Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid And The Culture Of Corruption
Captain's Quarters ^ | 11 October 2006 | Captain Ed

Posted on 10/11/2006 6:13:49 PM PDT by RKV

Once again, we discover why the Democrats quietly dropped their "culture of corruption" theme for the upcoming midterms. The AP catches Harry Reid without a disclosure on real-estate deals that netted him $700,000 in profit:

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show.

In the process, Reid did not disclose to Congress an earlier sale in which he transferred his land to a company created by a friend and took a financial stake in that company, according to records and interviews.

The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations. He's never been charged with wrongdoing - except for a 1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court. ...

The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported. The seller never talked to Reid.

In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land.

After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale.

In fact, this isn't a new development for Harry Reid. Less than two months ago, I wrote about Reid's questionable involvement and compensation in a related real-estate deal outside of Las Vegas, and the post turned into a column for the New York Post. Harvey Whittemore, a lobbyist and real-estate investor, plied Reid with campaign contributions and employed Reid's family members -- and in exchange, Reid did a number of favors that allowed Whittemore to realize large profits at the expense of environmental regulations that Reid helped Whittemore bulldoze. I wrote at the time:

The story of Coyote Springs sounds like a Horatio Alger story. The land Whittemore bought in 1998 from a defense contractor who intended on using it for target practice had a number of restrictions on its use. A quarter of it was subject to a federal power-line right of way. Another quarter had federal protection for the desert tortoise, an endangered species that also is Nevada's official state reptile. The land had a fragile series of streams and washes that required special permission on which to build without ruining the desert's ecosystem.

None of these obstacles proved too difficult for Whittemore, at least not while he had his friend Harry Reid running interference in Congress. Interior refused to relocate the tortoises for over five years, until the Bureau of Land Management agreed to swap the land for another parcel abutting a federal preserve elsewhere. No one ever did an analysis to determine whether the deal was fair to either party, nor did the BLM go to Congress for approval on the changes to a project that Congress had explicitly legislated.

In 2002, Reid worked on the power corridor. He inserted obscure provisions into a land management bill that relocated the power corridor, freeing Whittemore to build on the 10,500 acres that Congress had previously held -- which means that someone else now had to lose property value for Whittemore's benefit, and for no cost whatsoever. That bald move caused raised eyebrows at the BLM and the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Reid backed away -- for the moment. Less than two years later, Reid tried again to give Whittemore the land for a song ($160,000), but Congress balked again. He finally settled for freeing the land for development and allowing Whittemore to buy it at a fair market rate, and forcing the government to relocate the power corridor.

In 2005, Reid and fellow Nevada Senator John Ensign conducted a series of interventions with the EPA to eliminate the final obstacle -- the environmental impact on the fragile ecosystem in Coyote Springs Valley. When the agency blocked Whittemore's efforts, Reid and Ensign held several meetings with EPA officials to pressure them into submission. Whittemore used another Reid son, Lief, to lobby his father's office for assistance. In the end, the pressure paid off, as the EPA backed down from its opposition after winning a few concessions on the development plan.

What did Reid get in exchange for all of this support? According to the Times, Whittemore contributed $45,000 to Reid and his PACs since 2000. He also gave the DSCC $20,000 in 2000, when it pushed Reid as a leader for the party in the Senate. Reid's son Josh got $5,000 for his unsuccessful campaign for a city council seat; his other sone Rory got $5,000 for his successful effort to win a spot on the Clark County Board of Commissioners.

This appears to be of a piece with the Whittemore connection. In fact, it seems as though Whittemore's project was part of the transactions the AP discovered. "One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported" -- that's the same project as Coyote Springs. A major portion of that story had to do with Reid trying to grease the skids for the land swap so that Whittemore could get around the federal right-of-way.

Hilariously, this appears just days after James Webb tried smearing George Allen with a pseudoscandal over stock options that Allen disclosed and never exercised, meaning that he never cleared a dime from the options. Now we have the Democratic caucus leader dodging disclosures and failing to disclose $800,000 in profits from a project on which he partnered with a lawyer suspected of connections to organized crime and a bribery scandal. And let's not forget Reid's connections to Jack Abramoff, whom Democrats tried mightily to use as a poster boy for Republican-only graft:

The activities _ detailed in billing records and correspondence obtained by The Associated Press _ are far more extensive than previously disclosed. They occurred over three years as Reid collected nearly $68,000 in donations from Abramoff's firm, lobbying partners and clients. ...

Abramoff's records show his lobbying partners billed for nearly two dozen phone contacts or meetings with Reid's office in 2001 alone.

Most were to discuss Democratic legislation that would have applied the U.S. minimum wage to the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory and Abramoff client, but would have given the islands a temporary break on the wage rate, the billing records show.

Reid also intervened on government matters at least five times in ways helpful to Abramoff's tribal clients, once opposing legislation on the Senate floor and four times sending letters pressing the Bush administration on tribal issues. Reid collected donations around the time of each action.

Reid also had a former staffer go to work for Abramoff, who then held campaign fundraisers in Abramoff's offices.

No wonder Reid hung up on the AP reporter when they asked him to comment on this story. Reid has demonstrated that he has few scruples when it comes to using his position and power for his personal enrichment and that of his family and "associates". If the Democrats continue to have Reid as the leader of their Senate caucus, voters should realize the kind of leadership he will provide if the Democrats win control of the Senate.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: corruption; cultureofcorruption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Captain Ed beats the M$M and nails the Senate Minority Leader with a corruption charge that is going to be hard to beat. Let's get some popcorn, settle down and see how the press covers this (or doesn't) in the last few days before the election. I have a dream - Harry Reid doing the perp walk!
1 posted on 10/11/2006 6:13:49 PM PDT by RKV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RKV

Nancy Pelosi wants know: "Who knew what, and when."


2 posted on 10/11/2006 6:19:51 PM PDT by Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Looks like the Boston Globe's picked the story up. Reid has offered to update his Ethics declaration. Big of him.
3 posted on 10/11/2006 6:21:15 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
I won't be happy until I see Harry's ass frog-marched out of the Capitol. ;o)
4 posted on 10/11/2006 6:22:05 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

And Hitlery turns $1 thousand into $100 thousand and nothing's done. But she's a Demmycrat. So's this moroooon. So, nothing will be done. If we haven't done anything to Hitlery for theft of over 900 government documents, theft of over $100 thousand of government property, if we haven't tried and convicted Hanoi Jane, Bill Clinton, and John Kerry for treason, Sandy Berger for theft and destruction of government documents, and Paul Begala, Stephanopolous, and Carville for obstruction of justice and perjury, then why would we try Hary Reid for these new charges?


5 posted on 10/11/2006 6:25:12 PM PDT by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Reid is busted. Yeah!


6 posted on 10/11/2006 6:25:32 PM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKV
In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown.

What?!?!? Let me get this straight, he sold the land at below-market value (I mean, when did the price of land in Las Vegas last decrease?). Isn't that a violation of something?
7 posted on 10/11/2006 6:27:03 PM PDT by furquhart (Time for a New Crusade - Deus lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Looks like a lot of perp walks here.

Wonder if they'll give him Karl Rove's cell.

8 posted on 10/11/2006 6:28:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
You know, Republicans, being in the majority and controlling the exectuive branch and all, could launch an investigation.

Seeing as how they dilly-dallied on Sandy Burglar until just before this election, I don't see this happening any time soon.

9 posted on 10/11/2006 6:28:07 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Wonder why the AP would do this. Usually they're adept at covering up for the Dems.


10 posted on 10/11/2006 6:29:36 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

This is the same type of manipulation that led to the resignation, indictment and imprisonment of Randy Duke Cunningham. Reid is in trouble. GOP will play this up until election day because the accusation alone will hurt the donks tremendously because HE IS THEIR LEADER IN CONGRESS.


11 posted on 10/11/2006 6:29:51 PM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

What did Dick Durbin know and when did he know it?! He should resign for not knowing what his boss was doing! And of course Reid should go too.


12 posted on 10/11/2006 6:29:57 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Trivia for the movie "Casino". Robert De Niro's movie of true Mafia operations in Las Vegas:

Dick Smothers' character, Senator, is partly based on Nevada Senator Harry Reid, who was chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission. The scene in which Sam Rothstein is denied a license by the Nevada Gaming Commission is based on a December 1978 hearing when Harry Reid was the commission's chairman; some of Reid's statements are used in Smothers' dialogue. The scene was shot in an actual courtroom in the Clark County Courthouse, which was later closed in 2005.


13 posted on 10/11/2006 6:32:26 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
RESIGN NOW SENATOR REID
14 posted on 10/11/2006 6:33:18 PM PDT by mystery-ak (My Son, My Soldier, My Hero........God Speed Jonathan......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

nothing noted on any msm media evening news reports tonight...they were too busy bashing Bush!!!!


15 posted on 10/11/2006 6:35:40 PM PDT by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

nothing noted on any msm media evening news reports tonight...they were too busy bashing Bush!!!!


16 posted on 10/11/2006 6:35:57 PM PDT by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hnj_00

Yahoo Users!

Go to this site and "RECOMMEND" this story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061011/ap_on_go_co/reid_land_windfall_6


17 posted on 10/11/2006 6:36:30 PM PDT by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RKV
OUTSTANDING POST! Hooray for Captain Ed!

Exposing another member of the anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-life Democrat Crime Syndicate.

Resign Harry!

18 posted on 10/11/2006 6:36:39 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV








Boss Reid is descended from a long line of Democrat vultures.
He thinks he's exempt from the rules that govern others.
He says "Culture of Corruption? Me? I have no culture."

Boss Reid should resign.


19 posted on 10/11/2006 6:37:55 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Harry, at least Foley had the decency to resign after he was caught.
20 posted on 10/11/2006 6:38:57 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson