To: sukhoi-30mki; patton; Doohickey; sionnsar; Cyber Liberty; Congressman Billybob; neverdem
The EMP capability scares the hell out of me.
A single blast is trouble. Very nasty trouble for a single city, but it is localized.
EMP? Against civilian targets - against US! - could devastate economically and financially (since CIVILIAN EMP targets are NOT shielded) would knock the country back to the 1950's.
Now, what country, that the French socialists/communists hate, is threatened by EMP blasts?
11 posted on
10/12/2006 8:13:42 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
12 posted on
10/12/2006 8:21:51 AM PDT by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
16 posted on
10/12/2006 8:51:22 AM PDT by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
EMP? Against civilian targets - against US! - could devastate economically and financially (since CIVILIAN EMP targets are NOT shielded) would knock the country back to the 1950's.You mean back when the country was actually concerned about foreign threats?
19 posted on
10/12/2006 11:09:28 AM PDT by
EricT.
(The Democrats have decided it will either be a Democrat led America, or no America at all.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson