Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GayPatriot:STOP THE GAY STAFFER WITCHHUNT(Gays in Panic Over Foley Backlash!!)
GayPatriot ^ | 10/04/06 | GayPatriot

Posted on 10/04/2006 4:50:58 PM PDT by tcrlaf

Anyone and everyone — Republican or Democrat – who is involved in the effort on Capitol Hill to purge gay Republican staffers using “The List” needs to cease this outing witchhunt immediately.

Please call the Capitol Hill offices of House Speaker Hastert, Senate Majority Leader Frist as well as House Minority Leader Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.

Demand that they issue a statement calling on all House and Senate Members and their staff to stop this outing campaign immediately.

This type of behavior is un-American. If the Human Rights Campaign, Log Cabin Republicans or the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force won’t stand up to this witchhunt atmosphere, then we sure will here.

HASTERT: 202-225-2976 PELOSI: 202-225-4965 FRIST: 202-224-3344 REID: 202-224-3524


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; democrats; foley; gay; getbackinthecloset; homosexualagenda; keepgaysawayfromkids; keepgyasoutofschools; panic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 next last
To: AFA-Michigan; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Balke; BigFinn; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Ongoing discussion about political/other ramifications of the maddog Democrat "outing" of so-called conservative homosexuals.

Anyone else disturbed about Mehlman? I am not happy that a homosexual is the head of the RNC or whatever he is. Aren't there enough normal men/women?

Freepmail me and/or wagglebee if you want on/off this pinglist.


161 posted on 10/07/2006 9:53:33 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; wagglebee; P-Marlowe

Go here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1715413/posts

My opinion is that the homosexuals should be above board about their homosexuality. If it doesn't injure the outreach of the party in that particular job, then so be it. But if it is going to result in political fallout, then let them and everyone else with skeletons in their closets NOT step forward to run for office.

I don't care what it is. That's why conservatives should be extremely cautious supporting Newt for the presidency. His baggage could hurt no matter how good a guy he is.

A football coach needs to know if his q'back is secretly nursing a hernia. The victory of the team depends on honesty.


162 posted on 10/07/2006 11:02:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: xzins

IOW, character counts more than some kind of political "skill".


"I pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great
man that was not at the same time truly virtuous."

-- Benjamin Franklin (The Busy-body, No. 3, 18 February 1728)


163 posted on 10/07/2006 11:13:41 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

"Anyone else disturbed about Mehlman? I am not happy that a homosexual is the head of the RNC or whatever he is. Aren't there enough normal men/women?"

YES VERY. There is a doctor, Dr. Laura Schlesinger, who has made the point without any doubt that there is a BRAIN DIFFERENCE with the people, who practice homosexuality and child molestation, than those who are NORMAL. This is no news to you or anyone else.

Quote from this doctor: "How many letters have I read on the air from gay men who acknowledge that a huge portion of the male homosexual populace is predatory on young boys?"

And the homosexuals had her banned from her own television show which was cancelled.

It shows something, that the homosexuals will attack and destroy each other, in the Republican Party, and also in the Left. Aside from anything else they are a weak point, that some homosexuals begin a fight and damage the party that they are in.

If for instance the Massachusetts Republican party, had much infighting and tendency to fight in harmful ways, why would we want Massachusetts Republicans at high level, where they could fight and destroy the whole party? Is that offensive or self-protection?

The Democrats made it clear that to look like a normal American, and you did not fit in, sorry. Is this such a formula for success, the Republican Party should imitate it too? Should we also be disgusting to the average American person just as much?


164 posted on 10/07/2006 3:38:50 PM PDT by Nickey (Is Frist A French name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: quietolong

"Fuchs was part of the British team sent here to work on the bomb. And what university did he come from? Why the one were McLean & Burgess were at. Think maybe they had a hand in him getting on the team?
Also they want the type of government the USSR had. Get in a office of power you can do what you want. Remember the leader of the Brownshirts was Rohm he and his top aids were homos."

Yes and you know, some Republicans are very kind and gentle People, and wishing to look the other way about homosexuals. This Mark Foley had Congressional experience, what is to say that in two years or six years, everything else not being seen, he is thought about for Cabinet position, or President? What are we doing then? What are his security risks if he is Secretary of State in Cabinet in six years, who can blackmail him? Or is the world our friend, no bad operatives would seek to blackmail?


165 posted on 10/07/2006 3:47:43 PM PDT by Nickey (Is Frist A French name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

"GayPatriot, the anonymous gay Republican blogger, has officially signed off. In a statement, no explanation was given.
...
GayPatriot was silenced.
....
GayPatriot formed specifically in response to Rogers and his website and became a venue for criticism of outing Republicans. GayPatriot is currently in counsel with attorneys over this entire matter."

Yes well in the battles within homosexual community, GayPatriot wanted to oppose the Democrats' brownshirt homosexuals, and that is a good thing.

But it is not my battle, sorry.

The more of them who are exposed, the healthier America becomes, whether Left or "right".


166 posted on 10/07/2006 3:52:02 PM PDT by Nickey (Is Frist A French name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

LOL


167 posted on 10/07/2006 4:46:52 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nickey

Recruiters in our ranks?


168 posted on 10/08/2006 12:43:35 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
The reason the KGB would look for homos was not to blackmail them but to give them what they wanted. “ You want a little boy..No problem...Just give us the......” Also they want the type of government the USSR had. Get in a office of power you can do what you want. Remember the leader of the Brownshirts was Rohm he and his top aids were homos

And in today's environment, Saudi Arabia (and certain other Muslim counties) is very much in a position to supply favored people with luxury apartments stocked with the sexual slave of preference

169 posted on 10/08/2006 6:43:18 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

I agree. A "queer Republican" is a contradiction in terms; any that are still in the closet need to be rooted out NOW.


170 posted on 10/08/2006 7:32:19 AM PDT by Gorobei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

Comment #171 Removed by Moderator

To: tcrlaf

Bump with no comment.


172 posted on 10/08/2006 8:35:23 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecrow2006

btt


173 posted on 10/08/2006 9:02:44 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

I sure hope they realize this sooner or later. it is the democrats who supposedly adore them who are doing this.


174 posted on 10/08/2006 10:23:27 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Recall

The "names" are gone... wonder why?


175 posted on 10/09/2006 7:48:38 AM PDT by GOPJ (Rich liberal Hollywood narcissists- 30,000 letters telling people not to watch movies just went out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nickey
"That Alger Hiss was a homosexual."

I have read almost every reliable book and article there is about the Chambers/Hiss case, and have seen nothing anywhere to indicate that Alger Hiss was homosexual. His young step son was (and troubled about it too, which was why he was never questioned about contacts during his youth between the Chamberses and the Hisses, though he would have remembered them. He was left out of the case by investigators on both sides.), and Chambers admittedly (to the FBI) was, (Chambers later reformed himself out of his homosexual life) but not Hiss.

176 posted on 10/09/2006 9:45:13 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
"The Rosenbergs got a raw deal on the A-bomb as compared to the others. They didn’t steal the A-bomb plans. One of the central figures who did steal the plans was Klaus Fuchs. And what did he get? He got to head his own lab!"

The Rosenbergs did not get a raw deal. The Russians ran two agents (at least two) acquiring parallel sources of information on the bomb. One was Fuchs, one was the Rosenberg brother-in-law recruited by the Rosenbergs). The Russians used them as checks on each other regarding the veracity and quality of the information they were getting from each one.

177 posted on 10/09/2006 10:00:47 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

That's funny.

Since I posted that, others on FR have posted the actual list. So the actual names are around here "somewhere" if your curious.

The only ones I see going nuts are Gay Liberals. The list didn't get the desired response. Conservatives aren't on a witch hunt and Christians will still vote in November.


178 posted on 10/09/2006 10:26:31 AM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Recall

Actually, the liberals are the witch hunters... some how I'm not surprised ...


179 posted on 10/09/2006 12:16:17 PM PDT by GOPJ (Rich Hollywood Entertraitors: - 30,000 letters telling people not to watch movies just went out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Yep, and these are the same people that were the "thought police" during the Clinton years.


180 posted on 10/09/2006 12:22:06 PM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson