To: Laissez-faire capitalist
And she does not want Louis Freeh to investigate.
I bet they knew long before Denny Hastert did.
3 posted on
10/05/2006 4:35:00 PM PDT by
msnimje
(Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
To: msnimje
Not only knew about it..probably .Managed the leaks.
28 posted on
10/05/2006 5:02:40 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: msnimje
Doesn't matter. The damage is done here. The drive-bys will beat this drum until Election Day. I hope to God I'm wrong, but get ready for the Congress from Hell come January.
46 posted on
10/05/2006 6:10:30 PM PDT by
Uncle Vlad
(You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
To: msnimje
To: msnimje
Looks like Pelosi is imploding.
If Pelosi is innocent, why not give a sworn statement?
53 posted on
10/05/2006 6:20:53 PM PDT by
Dante3
To: msnimje
I bet they knew long before Denny Hastert did.Yet, Hastert remains in the MSM's crosshairs. "What did he not know, and when did he not know it?" I honestly believe they think that is a valid question.
54 posted on
10/05/2006 6:21:46 PM PDT by
small voice in the wilderness
(The dems. can't have a fool-proof plan. There would be no one left in their base.)
To: msnimje
Of course they did. Too bad this article isn't in the NYTimes.
To: msnimje
So why aren't the republicans out in the media saying this,and will the investigation be done by the election ,if not it's useless.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson