Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hastert: Who(Which Dems) Had Foley's IMs for Three Years?
Rush Limbaugh ^ | 10/02/06 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/02/2006 5:41:31 PM PDT by paltz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: Chunga
You're full of gas.

The poster is full of something, it's more than just gas though.

121 posted on 10/02/2006 9:32:55 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: madison10; gardencatz

See post #119.


122 posted on 10/02/2006 9:33:21 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
how did the kid (and I presume, his parents) contact the DNC and the media, did he log these sessions "innocently"? was he a plant to lure Foley all along?

I'm in no way trying to excuse Foley, but I'm beginning to ask myself these same questions because there is too much "evidence" popping up. In the past, I've been told to never take an IM log as proof of anything because they can be so easily faked. Are we even sure that these are all true logs?

I think it's clear that Foley is guilty of showing too much interest in some pages, but as disgusted as I am with him, I would be even more disgusted and outraged if people are lying and faking evidence to put more nails in his coffin.

123 posted on 10/02/2006 9:34:20 PM PDT by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

Was the page FROM San Diego and Foley went to see him there when he was a page? How could a young page travel to San Diego on his own to meet up with Foley there? or are we speaking about someone who was several years beyond "page age" when he met up with Foley? I'm doubting the authenticity of the IMs, but that's just me.

The "page" that the IMs were written to is probably 19 or 20 by now, maybe older.


124 posted on 10/02/2006 9:39:44 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

Thanks for the clarification, btw. :)


125 posted on 10/02/2006 9:40:56 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: madison10

If the IM's were false, Foley would not have resigned. The emails he fought, but when the IM's came out he immediately resigned. He could say that they were false if in fact they were false, but he has not. I don't see why this is an issue. The issue is whether the House leadership knew about the IMs- all evidence points to no, they only knew about the E-Mails.


126 posted on 10/02/2006 9:44:40 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18

Guess I'm hoping for a smoking gun full of blanks. Foley is totally guilty and that's that...


127 posted on 10/02/2006 9:50:25 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Was the page FROM San Diego and Foley went to see him there when he was a page?

I haven't a clue but I'm sure more and more will be revealed in the days ahead.

128 posted on 10/02/2006 9:53:20 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
Lets talk Party and principle.

Dems have a man in the White House with credible accusations of rape and sexual harassment leveled against him among other accusations. He is defended.

Republicans have a fruity guy, Foley, that they are wary of. No law against being "Fruity". But they get concrete information he is hounding teenage boys, and he is GONE.

We cant say that about Barny Franks, can we? STILL TICKING...

So what party stands on principle? Tell me, please.
129 posted on 10/02/2006 9:56:31 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
You know, I'm sure you believe all of that too.

But if you think that his colleagues were completely clueless, I feel sorry for your naivete.

I think they knew and did nothing because they couldn't risk the scandal. Just wait and I'll be proven correct. If not I'll be happy to eat crow but I've never had to yet and I've been at this game a helluva long time.
130 posted on 10/02/2006 10:10:03 PM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Thanks for the link.

This is NOT good, but what's even worse, is that someone had this stuff and sat on it for years; only to release it now.

131 posted on 10/02/2006 11:10:05 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Hugh Hewitt pointed out, and maybe it's already posted, that whoever held the IM's should be prosecuted for conspiracy, since failure to report is participation in the crime.


132 posted on 10/02/2006 11:20:19 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
Oh you'll eat crow, alright, and many people here are going to help you do so, by force feeding it to you...all icy cold.

And keep things on the thread; DON'T us FREEPmail for what it is not supposed to be for!

133 posted on 10/02/2006 11:21:26 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

Hewitt is correct and I hope the FBI is breathing down the neck/s of that person/people, as we type.


134 posted on 10/02/2006 11:22:54 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

What pisses me off though is when peole pop off without all the facts.............


http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2005/fly-story-p1.php


135 posted on 10/02/2006 11:34:27 PM PDT by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

Is there a chance these IM's are fake or created for ill purpose and not by Foley.


136 posted on 10/02/2006 11:48:21 PM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

Well said.


137 posted on 10/03/2006 12:18:28 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( The Shadow of Your Smile --- Anthony Dominick Benedetto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito
Hugh Hewitt pointed out, and maybe it's already posted, that whoever held the IM's should be prosecuted for conspiracy, since failure to report is participation in the crime.

Yes.

138 posted on 10/03/2006 1:13:40 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( The Shadow of Your Smile --- Anthony Dominick Benedetto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
"I have zero sympathy for hypocritical POSs like Foley."

No argument there. In fact, that part seems to be already handled.

The part remaining is to thoroughly investigate the sources and timing of the info release. The 'rats and MSM need to be nailed, if there are also guilty in this. Note that others have pointed out that the ABC reporter/journalist involved in this "investigation" seems to have been involved in the GM pickup rocket motor explosion staged by SeeBS.

139 posted on 10/03/2006 4:06:37 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: paltz

bttt


140 posted on 10/03/2006 4:56:35 AM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson