Skip to comments.
WASHINGTON TIMES ON TUESDAY WILL CALL FOR SPEAKER HASTERT'S RESIGNATION
Drudge ^
| October 2, 2006
| MD
Posted on 10/02/2006 6:26:51 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
Edited on 10/02/2006 7:05:39 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
WASHINGTON TIMES ON TUESDAY WILL CALL FOR SPEAKER HASTERT'S RESIGNATION, NEWSROOM SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING... Editorial titled: 'Resign, Mr. Speaker': 'House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once... Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance'... -- Washington Times, October 3, 2006...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foley; hastert; pedaphiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 541-542 next last
Comment #261 Removed by Moderator
To: Roscoe Karns
If true.. this is indeed news..
262
posted on
10/02/2006 7:41:47 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
To: muawiyah
Using his position as a Congressman to refuse to cooperate with a Federal investigation into his wrong doing is not a threat?
Had I been caught taking bribes and refused to assist the FBI in their investigation I fully expect them to raid my offices too.
263
posted on
10/02/2006 7:42:25 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
To: BurbankKarl
So is the plan to release one a week till Nov. 7th?
To: holdonnow
3. Be aggressive about how Dems will -- and are -- protecting children.There is so much here. but for starters how does one justify questioning small children about things like "do you touch yourself and how does it feel?" How is it protective of children to insist that homosexuals be allowed to be scout leaders.
265
posted on
10/02/2006 7:43:26 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
To: 60Gunner
I took a helluva lot of heat from people about my opinion on Hastert in my post. I see the same vitriol here from the same crowd.Stop whining.
To: BurbankKarl
Yep, cocktail party conservatives stood up unjustly against the Republican speaker of the House so they will appeal further more to their liberal coktail party friends. F*** them if they were that good, Bill Sammon their most famous reporter would not have left them.
267
posted on
10/02/2006 7:43:39 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: bigeasy_70118
I hate to take issue with someone from my home state, but I don't agree with a lot that you have had to say. If you were born and reared in Louisiana then you have to be aware that our State is not recognized as having honest government. You sound like a petulant child who when things don't go your way, you pick up your toys and go home. I don't mean this to be a condemnation of you, but what have you done to help the Republican Party "get things right"? I don't agree with everything that's being done, but I don't think "jumping ship" is going to help the nation. The Democrats and Libertarians don't have a thing to offer that will turn this nation around! With Democrats, you will get more corruption and control than you can imagine, and a vote for a Libertarian is just a vote for a Democrat.
We mock the blacks for staying on Democrat plantation. Are we really any different? Additionally, I am begining to change my views on gay marriage. I probably could support some type of civil compact between monogomous gays that allows them community property rights and inheritance rights, and entitles them to health benefits from their employers. I mean society as we know probably wouldn't collapse.
Have you read this statement thoroughly? I don't know who you're talking about when you say, "We mock blacks for staying on Democrat plantation." I don't mock them; I feel sorry for them for allowing themselves to be used by Democrats. Democrats have used them for their votes, but they have not helped them better themselves...the Republicans have though. I notice you are changing your views on other matters also. Could you be becoming another flip flop artist? Why don't you stay and help us make the Republican Party a better Party instead of trying to hurt the Party?
To: nutmeg
Thanks. I was just about to ping you having just read it on Drudge. Thought the "October surprise" was supposed to come from our team. Another nail biting November in store for us!
269
posted on
10/02/2006 7:43:53 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: tutstar
The "page" who was quoted says ABC misunderstood. He was not "warned" about Foley, he was told that Foley was a "bit odd", which I assume means someone was warning them that Foley was gay.
Girls naturally know not to get too friendly with older men. But Boys don't know that unless you warn them.
To: jrooney
A lot of IM programs archive messages by default....
To: VictoryGal; Narrowback
The meaning of the emails, sent a year ago, is only really apparant, and actionable, once you know about the Instant Messages, sent three years ago.
Then the pedophile grooming process becomes apparant.
So, for anybody to think the emails were exceptionally "creepy" they'd already had to have knowledge of the Instant Messages.
I'm just guessing you knew about them a long time ago but simply failed to report them to appropriate law enforcement.
To: OldFriend
Everyone is assuming that the Drudge report is accurate. Let's wait and see.
273
posted on
10/02/2006 7:45:14 PM PDT
by
Carolinamom
("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
To: dan1123
Save the conspiracy theories for the DNC. If Hastert did wrong, let him swing. Why should the fact that it's a month away from election alter our party's willingness to adhere to certain ethical principles.
274
posted on
10/02/2006 7:45:29 PM PDT
by
60Gunner
(A beautiful woman who lacks self control is like a gold ring in a pig's snout.)
To: bray
Hastert said clearly he never saw or knew of these e-mails. He has not lied before and is assumed truthful until proven otherwise No .. he said he never knew of the IM's
The libs are trying to blur and confuse people into thinking the emails and the IM's are the same thing
275
posted on
10/02/2006 7:45:45 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
To: JCEccles
Give Hastert the benefit of the doubt? Come on! This is feeding frenzy time. Go ahead and take a chunk out of Hastert . . . or Rumsfeld . . . or Bush. It's what all the trendy conservatives are doing tonight. YEE HAW!!! I'm with you, brother. Let's get out the knives. Let's carve each other up, and anyone else we can find in the Republican party. That'll show them RATs!!
276
posted on
10/02/2006 7:45:52 PM PDT
by
NurdlyPeon
(Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
To: BurbankKarl
I do not know enough about that myself but from everything I read and heard today was jsut the opposite of what you stated.
277
posted on
10/02/2006 7:45:54 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: BurbankKarl
Not by default and not for years. I believe these were copied and saved.
To: JerseyDvl
279
posted on
10/02/2006 7:46:41 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jennyjenny
I don't think this is going to help the RAT party at all, if anything it will hurt them in some way.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 541-542 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson