Skip to comments.
Gertz: U.S. doubts Korean test was nuclear
The Drudge Report ^
| October 9, 2006
| Drudge
Posted on 10/09/2006 7:52:09 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: TASMANIANRED
My understanding is that it takes a very high level of technical capability to reprocess plutonium from a reactor into weapons-grade plutonium. Few nations have that level of scientific capability and in North Korea's run-down and currently cash depleted condition, NK may not be able to build plutonium bombs. Let's hope not.
21
posted on
10/09/2006 8:09:19 PM PDT
by
defenderSD
(CO2 is not a pollutant and I am not a polluter when I breathe....you hear that Algore?)
To: idkfa
"That train explosion in Ryonchon in '04 measured 3.6."May have been where they got the idea.
22
posted on
10/09/2006 8:10:26 PM PDT
by
TheLion
To: blogblogginaway
I read the equivalent of 500 tons of TNT was used.
Trying to impress the world of their new found explosive power has but resulted in a humiliating dud. Its' possible NK had the blast to impress the Iranian scientists present that a nuke blast did occur in the hopes Iran would fall for it and result in Iran percurment of the technology.
I, myself, a'm doubting the nuke blast occurred.
23
posted on
10/09/2006 8:11:49 PM PDT
by
TOneocon
To: TheLion
They may have also got the idea from one of those old movies that Kim likes to watch. You know, the ones where guys blast open underground bank vaults.
24
posted on
10/09/2006 8:12:26 PM PDT
by
defenderSD
(CO2 is not a pollutant and I am not a polluter when I breathe....you hear that Algore?)
To: digger48
"The Beast had a few words to screech today, herself. (and I use the term "herself" quite sparingly)."While we're on the subject of abrasive New York senators, it's funny but I haven't heard Chucky Schumer expounding lately on the need to do "trust-busting" of oil companies. Looks like those oil companies are more productive and less aggressive about pricing than he said they were.
25
posted on
10/09/2006 8:17:29 PM PDT
by
defenderSD
(CO2 is not a pollutant and I am not a polluter when I breathe....you hear that Algore?)
To: defenderSD
He is going to look like a real jerk, if it is proved that this was a fake....not that he isn't allready.
26
posted on
10/09/2006 8:20:25 PM PDT
by
TheLion
To: Strategerist
...if simply the high explosive trigger goes off, you do NOT get an M 4 range earthquake. I agree. So obviously, they faked it.
"Was it as good for you as it was for me darling? I mean...baby...the Earth...MOVED."
27
posted on
10/09/2006 8:23:41 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
To: blogblogginaway; Admin Moderator
Thanks for moving this one to breaking.
28
posted on
10/09/2006 8:28:38 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(Monthly donors rock!)
To: bandleader
It's a "fake but accurate" nuclear test ;)
29
posted on
10/09/2006 8:30:23 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: blogblogginaway
It is possible to make a lower yield device.
Davy Crockett (nuclear device)
"..The M-388 round used a version of the W54 warhead, a very small sub-kiloton fission device. The Mk-54 weighed about 51 lb (23 kg), with a selectable yield of 10 or 20 tons (very close to the minimum practical size and yield for a fission warhead). The complete round weighed 76 lb (34.5 kg). It was 31 in. (78.7 cm) long with a diameter of 11 in. (28 cm) at its widest point; a subcaliber piston at the back of the shell was actually inserted into the launcher's barrel for firing.."
To: blogblogginaway
Maybe Rove suggested the blast be downplayed, so that Kim will test all his nukes underground and run out!
31
posted on
10/09/2006 8:32:04 PM PDT
by
Solamente
(Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
To: MrNationalist
"I wonder if this gave them the idea of using explosives to appear like a Nuclear test. Story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3655613.stm" Beside that train explosion in April of 2004, NK had an "ammo dump" blow up around September 11, 2004 fairly close to the recent seismic event.
32
posted on
10/09/2006 8:33:15 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: TheLion
Unfortunately the oppressed folks in his country will not know. They will still worship him as an omnipotent god and continue to starve to death.
33
posted on
10/09/2006 8:33:31 PM PDT
by
doc1019
To: blogblogginaway
The Film Actor's Guild is deeply disturbed
34
posted on
10/09/2006 8:34:37 PM PDT
by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: blogblogginaway
It depends upon what the meaning of "nuclear" is......
35
posted on
10/09/2006 8:36:05 PM PDT
by
Wil H
To: blogblogginaway
Nucrear Exprosion? Reary?
To: blogblogginaway
Oh, OK. We do not need any response now. Nighty nite.
Is the sarcasm tag needed?
37
posted on
10/09/2006 8:39:43 PM PDT
by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: blogblogginaway
I'd be a little cautious:
-past underground tests have appeared smaller on seismograph readings than they actually were.
-the russians should not be looked at as an entirely non-credible source... they know a lot about underground testing and its results.
-if it was a failure, we are still likely to see further attempts.
-worst option could be that they have a small yield weapon that could fit on a missile in their inventory.
They have been pumping money into this for years... it's not as hard to accomplish as it was when we did it. It's highly likely that if this failed, they will still succeed if not forceably stopped.
38
posted on
10/09/2006 8:40:14 PM PDT
by
nwctwx
(Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
To: proxy_user
Is it nu-clear or is it un-clear?
39
posted on
10/09/2006 8:41:23 PM PDT
by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
To: digger48
But the Russians said it was 5-15 kt. So what did they know and when did they know it? They knew the design yield, rather than the actual squib performance. Ergo they didn't get the estimate from a seismograph. They got it the old fashioned way - their plausible-denial nuke-the-Yankees flunkies told them.
40
posted on
10/09/2006 8:42:05 PM PDT
by
JasonC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson