Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former page: We knew about Foley 'for years'
TCPalm(Florida) ^ | October 1, 2006 | M.E. SPRENGELMEYER AND AMIE PARNES

Posted on 10/01/2006 7:45:10 AM PDT by Dane

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-224 next last
To: Matchett-PI

Do you mean this one?

Section 22-3501 creates a number of sexual offenses when one of the participants is below age 16, which are not offenses if involving only persons over 16.


101 posted on 10/01/2006 9:12:12 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: onyx
His correspondence was TOTALLY inappropriate.

Of course. And good riddance to Foley.

Now, what about that selective and most curious Democratic and drive-by media outrage over the sexual peccadilloes of a politician and his teenage intern?

Ah, the stories that a sink just off the Oval Office could tell if it could but speak . . . .

102 posted on 10/01/2006 9:12:25 AM PDT by JCEccles ("Islam. No religion demands more of others and less of itself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Oh yeah --- their self righteousness is over whelming and Barney the pimp factory is still in Congress.

'Pimp factory' is right! lol!

Let's not forget about the KKK Byrd either. That is also a double standard!

103 posted on 10/01/2006 9:12:58 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dane

well Mr Former Page, why didn't you say anything about it if it was so well known? Apparently the pages, the MSM, and the RATS all knew about it for years. The House GOP leadership were the only ones in the dark about it. When they found out about Foley, they got rid of him immediately. They should be applauded for their actions, instead they're being demonized. Typical liberal tactics.


104 posted on 10/01/2006 9:13:59 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Yep --- " selective and most curious " media and democrat outrage are truly breathtaking. I love your wording.


105 posted on 10/01/2006 9:15:00 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dane
If Foley were a democrat, we would all be homophobes
106 posted on 10/01/2006 9:15:19 AM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
No difference between a 16 year old boy or a 16 year old girl, so says the law. And if not for the law, there'd be no difference between a 14 year old or a 16 year old.

For a married old man, any prey still in high school classifies him as a pedophile in my book.........The pervert is lucky I'm not the kids dad because I would sure make his life hell without even laying a hand on him......

107 posted on 10/01/2006 9:16:06 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Cure for Islamo-Fascism: Louisville Slugger, apply directly to the forehead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paine's Ghost
If Foley were a democrat, we would all be homophobes

In reality, given the Democrats charges, they are the homophobes. They seem to think Foley should have been investigated over non-explicit emails with a former page, that brought no formal complaint or charges. Apparently, because he was gay, the Republicans should have known that he was doing much worse.

108 posted on 10/01/2006 9:20:01 AM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Oh no, Sheila Jackson Lee is on Fox News now and she is saddened by the way the leaders in the house handled this problem.

She knows exactly what to do.


109 posted on 10/01/2006 9:20:54 AM PDT by fabriclady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I have a question: why isn't Foley in jail? If that were you or me, we would have been arrested by now.


110 posted on 10/01/2006 9:22:15 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The details are still being sorted, but a lady reporter on FoxNews said this:

Email and IM exchanges between Foley and pages were after the pages left DC.

Emails were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were aware. Emails were deemed friendly but not overly sexual in nature.

IMs were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were NOT aware of the IMs. IMs have since been deemed overly friendly and sexual in nature.

Florida officials are reviewing whether any formal charges may be made against Foley.

[This may all hinge on the age of consent laws in the states where the pages 'received' the IMs. That is 16 in DC & Florida - but Florida has an age-differential consideration, 17 in Louisiana. It varies.]
111 posted on 10/01/2006 9:22:27 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
I agree with you. Furthermore, my husband is a psychiatrist and there would be hell for Foley to pay had he propositioned one of our kids, male or female.
112 posted on 10/01/2006 9:22:59 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves; Dane
DC insiders usually protect their own from these sorts of public disclosures.

It would appear that they have been protecting Foley. But every secret like this is bound to come out eventually.

113 posted on 10/01/2006 9:23:19 AM PDT by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
The pervert is lucky I'm not the kids dad because I would sure make his life hell without even laying a hand on him......

You can say that again!

It just *isses me off that DEMOCRATS who covered up for Clinton are now 'outraged' over this. For instance Carol Moseley-Braun was just on Fox News calling this a 'cover-up'.

During the Clinton scandal this is what she said about the Clinton/Lewinsky affair:

Senator Carol Moseley-Braun solemnly observed on Meet the Press that we need to put things in perspective. After all, "Thirty years ago, women couldn't even work in the White House."

114 posted on 10/01/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I bet this guy knew ...

Barney knows all the muddy roads in Congress.

115 posted on 10/01/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( The Shadow of Your Smile --- Anthony Dominick Benedetto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcvl


LOL and let's throw in McGreevy.


116 posted on 10/01/2006 9:25:40 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ErieGeno

"Loraditch said his friends all thought the messages were disturbing, but they did not report them, either because they did not think the messages posed a serious threat or because they might have worried about career consequences. "


Here's the most important sentence of that article. No one higher up knew because these pages did not report it happening.


117 posted on 10/01/2006 9:26:41 AM PDT by FarRightFanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ruthles; Ex-Democrat Dean; All
NEWBIE HELP: [Links To The Best Help Threads]
118 posted on 10/01/2006 9:27:46 AM PDT by kayak (Praying for MozartLover's son, Jemian's son, all our military, and our President every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; Dane
"Loraditch said his friends all thought the messages were disturbing, but they did not report them, either because they did not think the messages posed a serious threat or because they might have worried about career consequences."

That's reprehensible.

119 posted on 10/01/2006 9:28:06 AM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Democrat Dean

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/673536/posts

Try this thread


120 posted on 10/01/2006 9:29:13 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson