Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelicals Blame Foley, Not Republican Party
NY Times ^ | October 9, 2006 | DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Posted on 10/09/2006 3:41:35 AM PDT by Pharmboy


Gary C. Knapp for The New York Times
“That is the problem we have in society. Nobody polices anybody. Everybody has a ‘right’ to do whatever.”
DAVID THOMAS, Father, Norfolk, Va.

VIRGINIA BEACH, Oct. 7 — As word of Representative Mark Foley’s sexually explicit e-mail messages to former pages spread last week, Republican strategists worried — and Democrats hoped — that the sordid nature of the scandal would discourage conservative Christians from going to the polls.

But in dozens of interviews here in southeastern Virginia, a conservative Christian stronghold that is a battleground in races for the House and Senate, many said the episode only reinforced their reasons to vote for their two Republican incumbents in neck-and-neck re-election fights, Representative Thelma Drake and Senator George Allen.

“This is Foley’s lifestyle,” said Ron Gwaltney, a home builder, as he waited with his family outside a Christian rock concert last Thursday in Norfolk. “He tried to keep it quiet from his family and his voters. He is responsible for what he did. He is paying a price for what he did. I am not sure how much farther it needs to go.”

The Democratic Party is “the party that is tolerant of, maybe more so than Republicans, that lifestyle,” Mr. Gwaltney said, referring to homosexuality.

Most of the evangelical Christians interviewed said that so far they saw Mr. Foley’s behavior as a matter of personal morality, not institutional dysfunction.

All said the question of broader responsibility had quickly devolved into a storm of partisan charges and countercharges. And all insisted the episode would have little impact on their intentions to vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: evangelicals; foley; hastert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: raybbr
Would someone please point me to the sexually explicit part? I don't see anything remotely explicit in his e-mails.

Well, then, the LSM has obviously not said/printed/broadcast enough times that the emails were sexually explicit. You still don't believe the lie. LOL and good for you!

21 posted on 10/09/2006 4:15:30 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I don't think the DBM has any clue how much anger this has generated towards them.


22 posted on 10/09/2006 4:18:56 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Most of the evangelical Christians interviewed said that so far they saw Mr. Foley’s behavior as a matter of personal morality, not institutional dysfunction.

Uh, yeah. Unlike Dems, we don't blame everyone else for our own personal failings and challenges. This is why the Republican party is an excellent choice for groups of people who have historically seen themselves or are called 'victims' in society. Dems reinforce this thinking; Republicans say BS you can be more if you try.

23 posted on 10/09/2006 4:19:49 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

What's DBM?


24 posted on 10/09/2006 4:20:00 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

LOL. I never thought of rain as a weather hazard preventing folks from driving to the polls.


25 posted on 10/09/2006 4:20:43 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Drive
By
Media


26 posted on 10/09/2006 4:21:24 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Evangelicals blame the New York Times and nobody else.


27 posted on 10/09/2006 4:21:58 AM PDT by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubie

I think I am suffering from Foley phatique.


28 posted on 10/09/2006 4:25:01 AM PDT by beckysueb (Pray for President Bush and our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

I'm stunned this story got by the editors.


29 posted on 10/09/2006 4:26:28 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
I don't think the DBM has any clue how much anger this has generated towards them.

What really makes me angry is that they have been trying to force the gay agenda on this country for years. Now they xpect us to get outraged over this Foley thing. They pushed the gay agenda so well that all it gets is a yawn. I think only the left and the MSM are upset over this. Hypocrites!

30 posted on 10/09/2006 4:31:08 AM PDT by beckysueb (Pray for President Bush and our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

David Kirkpatrick is the conservative beat writer for the New York Times. Yes, they have a conservative beat - we're kind of like a foreign country to that paper and most of its readers.


31 posted on 10/09/2006 4:34:27 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

And here I thought it was Dain Bramaged Media.


32 posted on 10/09/2006 4:36:51 AM PDT by elc (Feeling the babywearing love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
It is not the driving part. They are scared to death of a thunderstorm.

We have early voting, so rain is not as much of a deterrent as used to be here.
33 posted on 10/09/2006 4:39:08 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Ah I missed who the author was. That explains it. I wonder if any of the folks at the paper will even bother to read it.


34 posted on 10/09/2006 4:39:39 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

See 32...


35 posted on 10/09/2006 4:39:44 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Every single day provides at least one new reason to hate the mainstream media...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: elc

Well that works also.


36 posted on 10/09/2006 4:40:10 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Well who are we to tell them to put their lives in danger?


37 posted on 10/09/2006 4:42:28 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

LOL!!!!


38 posted on 10/09/2006 4:44:04 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dane

To quote the coiner of the phrase:

Folks, they are the DRIVE BY MEDIA-- "The mainstream media … are drive-by shooters. This is exactly what they are. They pull up to a congested area; they spray a hail of bullets into the crowd, causes mass hysteria, mass confusion, mistakes and misinterpretation. Sometimes people or their careers actually die. The mainstream media then smirks and pats itself on the back, says, "Look what we can do," and they ride away unnoticed in the excitement. They are never blamed; they are never held accountable. In fact, they are lauded, they are held up as heroes, mostly by themselves. But they are. They just troll around looking for any issue they can to get everybody all worked up, creating hysteria. It is like a drive-by shooter. It's like road rage every day. That's what the mainstream press has become."
-Rush Limbaugh


39 posted on 10/09/2006 5:12:52 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

they are the DRIVE BY MEDIA

Where are the 26 major Hurricanes?

A handcuffed Rove being dragged out of the White House?

10,000 body bags in the first month from Iraq?

The list is endless.


40 posted on 10/09/2006 5:30:35 AM PDT by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson