Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Bans Coal and Oil Fired Power Plants (real title: Governor signs scores of bills)
San Jose Mercury News ^ | 9/20/06 | Steven Harmon, Barbara Feder and Paul Rogers

Posted on 09/30/2006 9:29:51 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: All
Question: Once power is on the grid, how does one differentiate between hydro-electricity, solar-electricity, fossil fuel-electricity, wind-electricity and nuclear-electricity?

And how do you seperate it, so that you get only the type you want?

Extension cords to the appropriate power plant?

21 posted on 09/30/2006 10:02:31 AM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

"not only inside California, but outside as well."

How long does Cali expect this to last?
Now they are trying to legislate how the rest of the country acts too?

Maybe when their electric bills go up exponentially, they will get their collective heads out of you know where.


22 posted on 09/30/2006 10:03:18 AM PDT by b fair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Great. Looks like California is going to push the price of NG right back through the roof.


23 posted on 09/30/2006 10:04:35 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Is this an unconstitutional regulation of interstate trade which lies in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal Congress ?

IF the power companies in the state aren't state owned, then yes, you'd better believe it's unconstitutional. Someone needs to call one of the power companies and tell them to sue :)
24 posted on 09/30/2006 10:04:42 AM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
That's why both bills collectively amount to the California Economy Shutdown Act Of 2006. We'll get lots of regulations and get saddled with higher energy and productivity costs.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

25 posted on 09/30/2006 10:06:09 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I read the legislation. It simply sets a benchmark for CO2 emissions. Any new plant cannot have CO2 emissions that exceed those that would occur from a new natural gas fired combined cycle plant.

Natural gas is CH4 (i.e., a bit of carbon and lots of hydrogen). Coal is essentially 100% carbon (excluding the 10% ash and a very wee bit of hydrogen). "Clean Coal" technology reduces emissions of other nasties such as sulphur and nitrogen oxides and mercury as well as pushes efficiency above 45% in combined cycle plants. But you are still burning pure carbon, so there is no way the CO2 emissions from a combined cycle coal fired plant can be less than the CO2 emissions from a combined cycle natural gas fired plant.

In other words, the bill bans new coal fired plants.

The loophole is the long-term financial contract clause. Utilities can simply sign power contracts for durations less than 3 years. That is the reason all three of California's investor-owned utilities supported the bill.


26 posted on 09/30/2006 10:06:51 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I HOPE that these California idiots REALLY enjoy blackout next summer! DO NOT BITCH to the rest of us in hope that we will feel sorry for you. You made your bed, Californians, now lie kin it!


27 posted on 09/30/2006 10:08:27 AM PDT by US Navy guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom


California reading lamp

28 posted on 09/30/2006 10:08:51 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Brown outs? No. Power is fungible.

But they just moved the price of green power...

If I install a solar array in VA, and sell the output to CA, do you think the electrons actually go 3000 miles to supply them? Oh, heck, no.

But I can make a fortune pandering to their idiocy...

And somebody is, I assure you.

29 posted on 09/30/2006 10:10:26 AM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Just wait we will be called on to bail them out of the hole they are digging for themselves. Where is the Gray Davis they deserve? I've concluded that best way to attack liberalism is for Republicans to support and encourage Homeschooling and develop communities apart. Conservative populations are growing faster and will eventually overtake the left permanently in this country if we keep our kids out of public schools (the indoctrination in mediocrity and hedonism camps).
It is too bad Muslims are so radically aligned, conservative Muslims, Christians, Jews, and others who believe in a just moral reasoned society should be working together not attacking each other. We outnumber the vermin so why do we bow down to them and allow their base culture to override ours? I was listening to the radio and Savage was going on about this and he was absolutely right. The subculture is oppressing the culture ascendant, it is like the way AIDs attacks the immune system. It first takes out the ability of the body's ability to identify the disease like the left has attempted to take out the ability for us to identify right, wrong, and truth by turning the idea of Freedom into a spineless wad of mush that means whatever they define it to be.


30 posted on 09/30/2006 10:12:48 AM PDT by Maelstorm (If all ideas are equal then all are crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
This is a "companion bill" to AB 32, the well-known California global warming bill. With SB 1368, California has effectively banned all oil and coal fired power plants, not only inside California, but outside as well. The bill prohibits any utility from entering into a long-term (3 or more years) financial contract for power generated by coal or oil.

I think this law will be struck down. It violates the interstate commerce clause of the US Constitution.

31 posted on 09/30/2006 10:15:32 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

Thanks for your prayers. It is awful here. The Senators in Sacramento are the most whacked-out bunch of Marxists. The Republican/conservatives up there are great, but are totally out-numbered by the brain-addled libs. We are planning to move asap. It's totally disgusting here in So Cal.


32 posted on 09/30/2006 10:15:38 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

It would be an interesting court ruling...interstate trade vs. California EPA....


33 posted on 09/30/2006 10:17:30 AM PDT by EBH (All great truths begin as blasphemies. GB Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
We'll get lots of regulations and get saddled with higher energy and productivity costs.

I was just thinking that - would not this drive up a lot of the agriculture prices of items that are regularly exported to other states and render CA impotent in many crops?

If the prices are no longer competitive with other states because of artificial controls, seems to me that could be devastating to state agriculture.

34 posted on 09/30/2006 10:18:20 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish

They should rename it the California Blackout Bill.

LOL.


35 posted on 09/30/2006 10:18:32 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Which means that most electric available to them is either Gas, HydroElectric or Nuclear.

And we already know where they stand on the Nuclear option..

Remember, they want to take out the dams, as well.

Which leaves them with natural gas. And they don't want an LNG port, either.

Won't be long before heating will be a matter of burning the furniture. And cooling achieved by draping a wet sheet over an open window...

California is doing it to themselves...

36 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:57 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01

California is doing it to themselves...

Yes, but as we all know, things start here and quickly move to other states. How do you bottle up this insanity in CA and prevent it from infecting other states?


37 posted on 09/30/2006 10:45:58 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
natural-gas-fired power plants.

They should have mandated that all electricty come from nuclear plants. In spite of the 'natural' in natural gas, you are still burning stuff.
38 posted on 09/30/2006 11:15:39 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnitak
How does California propose to draw from the grid?

It seems to me that once power plants are part of the grid, all the electricity in the grid becomes fungible.

In other words: Which kilowatt is from which plant?

39 posted on 09/30/2006 11:31:06 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is more a bill to protect the established power companies investments against a drop in energy prices.

Some coal producers were planning a project to build a coal burning plant in Nevada, and selling the power to California at cheaper prices than are currently available.

Not sure what will happen to the coal plant in Utah that the City of LA and other utilites have a piece of.


40 posted on 09/30/2006 11:41:21 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson