Skip to comments.
Heads Up! President Bush Addresses the Nation 09:45AM ET
Fox News
| 10/9/2006
| staff
Posted on 10/09/2006 6:39:50 AM PDT by kellynla
President Bush addresees the nation from the White House 09:45AM ET
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; hansbrix; kim; nkorea; nodong; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 501-515 next last
To: alwaysconservative
Yes I have seen several ads saying "Tell President Bush to save Darfur". I've been thinking about that. What do they expect President Bush to do about it? The only meaningful thing that will stop the genocide is to go in there militarily and slaughter the Islamic militias then keep a presence on the ground for an indeterminable time, maybe years. Yet, these are the same types of people urging to save Darfur that are protesting us doing the same thing in Iraq. Are the libs saying that we should invade Sudan? Jeez, let's just let the UN send a strongly-worded letter. That will stop the genocide.
401
posted on
10/09/2006 8:30:54 AM PDT
by
Sender
(Error 404: tagline not found)
To: Graymatter
Yep thats exactly what the Liberals say starvation is a beautiful and dignified way to die....
402
posted on
10/09/2006 8:31:26 AM PDT
by
tomnbeverly
(The More Americans that take 911 personally the better served we will all be.)
To: rhombus
403
posted on
10/09/2006 8:32:03 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(George W. Bush - "Take his character all together, and we shall not look upon his like again.")
To: OldFriend
Sure, I agree with you on that. But, hat I am basically saying (in terms of food) is that the NK Leaders don't care a whole lot about their citizens starving, they already are. NK controls their people with food (and other tactics of course).
To: silentknight
Positive attitude....not.
What exactly is Bush to do at this point? Thanks to the policies of Bubba that pretty much handed NK everything they needed, Bush is stuck with two options:
Diplomacy using regionl partners to hammer on NK at the UN and overall internationally or;
Military action which would likely trigger a Korean War that would take significant focus from our WOT - at a time when we really need to put a laser beam focus in Afghanistan and Iraq. Can we fight NK and win? Yes, but if that happens Iran will make it's move in the Middle East while we are engaged in NK and not as focused on Iraq and Afghanistan
405
posted on
10/09/2006 8:37:48 AM PDT
by
GLH3IL
(Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
To: All; kellynla; nw_arizona_granny; DAVEY CROCKETT; Velveeta; milford421; Cindy; backhoe; ...
I quickly scanned the thread and didn't see this posted, so here is the text of President Bush's speech this morning as released on WhiteHouse.gov:
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 9, 2006
President Bush's Statement on North Korea Nuclear Test Diplomatic Reception Room
9:58 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Last night the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a nuclear test. We're working to confirm North Korea's claim. Nonetheless, such a claim itself constitutes a threat to international peace and security. The United States condemns this provocative act. Once again North Korea has defied the will of the international community, and the international community will respond.
This was confirmed this morning in conversations I had with leaders of China, and South Korea, Russia, and Japan. We reaffirmed our commitment to a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula, and all of us agreed that the proclaimed actions taken by North Korea are unacceptable and deserve an immediate response by the United Nations Security Council.
The North Korean regime remains one of the world's leading proliferator of missile technology, including transfers to Iran and Syria. The transfer of nuclear weapons or material by North Korea to states or non-state entities would be considered a grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable of the consequences of such action.
The United States remains committed to diplomacy, and we will continue to protect ourselves and our interests. I reaffirmed to our allies in the region, including South Korea and Japan, that the United States will meet the full range of our deterrent and security commitments.
Threats will not lead to a brighter future for the North Korean people, nor weaken the resolve of the United States and our allies to achieve the de-nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Today's claim by North Korea serves only to raise tensions, while depriving the North Korean people of the increased prosperity and better relations with the world offered by the implementation of the joint statement of the six-party talks. The oppressed and impoverished people of North Korea deserve that brighter future.
Thank you.
END 10:01 A.M. EDT
406
posted on
10/09/2006 8:38:14 AM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(Liberty Rocks Blog: http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com)
To: McGavin999
China is the one who comes out of this the biggest failure in the eyes of the world.China, Russia and Iran care little of their image among the weak, western nations. They know we will continue to trade with them... up until their nukes fall on our cities
407
posted on
10/09/2006 8:40:10 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: Sender
Of course he could always claim he didn't know the mic was hot and announce that we are launching a missile strike. But I think that's been done.
408
posted on
10/09/2006 8:40:26 AM PDT
by
VRWCtaz
("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
To: TexasPatriot8
"Their desperation in manipulating the whole Foley manufactured scandle as the single most important thing in the country to them proves that."
Desperate but sucessful it seems . SAD .What a dumb population we now have .
To: Joan Kerrey
I personally don't believe China is outraged.
To: TexasPatriot8
This post is the best thing I've read in a long time.
Thank you!
411
posted on
10/09/2006 8:42:52 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: GLH3IL
Bush is stuck with two options That's where you're wrong. There are more options than diplomacy or invasion. The regimes of NK and Iran are both ripe for a fall, but it takes time to set those things up. The incentive for taking out Li'l Kim has now increased markedly -- his days are numbered. As I've said several times already, I China will do the legwork to set up a coup.
412
posted on
10/09/2006 8:43:32 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Sacajaweau
Remember this Korean problem goes back to Bubba's administration.
I thought it went back to the 50's. Gosh if only Bubba was at fault that would be easier to deal with than 50 plus years of this back and forth stuff.
To: OldFriend
Thanks! I tend to lump all stations together as simply TV and watch none of them. ;*)
414
posted on
10/09/2006 8:46:14 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: maica
Thanks! I would love to see the tapes of Rush's show some time.
415
posted on
10/09/2006 8:46:58 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: OldFriend
Yes, yes, yes. China's actions speak louder than words. If you shut the sound off it's very evident what's going on.
Why would you want to blind a US satellite?
416
posted on
10/09/2006 8:47:28 AM PDT
by
TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
(For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.)
To: NewLand
To: Just A Nobody
The communists are closer to their goals now then they have ever been before.When the Soviets dropped the banner... it was picked up by the Euro/American left for safe-keeping.
418
posted on
10/09/2006 8:49:29 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: pierrem15
That's simply political reality, not defeatism. Only item "c" has any merit in your list of Achilles'heel points.
419
posted on
10/09/2006 8:49:43 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: silentknight
The President, as you may recall, went to the UN before he dealt with Iraq. He's building his resources, biding his time, and putting his real game in play under the cover of a smoke screen known as the UN.
420
posted on
10/09/2006 8:50:15 AM PDT
by
GLH3IL
(Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 501-515 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson