Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid And The Culture Of Corruption
Captain's Quarters ^ | 11 October 2006 | Captain Ed

Posted on 10/11/2006 6:13:49 PM PDT by RKV

Once again, we discover why the Democrats quietly dropped their "culture of corruption" theme for the upcoming midterms. The AP catches Harry Reid without a disclosure on real-estate deals that netted him $700,000 in profit:

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show.

In the process, Reid did not disclose to Congress an earlier sale in which he transferred his land to a company created by a friend and took a financial stake in that company, according to records and interviews.

The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations. He's never been charged with wrongdoing - except for a 1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court. ...

The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported. The seller never talked to Reid.

In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land.

After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale.

In fact, this isn't a new development for Harry Reid. Less than two months ago, I wrote about Reid's questionable involvement and compensation in a related real-estate deal outside of Las Vegas, and the post turned into a column for the New York Post. Harvey Whittemore, a lobbyist and real-estate investor, plied Reid with campaign contributions and employed Reid's family members -- and in exchange, Reid did a number of favors that allowed Whittemore to realize large profits at the expense of environmental regulations that Reid helped Whittemore bulldoze. I wrote at the time:

The story of Coyote Springs sounds like a Horatio Alger story. The land Whittemore bought in 1998 from a defense contractor who intended on using it for target practice had a number of restrictions on its use. A quarter of it was subject to a federal power-line right of way. Another quarter had federal protection for the desert tortoise, an endangered species that also is Nevada's official state reptile. The land had a fragile series of streams and washes that required special permission on which to build without ruining the desert's ecosystem.

None of these obstacles proved too difficult for Whittemore, at least not while he had his friend Harry Reid running interference in Congress. Interior refused to relocate the tortoises for over five years, until the Bureau of Land Management agreed to swap the land for another parcel abutting a federal preserve elsewhere. No one ever did an analysis to determine whether the deal was fair to either party, nor did the BLM go to Congress for approval on the changes to a project that Congress had explicitly legislated.

In 2002, Reid worked on the power corridor. He inserted obscure provisions into a land management bill that relocated the power corridor, freeing Whittemore to build on the 10,500 acres that Congress had previously held -- which means that someone else now had to lose property value for Whittemore's benefit, and for no cost whatsoever. That bald move caused raised eyebrows at the BLM and the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Reid backed away -- for the moment. Less than two years later, Reid tried again to give Whittemore the land for a song ($160,000), but Congress balked again. He finally settled for freeing the land for development and allowing Whittemore to buy it at a fair market rate, and forcing the government to relocate the power corridor.

In 2005, Reid and fellow Nevada Senator John Ensign conducted a series of interventions with the EPA to eliminate the final obstacle -- the environmental impact on the fragile ecosystem in Coyote Springs Valley. When the agency blocked Whittemore's efforts, Reid and Ensign held several meetings with EPA officials to pressure them into submission. Whittemore used another Reid son, Lief, to lobby his father's office for assistance. In the end, the pressure paid off, as the EPA backed down from its opposition after winning a few concessions on the development plan.

What did Reid get in exchange for all of this support? According to the Times, Whittemore contributed $45,000 to Reid and his PACs since 2000. He also gave the DSCC $20,000 in 2000, when it pushed Reid as a leader for the party in the Senate. Reid's son Josh got $5,000 for his unsuccessful campaign for a city council seat; his other sone Rory got $5,000 for his successful effort to win a spot on the Clark County Board of Commissioners.

This appears to be of a piece with the Whittemore connection. In fact, it seems as though Whittemore's project was part of the transactions the AP discovered. "One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported" -- that's the same project as Coyote Springs. A major portion of that story had to do with Reid trying to grease the skids for the land swap so that Whittemore could get around the federal right-of-way.

Hilariously, this appears just days after James Webb tried smearing George Allen with a pseudoscandal over stock options that Allen disclosed and never exercised, meaning that he never cleared a dime from the options. Now we have the Democratic caucus leader dodging disclosures and failing to disclose $800,000 in profits from a project on which he partnered with a lawyer suspected of connections to organized crime and a bribery scandal. And let's not forget Reid's connections to Jack Abramoff, whom Democrats tried mightily to use as a poster boy for Republican-only graft:

The activities _ detailed in billing records and correspondence obtained by The Associated Press _ are far more extensive than previously disclosed. They occurred over three years as Reid collected nearly $68,000 in donations from Abramoff's firm, lobbying partners and clients. ...

Abramoff's records show his lobbying partners billed for nearly two dozen phone contacts or meetings with Reid's office in 2001 alone.

Most were to discuss Democratic legislation that would have applied the U.S. minimum wage to the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory and Abramoff client, but would have given the islands a temporary break on the wage rate, the billing records show.

Reid also intervened on government matters at least five times in ways helpful to Abramoff's tribal clients, once opposing legislation on the Senate floor and four times sending letters pressing the Bush administration on tribal issues. Reid collected donations around the time of each action.

Reid also had a former staffer go to work for Abramoff, who then held campaign fundraisers in Abramoff's offices.

No wonder Reid hung up on the AP reporter when they asked him to comment on this story. Reid has demonstrated that he has few scruples when it comes to using his position and power for his personal enrichment and that of his family and "associates". If the Democrats continue to have Reid as the leader of their Senate caucus, voters should realize the kind of leadership he will provide if the Democrats win control of the Senate.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: corruption; cultureofcorruption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: RKV
I'm rolling the dice that Ann Coulter will pick this up..
Susan Estrich's book has put her into the limelight even more than her current best seller has..

COME ON ANN... give Harry a shave..

21 posted on 10/11/2006 6:39:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Coulter

I'm rolling the dice that Ann Coulter will pick this up..
Susan Estrich's book has put her into the limelight even more than her current best seller has..

COME ON ANN... give Harry a shave..


22 posted on 10/11/2006 6:39:53 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RKV

bttt


23 posted on 10/11/2006 6:40:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

That make two of us and probably quite few more.


24 posted on 10/11/2006 6:41:51 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb

OUCH!


25 posted on 10/11/2006 6:43:43 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Well done; kudos !


26 posted on 10/11/2006 6:44:51 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Hey, hey, ho, ho, Harry Reid has got to go.

Say it with me ...

Hey, hey, ho, ho, Harry Reid has got to go.

Hey, hey, ho, ho, Harry Reid has got to go.

27 posted on 10/11/2006 6:46:00 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Nancy Pelosi is deeply disturbed.


28 posted on 10/11/2006 6:48:40 PM PDT by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Harry reminds me of the undertaker in "Tumbleweeds". I prefer to call Reid "Digger".


29 posted on 10/11/2006 6:53:11 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

RESIGN NOW SENATOR REID


30 posted on 10/11/2006 6:54:04 PM PDT by dhouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RKV

I love October surprizes.


31 posted on 10/11/2006 6:56:58 PM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs (Reason is out to lunch. How may I help you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

The media will bury this story unless the Republicans force the issue and get nasty with the dems.


32 posted on 10/11/2006 7:01:17 PM PDT by Alfonso1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Hurricane Karl has just been upgraded!


33 posted on 10/11/2006 7:03:41 PM PDT by airborne (Show me your friends and I'll show you your future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Hey, do you think this will be the lead story tomorrow on the TODAY Show?


34 posted on 10/11/2006 7:04:47 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (The Democrats newest paranoid strategy: Get to the bottom of the Vast Corn Hole Conspiracy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Agreed


35 posted on 10/11/2006 7:05:19 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hnj_00

Be patient, this will not go away.


36 posted on 10/11/2006 7:06:38 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002
Republicans have failed to lead on every issue. Sandy Burglar? Can you imagine what the Donks would've done if a Republican operative had broken into the National Achieves and carried off incriminating information?
37 posted on 10/11/2006 7:08:32 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

Not only that, but why was Reid giving his good friend (Jay the crook) such a 'good deal'?

What favor (to Brown) was Reid attempting to 'pay back', and what did Reid get out of the 'transaction'? Isn't there some kind of (ahem) rule against this?

Hell, they ran DeLay out of town on a trumped up rail with no proof. This is damned sure PROOF of impropriety, if not a downright crooked deal.


38 posted on 10/11/2006 7:11:52 PM PDT by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

RESIGN NOW SENATOR REID


39 posted on 10/11/2006 7:12:14 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Wow, you can't turn on the TV without seeing coverage of this story, eh? /sarc


40 posted on 10/11/2006 7:31:03 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson