[jla]

The G.O.P. has feet of clay.

[traditional1]

So long as the PC-crap continues, afraid of offending the faggots and dykes is ruining the Republican Party, simply through the fear of Judicial Activist judges ruling in favor of the deviates as a 14th Amendment contortion.

Get the queers back behind closed doors, and the fear of discrimination lawsuits and activist rulings will be removed.

The standard "discrimination" claims is old hat; there must be discrimination (in the true sense of the word) to allow common sense folks to choose between right and wrong, and allow for society to establish MORAL principles, without legal intervention to forward deviant wishes....

[Ozone34]

The Republican party should go to school on what the "Lavender Mafia" has done to the Catholic church if it wants to avoid a similar disaster:

http://www.riteofsodomy.com

[stevio]

You never hear Rush or Hannity talk about the homosexual influence in society and especially the schools. Which in my opinion is the greatest threat to America.

[Just mythoughts]

Ah but Nancy Peolsi knew the children were not being protected. (Right now it is difficult to properly identify who exactly their children are.) So how come she is taking a pass on her responsibility?

Nancy in her lust for power did far more to expose their homosexual agenda than Foley and his chatty soliciting sex friends did. Their hope for assault in all their sex talk deluge did not leave unnoticed what must be common in their own party.

[Disambiguator]

"There's clearly an effort here to make this somehow a pedophile issue or something that's separate from the homosexual issue," he asserts, "and, of course, this is right up the homosexual alley."

Must

not

make

joke...

[JohnnyZ]

Sssshhhh, can't say anything truthful about gays on FR, the homoFRobe police will try to bust you for thought crimes.

How many times have people on FR said "this has nothing to do with Foley being gay"? And denied that he is a sexual predator? And said they'd vote for him again if they could? LOTS of people have already bought into the gay agenda -- oops, ssshhh, there's no such thing!

[ModelBreaker]

Meanwhile, one pro-family activist is calling for more openness about another aspect of the scandal. Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth believes the media have taken great pains to avoid using the words "homosexual" or "gay" in coverage of the Foley scandal. "There's clearly an effort here to make this somehow a pedophile issue or something that's separate from the homosexual issue," he asserts, "and, of course, this is right up the homosexual alley."

This is what the Old Media did with the Catholic homosexual priests scandal also. You would never know that over 85% of the alleged molestation was by male priests molesting teenage boys.

[bluebunny]

This is the most truthful article I've seen yet on this whole mess. Nail hit head. I also have been disturbed by Rush and others freepers using terms of the left like "gay bashing". Then these same people will say we are inching to liberalism. Well, they are f*cking helping it get there!

[Peter Libra]

Sad to say it but..... the facts are that the "Tolerance" that turns persons aside from their gut feeling, is a culprit. I feel fairly sure that the political correctness of "tolerance" may have forced GOOD MEN to ignore their inner conscience.

The British secret service and other agencies were infiltrated by the homosexual. The West almost lost the cold war because of the almost universal treason by homosexuals. The excuse has been used that the Russians were able to blackmail them. That was not the entire excuse by a long shot. Something in many of the homosexuals make up, seems to bring about a flaunting of the rules. A point is in the so-called "gay parades". Could such an individual obscenely flamboyant, be trusted?

Fifty years ago, the conservatives would have known - put a homosexual in a position of trust and power, WITHOUT CLOSE SCRUTINY at one's peril.

Hopefully the Foley affair has a shelf life. The opposition may have "peaked too soon". (I pray).

[theDentist]

I caught O'Reilly last eve interviewing the guy who outed Foley. I don't recall his name but he said he's going to "out" a number of other Republicans in the next week or so... no Dems though... only 'Pubs because "they are being hypocrites and living a lie."

[Brad from Tennessee]

"There is a well-documented history of homosexual men pursuing underage boys, LaBarbera says; but homosexual activists are getting help in burying this fact."

They are getting help from the news media which is riddled with gays. An article in the New Yorker magazine last year lauded New York Times publisher "Pinch" Sulzberger for creating the "most gay-friendly" newsroom in the industry.

[Antoninus]

Being an active homo should absolutely disqualify you from holding any major office or position of authority in the GOP.

The Catholic Church in the US didn't learn that lesson in the 1950s-1980s and we are still sufferring for it to this day.

[Mrs. Don-o]

bump

[ozzymandus]

Another RAT ploy to upset "easily-led fundamentalists" by telling them their GOP leadership loves gays.

[Ol' Sparky]

Yet another reason why the Republicans are facing losing seats in Congress. Clean the closet or lose power.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Article and discussion about the role of homosexuals (activists) in the GOP.

If a homosexual is actually a conservative, why does s/he need to advertise himself as a "gay" Republican? The Log Cabin guys are perfect examples. If you look at the (known) homosexuals in public office, even the Republicans vote much if not most of the time for social liberalism.

If anyone wants on/off this pingllist, freepmail me and/or wagglebee.

[ElkGroveDan]

It's not new.

[LadyNavyVet]

Why is Agape Press parroting the New York Times? Does the NYT have any proof whatsoever of any of the claims in the article? If so, where is it?

I wouldn't believe the NYT if they said grass is green and the sky is blue.