Posted on 10/02/2006 11:34:51 PM PDT by HAL9000
Excerpt -
SÃO JOSE DOS CAMPOS, Brazil, Oct. 1 It had been an uneventful, comfortable flight.With the window shade drawn, I was relaxing in my leather seat aboard a $25 million corporate jet that was flying 37,000 feet above the vast Amazon rainforest. The 7 of us on board the 13-passenger jet were keeping to ourselves.
Without warning, I felt a terrific jolt and heard a loud bang, followed by an eerie silence, save for the hum of the engines.
~ snip ~
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TCAS should have caught this one.
It all depends on what got hit/damaged on the 737.
Meant to ping you.
A giant leap in aviation safety.
ping
We may never know but some possibilities:
Severed control cables and or damaged control surfaces.
Rapid decompression.
Unrecoverable attitude after attempted evasive maneuver.
Combination of all of the above.
It could have even been the cockpit that ate the wing tip.
Yup.
"It's possible that the evasive maneuver was forced before the autopilot could be turned off. If so, then it is possible that the autopilot fought with the human pilot...potentially fatal."
Nah. The 737 autopilot disengages automatically, even if the disengage button is not depressed. Handy feature, that one.
As to "been there, done that...lived to tell about it.", even if you think you can prove that I did those things..............
"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything!"
-Bart Simpson
ping #13 and #17
Can you image his call to his editor on this one - "Wait'll you hear what I'm writing about this week..."
BTW, this article is first-rate journalism. And the NYTimes has this guy freelance writing for the Travel section???
So what are the rules as far as altitude go? I thought they assigned you an altitude and you stayed at it +-500ft? But the Deutsche Presse-Agentur article here says that the Embraer was assigned a 4,000' window?
the nyt? is this story accurate?
Trust but verify. I wonder what the FDR and CVR will have to say.
Great read bump.
Apparently one aircraft was assigned a block altitude. That entire block was thus reserved. The controller who gave an altitude inside this block to opposing traffic caused this crash!
One heck of a story
"IMPACT. IMPACT. IMPACT. EVADE. EVADE. EVADE."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.