You mean like the one I was replying to by by Sir Francis Dashwood?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1719616/posts?page=58#58
And yet he was not banned or even given a time out for advocating gay anal sex. Hmmm... Go figure.
"Advocating?" You better read it again. I sense in no way that the poster thinks anal sex via forearm is a thing to be desired or promoted. Nevertheless it was over the top and properly deleted. While it did not make a point, neither did the post to which he was repsonding, which . . . surprise surprise . . was chock full of insulting remarks. But then again, maybe you thought that post, too, was a voice of reason for conservatives. I hope not, and I expect not, but then . . .
OOps!
It's #48 and it is GONE!