Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy launches 1st Littoral Combat Ship, US Coast Guard launches 1st National Security Cutter
US Navy, Chief of Naval Operations and US Coast Guard ^ | October 14, 2006 | Jeff Head

Posted on 10/14/2006 10:00:11 AM PDT by Jeff Head

US NAVY LAUNCHES AND CHRISTENS FIRST LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)

From Chief of Naval Operations Public Affairs

MARINETTE, Wis. (NNS) -- Thousands looked on Sept. 24, 2006, as the Navy christened and launched the nation's first littoral combat ship, Freedom (LCS 1), at the Marinette Marine shipyard.

“Just a little more than three years ago she was just an idea, now Freedom stands before us. And on this morning, we christen her, send her down the ways and get her ready to join the fleet next year,” said Adm. Mike Mullen, Chief of Naval Operations. “It comes none too soon, because there are tough challenges out there that only she can handle.”

The 377-foot Freedom is capable of speeds in excess of 40 knots and can operate in water less than 20 feet deep. The ship will act as a platform for launch and recovery of manned and unmanned vehicles. Its modular design will support interchangeable mission packages, allowing the ship to be reconfigured for antisubmarine warfare, mine warfare, or surface warfare missions on an as-needed basis.

Click on thumbnails for a larger pic
The Lockheed Martin vessel is 377 feet long, will displace 2900 tons, has a top speed in excess of 50 knots, will be armed with a 57 mm gun, a RAM CIWS system, a 40 ft small boat, and two H-60 helos or up to three VUAVs. In addition, it can be outfitted for differing operation packages including anti-surface, anti-submarine, anti-mine, or special operations.

The General Dynamics Trimaran version , LCS 2 [i]Independence[/i], will be luanched and christened in 2007.


US COAST GUARD LAUNCHES AND CHRISTENS FIRST NATIONAL SECURIY CUTTER

US Coast Guard Public Affairs

The first National Security Cutter (NSC), USCGC Bertholf, was built at the Northrop Grumman Ship Systems (NGSS) Ingalls Operations in Pascagoula, Miss. A ceremony was held on September 9, 2004 to mark the beginning of construction of the first NSC. The cutter was launched on September 29, 2006. The construction of the second NSC is underway. (Photos courtesy of Northrop Grumman)

Click on thumbnails for a larger pic
Eight vessels are planned to be built. They displace 4,300 tons, have a CODAG propulsion, are armed with a 57mm main gun, carry two helos, or up to four VUAVs, or a mix of one helo and two VUAVs, have a close in weapons system (I believe VLS cells), is outfitted with a small boat package, and have enhancied interoperability between Coast Guard and US Navy.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: lcs; littoralcombatship; natsecuritycutter; navy; uscg; uscoastguard; usn; usnavy; warshipdevelopment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Thought US Navy and US Coast Guard buffs would be interested, as well as anyone following US Military (particularly maritime) developments.

Fine vessels.

1 posted on 10/14/2006 10:00:12 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI...more late US Naval developments.


2 posted on 10/14/2006 10:01:01 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Say hello to my little freind Iran.


3 posted on 10/14/2006 10:01:41 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Very nice.


4 posted on 10/14/2006 10:03:23 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Armed with at 57mm. gun! Those were obsolete before WW2 ended, unless you were shooting at wooden buildings.

Perhaps it is a type and it will have a 5inch (125mm) gun or maybe a 75mm (3 inch) of which the Italians had a good model.

But doesn't seem like much aramament unless you are going to be taking on the local Sea Scouts in their rowboats.


5 posted on 10/14/2006 10:07:30 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I believe we are going to build upwards of fifty of those LCS vessels before all is said and done. They will work great in the littoral regions, along coasts or in confined spaces like the Persian Gulf, but are not really suited for high seas warfare. In coinjunction with a PHIBRON, or under cover of a US CSG futher out to sea, they will be real knife cutters.


6 posted on 10/14/2006 10:08:37 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat

Fine post.


7 posted on 10/14/2006 10:11:07 AM PDT by GitmoSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

It is not a typo. Modern 57mm guns with enhanced munitions are a far cry better than their WW II predesessors both in terms of range in in terms of the damage they inflict. Neither of these ships is suited or planned to be major surface combatants on the high seas. The LCS works close int to shore in knife cutting range, and the Coast Guard cutter is for maritime patrol and interdiction out to sea along our coasts.


8 posted on 10/14/2006 10:11:10 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The LCS looks like a very nice yacht. I'm gonna buy one .... as soon as I win the lotto. :)


9 posted on 10/14/2006 10:15:05 AM PDT by vincentjay (I'm convinced that Bill Clinton is the man most-likely to be revealed as the anti-christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Rapid fire 57mm guns are just the thing for a speed boat full of explosives driven by a suicide terrorist or an Iranian Guard infiltration team.
10 posted on 10/14/2006 10:16:24 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vincentjay

hehehe...lol...you better win several of the big jackpot verieties.


11 posted on 10/14/2006 10:17:50 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

"... doesn't seem like much aramament ...."

I wouldn't be surprised if they're someday retro-fitted with the new rail guns which are now under development. If I remember correctly, they're expected to start putting them in the fleet within about ten years.


12 posted on 10/14/2006 10:18:16 AM PDT by vincentjay (I'm convinced that Bill Clinton is the man most-likely to be revealed as the anti-christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Good morning.
"Armed with at 57mm. gun! Those were obsolete before WW2 ended, unless you were shooting at wooden buildings."

The fire direction systems, different ammo types and rate of fire make a difference, you know.

What's the gun on a Bradley? How about a Warthog? 25mm and 30mm?

These aren't your daddies 57mm guns. These are self loading, accurate systems that are great for the type of action the ships are made for.

Where was this stuff when I was a kid?

Michael Frazier
13 posted on 10/14/2006 10:19:18 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
...or for close support to shore, or interdicting other potential hostiles in the littoral regions.

And this vessel can really operate just off shore since it can itself operate in 20 ft of water. It is also fast, in excess of 50 knots, which makes it faster than most of those terrorist speed boats.

14 posted on 10/14/2006 10:19:56 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vincentjay
I'm afraid those will require too much electric power for these small vessels...until they miniaturize the power plants a lot more.

Now, the new CVN-21 carriers are going to have plenty of power.

15 posted on 10/14/2006 10:22:38 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville

Exactly...very well said.


16 posted on 10/14/2006 10:22:56 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I wonder what the old fogies will say when they find out the Bradley has a 25mm gun?. Guess maybe someone should explain to them it is not the size of the gun, it is the round you put in the gun that makes all the difference. Problem with the old ww2 guns was what the ammo they were firing, not the size of the gun


17 posted on 10/14/2006 10:26:31 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I just wish they didn't rhyme it with clitoral
18 posted on 10/14/2006 10:29:24 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Good afternoon. I hope you and the family are doing well. Thanks for the ping.

5.56mm

19 posted on 10/14/2006 10:38:43 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Thank you my friend.

We are doing pretty well all in all. My wife is helping my Mom down in Texas, and one of our daughters has had to come home here and be under bed rest for her next child because she went into labor 12 weeks early...but they have it under control. In the process, I am gladly playing Mr. Mom for my 3 year old granddaughter who is here with her Mom.

So, life is full of experiences and we plow on through, trusting in God in Heaven to work it all out if we do our best.

As always, best Fregards.

20 posted on 10/14/2006 10:50:42 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson