Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American casualties in Iraq rise sharply
The Washington Post ^ | October 8 2006 | Ann Scott Tyson

Posted on 10/07/2006 9:24:04 PM PDT by jmc1969

The number of U.S. troops wounded in Iraq has surged to its highest level in nearly two years as American GIs fight block-by-block in Baghdad to try to check a spiral of sectarian violence that U.S. commanders warn could lead to civil war.

Last month, 776 U.S. troops were wounded in action in Iraq, the highest number since the military assault to retake the insurgent-held city of Fallujah in November 2004, according to Defense Department data. It was the fourth-highest monthly total since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

The sharp increase in American wounded — with nearly 300 more in the first week of October — is a grim measure of the degree to which the U.S. military has been thrust into the lead of the effort to stave off full-scale civil war in Iraq, military officials and experts say. Beyond Baghdad, Marines battling Sunni insurgents in Iraq's western province of Anbar last month also suffered their highest number of wounded in action since late 2004.

"September was horrific" in terms of the toll of wounded, and if the early October trend continues, this month could be "the worst month of the war," said John E. Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a Virginia-based Web site that tracks defense issues.

The worsening violence in Baghdad has led some Pentagon officials to criticize decisions by the U.S. military since early 2005 to transfer responsibility for security in large swaths of Baghdad to Iraqi forces while cutting back on American patrols.

"We made decisions to take an indirect approach, which is great if you want low U.S. casualty rates," said the Pentagon official. However, he said: "Passing responsibility to Iraqis does not equal defeating terrorists and neutralizing the insurgency. Period."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
The terrorists are hitting us so hard right now for the same reason the dems are hitting us so hard right now.
1 posted on 10/07/2006 9:24:04 PM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
The terrorists are hitting us so hard right now for the same reason the dems are hitting us so hard right now.

The accuracy of your statement is chilling.
2 posted on 10/07/2006 9:26:04 PM PDT by kinoxi (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

I'm confused (which is nothing new :). Did this come from the WaPo or pmsnbc?


3 posted on 10/07/2006 9:30:22 PM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

MSNBC hosted an article from the Washington Post.


4 posted on 10/07/2006 9:31:33 PM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
The vast majority of the injuries are light and the vast, vast majoirty of the injured return to duty, this report is full of lies and distortions. Expect this report to be trumpeted in the next few days by liberals and their media.
5 posted on 10/07/2006 9:32:54 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

"I see," said the blind man. Thanks!


6 posted on 10/07/2006 9:40:48 PM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

They know the American people, as a whole, don't understand what the word "casualty" means. People will read the headline and assume US soldiers are dying left and right as they vote for the Al Qaida demonrats.


7 posted on 10/07/2006 9:41:15 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

The three biggest news sources that have been the most on the most anti war streak of late have been NBC, Newsweek and the Washington Post.

The Simes is a communist rag that shouldn't be considered news anymore.


8 posted on 10/07/2006 9:44:45 PM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Agree, but their tricks did not work in the past and it will not work now. The 2004 elections was ALL ABOUT DOOM AND GLOOM FROM IRAQ and at the end liberals and their media failed miserably. The majority of voters are much smarter than what liberals and their media think about them, and that is one main reason liberals are losing one election after another.
9 posted on 10/07/2006 9:47:08 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Agree, but their tricks did not work in the past and it will not work now. The 2004 elections was ALL ABOUT DOOM AND GLOOM FROM IRAQ

This election is now about fags in Florida. I am not exaggerating, this is where it stands.
10 posted on 10/07/2006 9:51:11 PM PDT by kinoxi (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
This election is now about fags in Florida.

That's what the MSM and the Rats want it to be about, but in the minds of most Americans, it's not, and the Rats are gonna lose again.

11 posted on 10/07/2006 9:55:20 PM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

And that is why we will keep our control of Congress. Our voters, including the "values voters" are smart enough to know that the sins of one man does not effect a whole party that has advanced the cause of pro-life and other social values through many laws, at the contrary our base knows very well that the democrat party is the party of abortionists, gay agenda, and other despicable social agendas that will destroy our society if they have the power to implement it.


12 posted on 10/07/2006 9:56:08 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
"The number of U.S. troops wounded in Iraq has surged to its highest level in nearly two years..."

Our troops have been placed between the parties of a civil war, as policemen, and both parties (sunni and shia) have American blood on their hands. I'm beginning to think the Iraq war is more about saving face now than it is about killing islamofacists. We need to redefine the enemy and open up the 'rules of engagement' if we are to fight and win this war. As it is now we are fighting a PC war to impress a watchful world and media, which plays right into the hands of the enemy. We have become so arrogant, (or stupid), that we think we can go to war and win without giving our best efforts.

13 posted on 10/07/2006 9:56:37 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

those troops may have be redeployed east soon. The problem with Iraq lies in Damascus and Tehran. once Iran goes, it's puppet will too.


14 posted on 10/07/2006 9:59:30 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Why doesn't someone point out that in WWII, when we invaded Iwo Jima and Okinawa, our casualties rose sharply.

Just before we won the freakin' war.

This is not quid pro quo.
15 posted on 10/07/2006 10:08:48 PM PDT by outdriving (Diversity is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outdriving

More Americans were killed in Europe in 1945 than in 1944. What year did the war end? MSM spin with no historical context at all. Shocking I know.


16 posted on 10/07/2006 10:34:34 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
the effort to stave off full-scale civil war in Iraq

What about the full-scale civil war in FRANCE? They never talk about that one.

17 posted on 10/07/2006 10:36:40 PM PDT by jwalburg (It wasn't the Executive that Thomas Jefferson referred to as "the Despotic Branch.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Doesn't fit the template.


18 posted on 10/07/2006 10:41:51 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: outdriving
Why doesn't someone point out that in WWII, when we invaded Iwo Jima and Okinawa, our casualties rose sharply

You are right.

When the American forces attacked Okinawa , April 1, 1945 – June 21, 1945, we suffered 12,500 KIA or missing in action and 38,000 combat wounded and 33,000 non combat wounded. We lost 33 ships, and 763 aircraft.

We killed 110,000 of the enemy. We sank 16 of his ships and destroyed 7,800 of his aircraft. Less than 2 months later, on August 15th 1945, the war ended with a bang in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

It is darkest before the dawn.

19 posted on 10/07/2006 10:44:44 PM PDT by ARE SOLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE
Why doesn't someone point out that in WWII, when we invaded Iwo Jima and Okinawa, our casualties rose sharply


No one said anything then because we won those battles, we took the territory, we showed no mercy. Today we handcuff our troops with KGC war-fighting rules, and instead of fighting for Real Freedom we are supporting a constitution that states that - No law shall contradict islam.

Those hundreds of wounded did not have to be. We should be leveling these places from the air and not losing one single man doing it. But instead President Bush has allowed our troops to become Iraq's police force.

No more blood for islam. They need to do Freedom our way or not expect us to pay WITH OUR billions and OUR BLOOD.
20 posted on 10/07/2006 11:01:15 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson