Skip to comments.
Wal-Mart 'Has Declared War' on Dems, Union Foe Charges
CNSNews.com ^
| October 16, 2006
| Randy Hall
Posted on 10/16/2006 5:12:16 AM PDT by Dane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Dane; Gabz
21
posted on
10/16/2006 5:31:40 AM PDT
by
metesky
(My investment program is holding steady @ .05ยข a can.)
To: Dane
We all Declare War on Democrats sooner or later. Democrats are really lame to make an issue over Walmart.
To: Terpfen
For a place that only sells pretty junky stuff, they sure do keep giving me reasons to come back.I had never gone to a Walmart for clothes, but I picked up a few casual "polo" style shirts for about $12 each... They seem fairly well made, and quite comfortable. The same sort of shirts at a department store go for 2 or 3 times more.
And I just picked up a 10 pack of VHS tapes for recording Battlestar Galactica episodes for less than $9.00. I went in to the Walmart at 10:00 am on a Saturday, and the place was PACKED!
It's obvious they're doing something right... Maybe selling inexpensive products for a decent price is a good idea.
Mark
23
posted on
10/16/2006 5:34:32 AM PDT
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: rocksblues
We shall see.
Hillary Clinton was on the board of Wal-Mart back when Bill was governor of Arkansas.
I'm still waiting to see where Wal-Mart will stand on her candidacy.
24
posted on
10/16/2006 5:34:49 AM PDT
by
Nextrush
(Government Obesity: The real obesity problem)
To: NewCenturions
All I can tell you is that in the area where I work as a Job Placement professional, my clients are hoping and praying to get to work at Wal-Mart. Its a great job for young people who have never worked. Its a great job for homemakers returning to the work force. It has a career ladder and is about the highest paying job for people without degrees or special skills to to found locally. We have both a Super store and a distribuition center and the job are actively sought after.
25
posted on
10/16/2006 5:34:54 AM PDT
by
cotton
To: MarkL
After all, these people must know how to run a business, since they're always telling Walmart how to run theirs.
I'm sure that this new company will be a real success.Maybe they could call it AirMart America.
To: Dane
President Bush's right-wing agenda LOL, I wish.
27
posted on
10/16/2006 5:40:47 AM PDT
by
Sloth
('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
To: 100-Fold_Return
"Unsure if this CNS can be trusted as it appears to be only a left-wing blog"
Left wing?
I think not . . . although its accuracy has been rightfully questioned a few times. They tend to jump the gun without thoroughly checking their sources from time to time.
http://www.cnsnews.com/corporate/history.asp
28
posted on
10/16/2006 5:41:34 AM PDT
by
blues_guitarist
(Black, conservative, Christian . . . . . . and I play guitar!)
To: alloysteel
Not because the "union shop" employee necessarily gets higher wages, as there is no definitive proof of this. Good point! And even if they did by the time the Union(s) skim off their membership dues these union shop employee may actually be bringing home no more, or even slightly less, than non-Union Wal-mart employees.
29
posted on
10/16/2006 5:43:24 AM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: Dane
"Even though an overwhelming majority of Americans, including Democrats, Republicans and Independents, now reject President Bush's right-wing agenda that has brought us a culture of corruption, repeated scandals, shipped American jobs overseas and even jeopardized our national security, Wal-Mart is launching a political campaign to help keep President Bush in power by trying to defeat Democrats who called on Wal-Mart to be a more responsible employer," Blank added. This dude is no friend of the republican party and should mind his own business and stay out of politics
Cause you can bet .. he will turn this around in time and use Walmart to support the Dems
30
posted on
10/16/2006 5:46:01 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
To: MarkL
Yeah, most consumers definitely worry about price more than quality. I personally don't mind paying a little more if there's good reason to: for example, I wouldn't buy a TV from Wal-Mart.
31
posted on
10/16/2006 5:47:47 AM PDT
by
Terpfen
(And in the second year, Nick Saban said "Let there be a franchise quarterback...")
To: Dane
"From this day forward, no citizen -- regardless of their party affiliation -- should doubt how right-wing Wal-Mart's agenda really is," Blank said. "It is an agenda that no American could support, jeopardizes the future of our country and is one of the key reasons why Wal-Mart's public image continues to collapse."Walmart's public image continues to collapse?
Net sales for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, were $312.4 billion, an increase of 9.5 percent over fiscal 2005. Net income for fiscal 2006 increased 9.4 percent to a record $11.2 billion, up from $10.3 billion in fiscal 2005. Earnings per share for fiscal 2006 were $2.68, up from $2.41 in fiscal 2005.
Public image must not equate to public buying.
But don't let facts get in the way of a liberal opinion.
32
posted on
10/16/2006 5:51:46 AM PDT
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Dane
I love this article, the whining is hilarious!!!
33
posted on
10/16/2006 5:52:22 AM PDT
by
bfree
(Liberalism-the yellow meat,)
To: Dane
Democrats declared war on Wal-Mart and are bitching when Wal-Mart decides to actually point it out. What big meanies.
I am not a Wal-Mart fan, but I wouldn't be mad if Wal-Mart pointed that out to others.
To: Dane
There they go again with that "living wage" nonsense.
A "living wage", okay?
- In Chicago's Gold Coast its about $500K to "live".
- In Malibu its what, a $l,000,000 a year.
- In SF and Manhattan maybe $250K for a couple
- BUT in NO it's $17 - $20K
So for arguments sake, say a 'Blue Haired' Chicago heiress from the Gold Coast wants a PT job at a Wal-Mart (to see po folk for kicks), are they suppossed to pay her $500K due to her address?
This "living wage" 'stuff' is Commie claptrap - period.
35
posted on
10/16/2006 5:56:54 AM PDT
by
Condor51
("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
To: Dane
Hmm $4.00 prescription drugs, pushing their employees to register to vote. With no guarantees that they will vote Republican and some talk that more new registrants may actually vote Democrat.
If it's a war, they'd better hire some new generals or strategists or Walmart is going to lose.
36
posted on
10/16/2006 6:02:23 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Islam = Religion of peace. If you say otherwise, we'll kill you!)
To: Dane
I think WalMart is in bed with the Chinese.
37
posted on
10/16/2006 6:03:45 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
To: Terpfen
Actually there is nothing wrong with buying TVs or any other form of home entertainment from Wal-Mart. I have done so and will continue to. They carry the same brands and anyone else, just usually a later model of the product. They are able to buy these in bulk, with a large discount, which they pass on to us. I have heard many people complain about things breaking when they got them from Wal-Mart. The problem is that they throw it off as being a cheap product, when they could have gotten a lemon from any store.
38
posted on
10/16/2006 6:03:51 AM PDT
by
Trygar
To: USS Alaska
The Wal Mart constitutiency must be very frightening to liberals. If all the shoppers and workers decided to all vote as a machine for the pubbies . .
Message to Dems: Be afraid. Be very afraid.
39
posted on
10/16/2006 6:04:39 AM PDT
by
sportutegrl
(This thread is useless without pix.)
To: Dane
The Star Tribune report stated that "Wal-Mart said it will specifically target local, state and national leaders who appeared this summer at a series of anti-Wal-Mart rallies organized by Wake Up Wal-Mart." HOW DARE THEY DEFEND THEMSELVES!
40
posted on
10/16/2006 6:05:59 AM PDT
by
MortMan
(I was going to be indecisive, but I changed my mind.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson