Skip to comments.
Former page: We knew about Foley 'for years'
TCPalm(Florida) ^
| October 1, 2006
| M.E. SPRENGELMEYER AND AMIE PARNES
Posted on 10/01/2006 7:45:10 AM PDT by Dane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-224 next last
To: Matchett-PI
Do you mean this one?
Section 22-3501 creates a number of sexual offenses when one of the participants is below age 16, which are not offenses if involving only persons over 16.
101
posted on
10/01/2006 9:12:12 AM PDT
by
onyx
(We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
To: onyx
His correspondence was TOTALLY inappropriate. Of course. And good riddance to Foley.
Now, what about that selective and most curious Democratic and drive-by media outrage over the sexual peccadilloes of a politician and his teenage intern?
Ah, the stories that a sink just off the Oval Office could tell if it could but speak . . . .
102
posted on
10/01/2006 9:12:25 AM PDT
by
JCEccles
("Islam. No religion demands more of others and less of itself.")
To: onyx
Oh yeah --- their self righteousness is over whelming and Barney the pimp factory is still in Congress. 'Pimp factory' is right! lol!
Let's not forget about the KKK Byrd either. That is also a double standard!
103
posted on
10/01/2006 9:12:58 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Dane
well Mr Former Page, why didn't you say anything about it if it was so well known? Apparently the pages, the MSM, and the RATS all knew about it for years. The House GOP leadership were the only ones in the dark about it. When they found out about Foley, they got rid of him immediately. They should be applauded for their actions, instead they're being demonized. Typical liberal tactics.
104
posted on
10/01/2006 9:13:59 AM PDT
by
balch3
To: JCEccles
Yep --- " selective and most curious " media and democrat outrage are truly breathtaking. I love your wording.
105
posted on
10/01/2006 9:15:00 AM PDT
by
onyx
(We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
To: Dane
If Foley were a democrat, we would all be homophobes
To: onyx
No difference between a 16 year old boy or a 16 year old girl, so says the law. And if not for the law, there'd be no difference between a 14 year old or a 16 year old.
For a married old man, any prey still in high school classifies him as a pedophile in my book.........The pervert is lucky I'm not the kids dad because I would sure make his life hell without even laying a hand on him......
107
posted on
10/01/2006 9:16:06 AM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(Cure for Islamo-Fascism: Louisville Slugger, apply directly to the forehead!)
To: Paine's Ghost
If Foley were a democrat, we would all be homophobesIn reality, given the Democrats charges, they are the homophobes. They seem to think Foley should have been investigated over non-explicit emails with a former page, that brought no formal complaint or charges. Apparently, because he was gay, the Republicans should have known that he was doing much worse.
108
posted on
10/01/2006 9:20:01 AM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: Hot Tabasco
Oh no, Sheila Jackson Lee is on Fox News now and she is saddened by the way the leaders in the house handled this problem.
She knows exactly what to do.
To: Dane
I have a question: why isn't Foley in jail? If that were you or me, we would have been arrested by now.
110
posted on
10/01/2006 9:22:15 AM PDT
by
SheLion
("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
To: Dane
The details are still being sorted, but a lady reporter on FoxNews said this:
Email and IM exchanges between Foley and pages were after the pages left DC.
Emails were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were aware. Emails were deemed friendly but not overly sexual in nature.
IMs were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were NOT aware of the IMs. IMs have since been deemed overly friendly and sexual in nature.
Florida officials are reviewing whether any formal charges may be made against Foley.
[This may all hinge on the age of consent laws in the states where the pages 'received' the IMs. That is 16 in DC & Florida - but Florida has an age-differential consideration, 17 in Louisiana. It varies.]
111
posted on
10/01/2006 9:22:27 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Hot Tabasco
I agree with you. Furthermore, my husband is a psychiatrist and there would be hell for Foley to pay had he propositioned one of our kids, male or female.
112
posted on
10/01/2006 9:22:59 AM PDT
by
onyx
(We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
To: Mr. Jeeves; Dane
DC insiders usually protect their own from these sorts of public disclosures.It would appear that they have been protecting Foley. But every secret like this is bound to come out eventually.
113
posted on
10/01/2006 9:23:19 AM PDT
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: Hot Tabasco
The pervert is lucky I'm not the kids dad because I would sure make his life hell without even laying a hand on him...... You can say that again!
It just *isses me off that DEMOCRATS who covered up for Clinton are now 'outraged' over this. For instance Carol Moseley-Braun was just on Fox News calling this a 'cover-up'.
During the Clinton scandal this is what she said about the Clinton/Lewinsky affair:
Senator Carol Moseley-Braun solemnly observed on Meet the Press that we need to put things in perspective. After all, "Thirty years ago, women couldn't even work in the White House."
114
posted on
10/01/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: BenLurkin
I bet this guy knew ... Barney knows all the muddy roads in Congress.
115
posted on
10/01/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( The Shadow of Your Smile --- Anthony Dominick Benedetto)
To: kcvl
LOL and let's throw in McGreevy.
116
posted on
10/01/2006 9:25:40 AM PDT
by
onyx
(We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
To: ErieGeno
"Loraditch said his friends all thought the messages were disturbing, but they did not report them, either because they did not think the messages posed a serious threat or because they might have worried about career consequences. "
Here's the most important sentence of that article. No one higher up knew because these pages did not report it happening.
To: ruthles; Ex-Democrat Dean; All
118
posted on
10/01/2006 9:27:46 AM PDT
by
kayak
(Praying for MozartLover's son, Jemian's son, all our military, and our President every day!)
To: penelopesire; Dane
"Loraditch said his friends all thought the messages were disturbing, but they did not report them, either because they did not think the messages posed a serious threat or because they might have worried about career consequences."That's reprehensible.
119
posted on
10/01/2006 9:28:06 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Living His life abundantly.)
To: Ex-Democrat Dean
120
posted on
10/01/2006 9:29:13 AM PDT
by
1035rep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-224 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson