Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan bans North Korean imports after nuke test
The Vancouver Sun ^ | Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Hiroko Tabuchi,Associated Press

Posted on 10/11/2006 11:31:45 PM PDT by ferri

TOKYO - Saying the country was “in gravest danger,” Japan ordered a total ban on North Korean imports late Wednesday and declared that ships from the impoverished North were prohibited from entering Japanese ports as punishment for its apparent nuclear test.

North Korean nationals are also prohibited from entering Japan with limited exceptions, the Cabinet Office said in a statement released after an emergency security meeting.

Twenty-four North Korea-registered trade ships were moored at Japanese ports as of Wednesday afternoon, according to public broadcaster NHK. Local traders were already refusing to unload shipments to protest the alleged test, and the boats were expected to be ordered out, NHK said.

“Japan is in gravest danger, if we consider that North Korea has advanced both its missile and nuclear capabilities,” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told reporters following the meeting.

“We cannot tolerate North Korea’s actions if we...

(Excerpt) Read more at canada.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: japan; northkorea; nuketest; sanctions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
THIS is good news!
1 posted on 10/11/2006 11:31:46 PM PDT by ferri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ferri

Smart and needed.


2 posted on 10/11/2006 11:34:38 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ferri

Riddle me this Batman: What does North Korea export?


3 posted on 10/11/2006 11:35:49 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ferri

I say we ship Japan some nukes.

It would serve the double purpose of scaring both NK and China.

China might then take care of the problem for us.


4 posted on 10/11/2006 11:36:59 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Citizens, mostly.

Well, not intentionally, but they leave every chance they get.


5 posted on 10/11/2006 11:37:25 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

rice, dirt, disease, people?


6 posted on 10/11/2006 11:37:41 PM PDT by LukeL (Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ferri

Can anyone tell me just what it is North Korea exports, and why Japan would need it?


7 posted on 10/11/2006 11:38:04 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits targets no one else can hit, but genius hits targets no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

We don't need to ship nukes to Japan. They have tons of plutonium stockpiled and could build dozens of advanced nukes witin a year if they had the political will to do so. It would require that they change their constitution, which forbids them from having nukes. This may just give them the will to do it.


8 posted on 10/11/2006 11:40:37 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine

Never mind, I read the article: coal, sea and agricultural products (produce?)and other raw materials.....if Korea exports any foodstuffs at all with large enumbers of its people perpetually on the brink of starvation, that is a crime in itself.


9 posted on 10/11/2006 11:41:23 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits targets no one else can hit, but genius hits targets no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

ping


10 posted on 10/11/2006 11:48:50 PM PDT by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

i wonder what Kim's reaction is going to be?


11 posted on 10/11/2006 11:54:03 PM PDT by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ferri


Get your li'l bobbleheads while they last...
12 posted on 10/11/2006 11:56:58 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Wondering here how much business N. Korea does with Japan?


13 posted on 10/12/2006 12:01:34 AM PDT by AGreatPer (Boot Murtha,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

LOL!!! are operators standing by? i haven't gotten one yet! and now it sounds like the Japanese won't be able to either. :( poor them.


14 posted on 10/12/2006 12:01:50 AM PDT by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
hey AGreatPer! long time no see! :)

from the article:

A total ban on imports and ships would be a big blow for North Korea, whose produce like clams and mushroom earns precious foreign currency on the Japanese market. Japan imported US$133 million worth of products from the North in 2005, mostly sea and agricultural produce, coal, and other raw materials, according to government statistics.

15 posted on 10/12/2006 12:03:53 AM PDT by ferri (Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

One week.

Japan could have a nuke up and running in just one week!


Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006

Japan may not want to go nuclear but it's no technical hurdle: analysts

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20061011a4.html

By ERIC PRIDEAUX and AKEMI NAKAMURA

Staff writers


Japan will not respond to North Korea's nuclear test by developing its own atomic weapons, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Tuesday, although analysts said the nation has the technology to quickly pursue such a path.

Abe told an audience at Waseda University in May 2002 that it was not a violation of the Constitution for Japan to possess atomic bombs.

However, in Abe's declaration during a question-and-answer period at a House of Representatives Budget Committee, he referred to Japan's three nonnuclear principles of, according to the Foreign Ministry, "not possessing,not producing and not permitting the introduction of nuclear weapons into Japan."

"I would like to clearly state that there will be no change regarding the three nonnuclear principles," Abe said.
Experts were quick to point out that Japan does possess the knowledge and resources to go nuclear should it decide to.
"The country has enough plutonium and uranium," said Yasuhiko Yoshida, an international politics professor at Osaka University of Economics and Law who is a former director of public information at the International Atomic Energy Agency. "It could make an atomic weapon in six months."

That estimate may even be generous. Military-affairs expert Tetsuya Ozeki, as director at private foreign-affairs think tank ATWI Research Institute, believes the country could develop a nuclear weapon in as little as a week. But he thinks to create one would be foolish.


16 posted on 10/12/2006 12:07:32 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Pelosi helped keep Garry Studds and Barney Franks in office. Pelosi must resign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
”Japan will not respond to North Korea's nuclear test by developing its own atomic weapons”

This is interesting. I expected they would.

17 posted on 10/12/2006 12:15:56 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

I take it those are life-sized : )


18 posted on 10/12/2006 12:22:49 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

A massive 4' tall, I'd guess!


19 posted on 10/12/2006 12:52:51 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ferri

He might become more ronery?


20 posted on 10/12/2006 12:53:39 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson