Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pilots thrilled by CV-22 capabilities
Air Force Print News ^ | 6 October 2006 | Staff Sgt. Jeremy Larlee

Posted on 10/16/2006 9:10:13 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham

Pilots thrilled by CV-22 capabilities
by Staff Sgt. Jeremy Larlee
Air Force Print News

10/6/2006 - KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFPN) -- When he talks about his new aircraft, the CV-22 Osprey, the lieutenant colonel's face lights up like a kid opening presents on his birthday.

After 10 years of flying the MC-130H Combat Talon II, CV-22 instructor pilot Lt. Col. Darryl Sheets, from the 8th Special Operations Squadron at Hurlburt Field, Fla., said he has enjoyed his time in the aircraft.

"When it's in the airplane mode, to me this is like a C-130 sports car," he said. "It is probably three times more responsive and is a joy to fly."

The CV-22 has two distinct flying modes. It is able to rotate its rotors in different positions to hover like a helicopter or fly like a traditional prop-based aircraft like the C-130.

Colonel Sheets said it was an amazing feeling when he hovered for the first time.

"I had a smile from ear-to-ear," he said. "The aerodynamics of this aircraft makes it extremely stable in hover and in the transition between the two modes. My hat is off to the engineers who designed it."

Hovering is old news for Capt. Paul Alexander, a CV-22 instructor pilot from the 8th SOS, who has 22 years of experience flying helicopters in the Army and the Air Force. But the ability to fly at altitudes of 25,000 feet, about 15,000 feet higher than the he was accustomed to in helicopters, and fly at cruising speeds about two times faster than a helicopter is exciting, he said.

"It's been a lot of years since I have eagerly looked forward to every flight I take," he said. "This is what is keeping me in the military after 22 years of service."

The two pilots are at Kirtland AFB to create the procedures for how the CV-22 will be deployed.

It is a humbling experience to know that generations of pilots will be using the work they created, Captain Alexander said.

"I'm living the dream," he said. "It is an exciting time for us because we are in on the ground floor and writing the book on how we are going to deploy this aircraft."

Colonel Sheets said learning how to operate the aircraft has been like going back to pilot school again. He believes the CV-22 will be an integral piece of the Air Force's special operation's arsenal for years to come.

"Every day is a challenge at work," he said. "Something new comes up daily and this aircraft never ceases to amaze me."


A CV-22 Osprey lands at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., Oct. 5 after flying an air-refueling mission. This versatile, self-deployable aircraft offers increased speed and range over other rotary-wing aircraft and can perform missions that normally would require both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo/Tech Sgt. Cecilio M. Ricardo Jr.)


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: cv22; kirtland; osprey; v22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: B4Ranch

During OT-IIG VMX-22 achieved a MMH/FH ratio of ~10 hours. Currently, the CH-46E fleet has a MMH/FH ratio of ~25 hours and the CH-53 fleet has a MMH/FH ratio of ~45 hours. VMMT-204, the MV-22 FRS at New River, has a MMH/FH ratio of ~15 hours.


81 posted on 10/18/2006 8:31:58 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Try this web site for info. Any ambiguity to the answers will cleared up soon enough once these guys have their shot. I tend to listen to the guys that fly the V22.

http://www.2maw.usmc.mil/MAG29/VMM263/newsletter/RaleighNewsObserver11Aug06.mht


82 posted on 10/18/2006 8:35:17 AM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
The capability hasn't been thoroughly tested yet.

Incorrect. Numerous transcons have been executed to date, without incident. This was the first translant. The divert to Keflavik, Iceland was done as a precaution only. The aircraft in question, a Block A model w/o deicing equipment, continued to fly for several hours after the compressor stall problem; although they experienced a flame out the crew was able to relight the engine. They did not lose an engine enroute.


Ed Garza / Bell Helicopter


Sheldon Cohen / Bell Helicopter

83 posted on 10/18/2006 8:55:15 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
CNN Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre threw up during his flight at New River in July of 2005.
84 posted on 10/18/2006 8:59:51 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
I'm not a big CH-46 fan but MV-22 cannot come into a LZ as quickly as any type of pure helo.

Incorrect. The Osprey has a quicker LZ ingress/egress rate than any rotary winged aircraft currently in the inventory: 220-0 KIAS in ~12 seconds; 0-220 KIAS in ~12 seconds.

85 posted on 10/18/2006 9:02:49 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
siganture

signature

86 posted on 10/18/2006 9:03:46 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Very impressive numbers!! Query; Are they using reverse thrust to slow down?


87 posted on 10/18/2006 12:14:22 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Into a cloud of red mist.


88 posted on 10/18/2006 12:34:29 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The Executive Flight Detachment at HMX-1 at MCAF Quantico operates the VH-60N Nighthawk.

That's right. But The Marines don't fly the H-60 in any other field environment, do they? My thinking was that they reject the H-60 for combat operations. I could be wrong.

89 posted on 10/18/2006 5:02:40 PM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

No reverse thrust is needed since the engines and proprotors can be tilted.


90 posted on 10/19/2006 5:54:12 PM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

No


91 posted on 10/20/2006 8:09:29 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: cll

The Marine Corps doesn't operate the H-60 in the FMF outside of HMX-1.


92 posted on 10/20/2006 8:10:31 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: cll
Pretty soon all those VH-60Ns will be replaced with the VH-71.
93 posted on 10/20/2006 8:22:31 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson