre, rather than being partially dissasembled and shipped by boat or cargo plan, as is the case for helicopters.


10 posted on 10/16/2006 9:22:35 AM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

cargo plan = cargo plane


11 posted on 10/16/2006 9:23:21 AM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cll

Thanks. Make's sense now.


12 posted on 10/16/2006 9:23:52 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
How did they work out the bugs re: controlling this aicraft? I recall that it killed dozens of Marines in accidents...

I heard the one crash that killed those Marines out in Arizona was pilot error. Don't know how to fix human error--I haven't seen anyone who hasn't made a mistke misatke mitsake mistake or three...

13 posted on 10/16/2006 9:24:25 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cll
I would just like to see what is the emergency procedure for a single engine failure. Just curious.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/v-22-survive.htm

An interconnecting driveshaft allows the Osprey to continue flying in the advent of an engine failure. Either engine can power both proprotors, although with reduced performance. The drive train subsystem is comprised of two proprotor gearboxes (PRGB), two tilt-axis gearboxes (TAGB), one mid wing gearbox (MWGB), an interconnect drive train, and an emergency lubrication system (ELS). The primary purpose of the drive system is to distribute engine power to the two proprotors, which generate lift and thrust. The drive system enables power distribution to the proprotors during all engines operating (AEO) and one engine inoperative (OEI) conditions.

Under normal operating conditions, each proprotor gearbox is powered by the nearest engine via the engine output shaft. In the event of engine power loss, the proprotor gearbox associated with the failed engine receives power from the opposite engine through the interconnect drive system. A sprag-type overrunning clutch between the engine output shaft and the helical input gears overruns so that the failed engine will not be back driven by the PRGB

14 posted on 10/16/2006 9:25:15 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

"I heard the one crash that killed those Marines out in Arizona was pilot error. Don't know how to fix human error--I haven't seen anyone who hasn't made a mistke misatke mitsake mistake or three..."

Yup. Pilot error, although they had help from the aircraft and from the flight lead. At any rate, after the horrific Marana mishap, the entire V-22 community had engraved on their brains "Don't let your sink rate build up below 40 knots."

TC


15 posted on 10/16/2006 9:34:28 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"How did we land on the moon?. American know how and the best engineering in the world."

Wish Ford would have found some of that before they went under.

16 posted on 10/16/2006 9:36:13 AM PDT by patriot_wes (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - may they prosper who love thee...Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes

so true


17 posted on 10/16/2006 9:40:26 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes

It's really amazing that US tech and innovation does not apply to the auto industry anymore.


18 posted on 10/16/2006 9:41:28 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Thanks for posting. Great aircraft.


19 posted on 10/16/2006 9:42:19 AM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The CV-22 has two distinct flying modes

CV-22 is a fantastic aircraft but statements like above scare me ... it not "two distinct flying modes" it ONE vastly expanded flight envelope and its pilot not fully grasping the dynamics in the transition zone in fixed wing VTOL aircraft that causes problems

The flight/pilot communities get it that being a fixed wing pilot is a different kind of pilot then being a roterwing (helicopters)...

Well there a third kind of pilot...a "VTOL" pilot and just like Harrier pilot before them, they better get there heads wrap around the whole flight envelope of the machine...

Greater ability of the machine demands greater responsibly of the operator

20 posted on 10/16/2006 9:42:30 AM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson