Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last-minute bill changes funding for border fence
Washington Post ^ | Oct 6, 2006 | Spencer S. Hsu

Posted on 10/06/2006 6:49:47 AM PDT by engrpat

WASHINGTON - No sooner did Congress authorize construction of a 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexico border last week than lawmakers rushed to approve separate legislation that ensures it will never be built, at least not as advertised, according to Republican lawmakers and immigration experts.

GOP leaders have singled out the fence as one of the primary accomplishments of the recently completed session. Many lawmakers plan to highlight their $1.2 billion down payment on its construction as they campaign in the weeks before the midterm elections.

But shortly before recessing late Friday, the House and Senate gave the Bush administration leeway to distribute the money to a combination of projects -- not just the physical barrier along the southern border. The funds may also be spent on roads, technology and "tactical infrastructure" to support the Homeland Security Department's preferred option of a "virtual fence."

What's more, in a late-night concession to win over wavering Republicans, GOP congressional leaders pledged in writing that American Indian tribes, members of Congress, governors and local leaders would get a say in "the exact placement" of any structure, and that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff would have the flexibility to use alternatives "when fencing is ineffective or impractical."

The loopholes leave the Bush administration with authority to decide where, when and how long a fence will be built, except for small stretches east of San Diego and in western Arizona. Homeland Security officials have proposed a fence half as long, lawmakers said.

This case reflects political calculations by GOP strategists that voters do not mind the details, and that key players -- including the administration, local leaders and the Mexican government -- oppose a fence-only approach, analysts said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; betrayal; border; bush; bushamnesty; congress; fence; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; invasion; invasionusa; mexico; quislings; sellout; virtualfence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Dog Gone
Looks like there is a bit of a natural barrier there.

But since there is only funding for 700 miles of fence, stripping that money off the roll for other projects may leave areas that are an easy walk across wide open.

21 posted on 10/06/2006 7:37:35 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: engrpat

"...governors and local leaders would get a say in "the exact placement" of any structure."

WTF? Put it on the doted line that is the border, where else?


22 posted on 10/06/2006 7:38:07 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The best thing for that area would be armed minutemen. Its stupid that we can't fire warning shots at people entering the country. You might be sued. They would surely turn around and think again about entering the country illegally. We just got played big time by our own party. How disgusting. Guess i am going to be spending the weekend writing letters.
23 posted on 10/06/2006 7:39:29 AM PDT by ritewingwarrior (Where does free speech end, and sedition begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Regardless if the analyst is a Republican or Democrat the statement does have a solid ring of truth. So many times congress has passed something, tooted their horn and then on the sly pass another bill to destroy the first. How many Republicans will be running on the new bill? Not very many!
24 posted on 10/06/2006 7:40:24 AM PDT by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0929border-fence0929.html

Another change would give the Department of Homeland Security more authority to decide where to put the fence. Still another would allow vehicle barriers, sensors and cameras to count toward the 700-mile total.


25 posted on 10/06/2006 7:41:49 AM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Would you demand a fence on this stretch of the Texas/Mexican border?'

You win,
I'd settle for piranha.

26 posted on 10/06/2006 7:49:28 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

The Mexican government, Vicente, has more say in this administration than the American citizen.
How does that feel?


27 posted on 10/06/2006 7:51:28 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: norton

LOL


28 posted on 10/06/2006 7:51:54 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Virtual fence is a real nothing.

The only real thing about a "virtual fence" are the wasted tax dollars.

The republicans in congress are apparently on a death wish. I will still vote for the turkeys only to support and continue the WOT. God have mercy on this country.

29 posted on 10/06/2006 8:04:10 AM PDT by Maynerd (New Middle East policy - less troops more nukes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sheana


The Mexican government, Vicente, has more say in this administration than the American citizen.
How does that feel? "

YEEESH!


30 posted on 10/06/2006 8:06:52 AM PDT by RoadTest (and so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake - Deut. 9.19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fee

"Even worst, it allows a Dem President to use the loop holes to delay the fence until enough legal Mexican immigrants become citizens and tip the electoral balance in key states (CA, TX, etc)."

---and the national Catholic/Protestant balance?


31 posted on 10/06/2006 8:09:52 AM PDT by RoadTest (and so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake - Deut. 9.19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
IMHO, the politicos in Washington, on both side of the fence, know there's no way we're gonna approve the North American Union. So they've decided to get it done via incrementialism, a tiny step at a time.

This is a tiny step.

Our country is changing before our eyes. But they are changing it so slowly that 90-95% of us can't see it. 30-40 years from now "our" country will be dead and gone forever.

Glad I'm an old fart. The kids of today are not going to have an easy time of it. Very depressing.

32 posted on 10/06/2006 8:15:23 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Eh, we had a good run. We let the elites take over, we deserve what's coming.


33 posted on 10/06/2006 8:33:59 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


34 posted on 10/06/2006 8:41:03 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: engrpat

Figures, you know theyd find a way to screw us.


35 posted on 10/06/2006 8:46:40 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

We will be lucky if the next POTUS is about as conservative as Hillary, face it the fix was in from the get go.


36 posted on 10/06/2006 8:49:54 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Eh, we had a good run. We let the elites take over, we deserve what's coming.

As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger, "What you mean by 'we' Kemo Sabe?"

37 posted on 10/06/2006 9:02:18 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fee

I think you about covered it.


38 posted on 10/06/2006 9:02:25 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Our troops will send all of the worlds terrorists to hell in a handbasket with no virgins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Told ya there was never going to be a fence erected.


39 posted on 10/06/2006 9:22:01 AM PDT by Eaker (Dix, TexasCowboy and Flyer all now live in the next best place to Texas . .. Heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
"Looks like we got had again by our own guys."

Election hasn't been held yet, either.

40 posted on 10/06/2006 9:24:51 AM PDT by azhenfud (an enigma between two parentheses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson