Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could we see the Trans-Texas Corridor by 2013?
Waco Tribune-Herald ^ | September 29, 2006 | Dan Genz

Posted on 09/29/2006 6:32:20 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Drivers willing to pay to leave Interstate 35 in the dust could have an alternative as early as the summer of 2013.

For 15 cents a mile, drivers could cruise the proposed Trans-Texas Corridor for nearly 100 miles, from Hillsboro to the north Austin suburbs. The rest of the 370-mile corridor could be running in 2017, the report said.

That is according to a new 1,600-page master plan for the tollway, railroad and utility corridor that the firm Cintra-Zachry developed as it prepares to build the controversial project.

The report said the company’s investment will increase by $3.5 billion, construction could begin in five years, and the McLennan County portion could be operational two years later. However, Texas Department of Transportation officials noted its route, timeline and toll estimates are all likely to be revised as the project goes forward.

“(The master plan) does not set the route, it does not set the toll rate, it does not authorize construction,” agency spokesman Randall Dillard said. “It lays out a public-private partnership on how we could develop TTC 35.”

However, the route Cintra-Zachry used demands attention because it differs significantly from the official, preliminary 10-mile-wide area the state reviewed this summer in 54 public hearings.

The builder’s version feeds almost directly into Dallas/Fort Worth, then loops around to the east, while the official route veers east as early as McLennan County and takes a more gradual arc around the Metroplex.

If the route changes to look more like the builder’s option, it could benefit Hillsboro, where the economy is pinned to Interstate 35 traffic.

“I cannot be tempted to wax eloquent about this map and say, ‘They’re listening to us, we’re having an impact,’ ” Hillsboro Mayor Will Lowrance said. “You cannot draw that kind of conclusion from that document, because it has a disclaimer.”

No matter which route is used, the corridor could influence the travel budgets and traffic for Texas vacations and long commutes.

Drivers filling up at the Czech Stop along I-35 in West greeted the proposal as good news for chronic congestion but bad news for their wallets.

“Whoa, that would increase the cost of my trip to Oklahoma by about $40 each way,” said Barbara Meek, 50, of Austin. “I hope other people decide to pay the tolls and I-35 clears up.”

Motorcycle riders Carol Fowler, of Granite Shoals, and Cheryl McClelland, of Mansfield, support the plan to divert traffic from I-35 and improve safety.

“Absolutely. It’ll get people off the interstate,” McClelland said.

Jim Pangman, 70, grew up on the East Coast system of toll roads long before moving to San Antonio and said Texas drivers will make due.

“User fees make sense,” Pangman said. “They’re going to need to do something.”

Willingness to pay

Because passenger vehicles pay 15.2 cents per mile and truck drivers pay 58.5 cents per mile, the whole plan relies on travelers and freight companies being willing to pay the toll, said Dillard, the Texas Department of Transportation spokesman.

“Yes, the public would be willing to pay a reasonable toll, and they would be willing to do that to bypass the congestion on I-35,” he said. “And (Cintra-Zachry) are willing to invest a considerable amount of money based on that.”

When the road opens, the master plan anticipates 24,000 drivers will use the new road between Hillsboro and Temple each day. Daily usage may climb to 148,000 by 2060, even as tolls rise above $1 per mile, the report said.

The building company includes Cintra, a Spanish firm, and Zachry, a Texas outfit. Cintra-Zachry is expected to invest $8.8 billion to construct the road and pay another $1.9 billion to the state for the opportunity to build the project. That costs about $3.5 billion more than the project was expected to run two years ago.

The company then will have the rights to the tolls for 50 years, and by then, the road could be generating billions of dollars each year.

The proposed roadway has been one of Gov. Rick Perry’s signature issues, promising to relieve traffic and meet the exploding demand for freight along a corridor serving four of the state’s six largest cities.

Traffic in most sections of Interstate 35 is already at the maximum capacity, and plans to add another lane outside of Waco over the next few years will not meet that demand, traffic experts have said.

All three prominent gubernatorial challengers have fiercely opposed the project, calling it a boondoggle and a catastrophe.

McLennan County commissioners, the Texas Farm Bureau and others have opposed the plan, saying it will swallow thousands of square miles of prime farmland, divide ranches and cut small towns off from nearby cities.

“Texans didn’t get a chance to vote on this, it’s just getting rammed down our throats,” said Rick Wegwerth, leader of the Waco anti-corridor group, DERAIL.

But Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Gabby Garcia said more than 6,000 Texans have weighed in on the proposal already this year, and their suggestions are critical to the review process.

Soliciting more opinion

Ken Roberts, a Texas Department of Transportation spokesman based in Waco, said the agency will solicit more public opinion next year. The current proposed route runs within a 10-mile section of McLennan County, bordering Interstate 35 to the east, and could be wider than a quarter-mile in places.

Due to the long process of buying land for the route, Roberts said he doesn’t think the master plan’s timeline is feasible.

“To say that we’re going to have something operational by 2013 is hardly the case,” Roberts said. “It will not happen overnight.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: attorneygeneral; cintra; cintrazachry; cuespookymusic; gregabbott; lawsuits; masterplan; proprietaryinfo; rail; rickperry; secrets; texas; tollroads; tolls; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; ttc69; tx; txdot; usna; zachry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
State to seek corridor plans from 2 firms

Former partners are competing for the contract to develop segment of Trans-Texas project

By RAD SALLEE

Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

Former business partners are now competing for one of the state's richest construction contracts — development of a transportation corridor between Northeast Texas and the Mexican border, passing near the Houston area.

The Texas Transportation Commission voted Thursday to seek proposals from the two for development of the route designated TTC-69, part of the state's ambitious Trans-Texas Corridor plan.

Projects envisioned for the corridor include a $12 billion toll road running west of U.S. 59, high-speed passenger and freight rail, pipelines and other utilities.

Spanish-owned construction giant Cintra and San Antonio road builder Zachry, which joined forces to win a contract to plan development of TTC-35 along Interstate 35, are competing against each other for the TTC-69 plum.

Combined forces

Joining forces with Zachry are ACS Infrastructure Development of Madrid, Spain; Williams Brothers Construction Co. and Dannenbaum Engineering, both of Houston; and six other team members.

Two other Houston firms, Othon and W.W. Webber LLC, are in the Cintra-led group.

"I find it fascinating that Cintra and Zachry have taken their experience on TTC-35 and each in essence has gone out and recruited and organized their own separate team," said Commissioner John W. Johnson of Houston.

"They are the most experienced in the state of Texas," he said. "The keener the competition, the better off we all are."

"I think you'll see more of that," said Phillip Russell, director of the Texas Department of Transportation turnpike division. "You're going to have cross-pollination."

At the same meeting, Texas Department of Transportation officials for the first time disclosed Cintra-Zachry's Master Development Plan for TTC-35.

Route undetermined

Despite its bulk — 1,600 pages — and the numerous maps included, the master plan does not include the actual route of TTC-35.

TxDOT says that will depend on the same federally required environmental process, including public hearings, as any other road project.

If all the hurdles are jumped, TxDOT says, construction could begin in 2011.

Because the master plan supersedes earlier "conceptual" development and financial plans that TxDOT declined to reveal in March 2005, these were released Thursday as well.

The Houston Chronicle and others had filed open-records requests to see the documents, and Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott agreed they should be released.

TxDOT and Cintra-Zachry then sued Abbott, asking an Austin court to exempt the plans from disclosure on grounds that they would reveal proprietary information, give competitors unfair advantage and have a "chilling effect" on future proposers' willingness to reveal their ideas.

The lawsuit was dismissed Thursday by agreement.

The campaign manager for gubernatorial candidate and state Comptroller Carol Keeton Strayhorn had urged that the plans be made public.

Strayhorn said Gov. Rick Perry had "fought to keep Texans in the dark and his contract with a foreign-owned company to build toll roads across Texas a secret."

Commission Chairman Ric Williamson said the matter was handled the same way as proprietary information from firms seeking other TxDOT work.

$175 billion proposal

Perry announced the corridor plan in 2002, calling for a $175 billion, 4,000-mile limited-access transportation network built mostly with private dollars for profit but owned by the state.

TTC-35 generally would run east of Interstate 35 from Oklahoma to Mexico and would include an $8.8 billion toll road from Oklahoma to San Antonio.

The proposal has received continual criticism, despite efforts by TxDOT to reassure the public.

Farmers and ranchers have expressed concern that their property would be divided or taken by eminent domain.

Some concerns

Local officials feared that the corridor would draw business away from existing routes.

Others were concerned that negotiating a 50-year contract for a project of such size was being done behind the scenes.

Supporters of the corridor concept say gasoline taxes will not be able to fund enough roads to meet future need, but private companies can build and operate them for a profit at no risk to taxpayers.

If a corridor developer defaults on its contract, Williamson said, TxDOT can buy the facility, probably for less than it cost to build, and bid it to another.


Corridor plans are released

Parts could be under construction in 5 years

A rail line looping around the west side of Fort Worth would be under construction no later than 2016, possibly accompanied by a half-circular toll road stretching from Alliance Airport to southwest Fort Worth and Mansfield, a Trans-Texas Corridor master plan unveiled Thursday shows.

The release of the long-awaited financial and development plan comes two years after the Texas Department of Transportation hired a private firm, Cintra Zachry, to alleviate traffic on Interstate 35 over the next 50 years.

For Tarrant County residents, the plan promises less congestion along Interstate 35W, as vehicles -- mainly trucks -- are lured to the Trans-Texas Corridor by speed limits of up to 85 mph and higher load limits. The combination of roads and rail line would form a skeletal structure for eventual development of the Alliance Airport area to the north, southwest Fort Worth and Johnson County to the south.

The 1,600-page document shows a rail line curving west of Fort Worth through Parker and Wise counties. Construction would begin between 2012 and 2016. A parallel toll road would follow sometime between 2017 and 2055.

But there's also the possibility that both the road and rail line could be built sooner and closer to Fort Worth, Cintra Zachry officials say. The private company has notified the Texas Department of Transportation that it would like to begin developing the area, possibly within five years, although a detailed study was not yet ready for the master plan.

The master plan shows a proposed connector road leading roughly from Texas 114 near Texas Motor Speedway to Farm Road 1187 in southwest Fort Worth to Texas 360 in Mansfield.

"It's a living document. We anticipate it will be updated, possibly a couple times per year," said Phil Russell, the Transportation Department's turnpike director.

Overall, the master plan shows the proposed toll road beginning at I-35 on the Oklahoma border, stretching around the east side of Dallas and then running roughly parallel to I-35 east of Waco, Austin and San Antonio.

The master plan offers a detailed analysis of the costs of building the Trans-Texas Corridor, plus detailed projections about how many motorists might use each segment of the 370-mile-long corridor, how much they might pay and how that money would pay for the roads over time.

Among the highlights:

Parts of the toll road -- 260 miles' worth -- would be under construction within five years and open by 2014.

Tolls would be about 15 cents a mile for cars, 59 cents for trucks. At that rate, a 145-mile, one-way trip from south of Mansfield to Austin would be $22 -- or for truckers, $85.

Initially, the roads would be two lanes in each direction, with cars and trucks sharing space. Eventually, the corridor would be expanded to feature two truck-only lanes and three car lanes in each direction. There would also be room for freight and passenger rail, and underground pipes for water, electricity, petroleum and other utility lines.

Total cost of designing and building the corridor would be $8.8 billion, up from previous estimates of $7.2 billion.

Private companies would pay that cost, plus fees totaling $1.9 billion, in exchange for the right to collect tolls for 50 years. The state Transportation Department would use the money on other work.

Railroad companies can't be forced to use new tracks, but more than half of all cargo would likely be diverted to the new corridor, according to Cintra Zachry estimates.

While it's considered a privately funded project, a third of the road construction and design costs -- about $3.2 billion -- would be in the form of federal transportation loans. The federal government would be repaid over 35 years, with interest.

The $3.2 billion would double the number of projects funded by Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loans since Congress created the program in 1998.

"It's a loan program made possible by federal gas taxes paid by everyone in America, including citizens in Texas," Texas Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson of Weatherford said. "Since Texans only get back 70 percent of federal transportation taxes ... we'd be remiss if we missed an opportunity to get that loan."

Cintra Zachry will keep a special relationship with the Transportation Department for years to come. The state paid the company $3.5 million for the master plan, and it awarded Cintra Zachry a $1.4 billion contract to build a portion of the corridor near Austin.

Otherwise, the state has no obligation to hire Cintra Zachry for any other work, but it could award the company part or all of the $8.8 billion project without putting it out to bid.

It's a new way of doing business. In the past, the Transportation Department awarded contracts to the low bidder. Now, a private firm is selected based on the "best value" for the state -- which can include price, but also factors such as ability to work quickly -- to manage the entire project.

Cintra Zachry has already said it wants exclusive rights to build the rail line around Fort Worth, and the outer highway loop around Dallas-Fort Worth.

Even so, officials say, Cintra Zachry has expressed interest all along in sharing the work load for other portions of the Trans-Texas Corridor with other private developers.

Cintra Zachry will also update the master plan, perhaps once or twice a year, for a yet-to-be-set fee.

"We wanted a long-term partner," said Amadeo Saenz, the Transportation Department's assistant director.

With the release of the master plan during Thursday's Texas Transportation Commission meeting, Transportation Department officials say they'll likely release financial documents soon that have been the subject of a freedom of information lawsuit filed by the Texas attorney general's office.

The lawsuit calls for the Transportation Department and Cintra Zachry to release financial and development details for the Trans-Texas Corridor.

Cintra Zachry had argued that the information involved trade secrets, but the release of the master plan likely nullifies that argument.


For more recent articles on the TTC (and there are more) check out:

Google

Dogpile

1 posted on 09/29/2006 6:32:23 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B-Chan; barkeep; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 09/29/2006 6:33:33 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Spanish Company will have to use Eminent Domain laws to steal Americans property!
3 posted on 09/29/2006 6:38:13 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The master plan shows a proposed connector road leading roughly from Texas 114 near Texas Motor Speedway to Farm Road 1187 in southwest Fort Worth to Texas 360 in Mansfield.

Puts my acrage right in the middle...hmmmm.

4 posted on 09/29/2006 6:38:57 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (Those who would bash Osteen/Warren would support HAMAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

15 cents a mile? That's practically free! Only 15 bucks for a hundred miles.

</Sarcasm>

This does not even include the cost of your car nor the gas you put in it, which already has hefty road taxes.

It would be cheaper to fly, literally.


5 posted on 09/29/2006 6:44:13 AM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

........GO KINKY GO.........


6 posted on 09/29/2006 6:45:28 AM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

It would be cheaper to fly, literally.



Yes, but that landing/disembarkment at the 100 mile range maybe a bit rough on the hide, ya reckon?


7 posted on 09/29/2006 6:47:35 AM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: deport

If it's only 100 miles, yes. I was basically thinking cost-per-mile.

It is still prohibitively expensive, when other costs are factored in. Think of it this way. We pay taxes for roads in the price of gas. For those taxes to equal this, if your car gets 30 MPG, they would have to add $4.50 in taxes to a gallon of gas to match this toll.

That is nuts.


8 posted on 09/29/2006 6:53:29 AM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I'll be happy if they finish all the road construction in Austin by 2013.


9 posted on 09/29/2006 6:55:11 AM PDT by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bump


10 posted on 09/29/2006 6:58:10 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


11 posted on 09/29/2006 6:58:53 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Very interesting! This is a debate that we really need to have in this country about where to go with the Intersate System and how to pay for it.

Dwight D. Eisenhower is always credited for creating the Interstate Highway system, and that is true, kind of. The system that Eisenhower envisioned was modeled directly on the German Autobahn system that the Nazis had begun building during WWII. As SAC, Ike got a first hand look at the system and how it helped the Third Reich move troops and supplies around efficiently.

The system in the US, as Ike wanted it, was meant to be able to evacuate American Citizens out of Cities that were prime targets for Soviet nuclear weapons. The original concept for the interstate system called for limited access, high speed roadways, not what we have today with complex interchanges, routes that go directly through the Downtown urban corridors of every major City in the Country, and speeds that slow to a crawl during all day rush hours.

It is also indisputable that new highway projects are horribly expensive, and planning on paying for new roads through tolls is a sound, realistic, and cost effective way to fund things like this.

It seems to me that a lot of traffic problems could be solved, if more locales could come together to fund major new projects that serve large areas. It makes sense to me to examine how to build a high speed, limited access, toll road from The Southern border near San Diego, all the way to the Canadian border in Washington. If you made at least part of it accessible only to high speed, 70 MPH+, Truck Traffic, and charged a fair toll at whatever the market would bear, we could cut the time required to ship goods by truck significantly, immediately reduce the thru-traffic of heavy trucks through urban corridors, and significantly unsnarling some major traffic nightmares. Truck traffic is not going away anytime soon. Nobody has figured out a better way to transport and deliver goods inside of urban areas, so it is prudent to plan for ways to better reduce the thru-traffic of heavy trucks. If you further reduce through traffic by routing thru-traffic away from those same urban areas, the situation during rush hour in places like the I-5 Columbia River crossing between Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA suddenly looks much different, and much more manageable.

As to Foreign investors wanting to underwrite the kind of project you describe, I really don't have a problem with that as long as everything is in accordance with our Laws. Anyone who is willing to shoulder that risk for a project like this, who is not the Federal governmnet, ought to at least get consideration. Let's face it, if they build infrastructure inside of the Continental United States, the sure can't pack it up and move it...

Good articles!
12 posted on 09/29/2006 7:00:28 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
And the current price per gallon [38.5 cents]of taxes we pay won't build new roads at the current rate in Texas [20 cents state and 18.5 cents federal].... so we are stuck with either raising the tax rate, impose some other tax scheme or let some private companies put of the money and recoup their investment via payment from those who choose to ride. Me I like the latter option as opposed to increased taxes. You on the other hand may like to have your taxes raised, your choice.
13 posted on 09/29/2006 7:02:12 AM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.; foreverfree

bump.


14 posted on 09/29/2006 7:07:02 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
15 cents a mile? That's practically free! Only 15 bucks for a hundred miles.

</Sarcasm>

Definitely not the Pennsylvania Turnpike...

15 posted on 09/29/2006 7:11:27 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 100-Fold_Return

That would just utilize an already planned loop highway around the west side of Ft. Worth. If the TTC isn't built, that loop still will be, just not as soon and with taxpayer dollars (higher taxes) instead of with private funds.

You can find some of the master plans for DFW area roads here:

http://www.nctcog.org/trans/maps/index.asp

and here(go to the Transportation topic, which has several subtopics related to future road plans):

http://www.nctcog.org/

Also go to the city of Ft. Worth's website and look up the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which shows the buildout plan for all roads in their ETJ (the area that potentially could become within the city limits.)


16 posted on 09/29/2006 7:45:02 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Probably a poorly written article. From prior articles, the 15 cents per mile figure is actually an agreed maximum rate that could be charged (perhaps subject to renegotiation), but of course if demand doesn't support that it would be lowered to whatever the market will support. Then as demand increases the price would, too.

As to being cheaper to fly, not when you add in the costs of a rent-a-car and the gas used at your destination city.


17 posted on 09/29/2006 7:48:47 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Could we see the Trans-Texas Corridor by 2013?,

Maybe Perry and his advocates of crony capitalism could let us see the contracts by then. 

18 posted on 09/29/2006 7:50:59 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

........GO KINKY GO.........

I voting for Kink....but can he really put the kybosh on this?


19 posted on 09/29/2006 8:03:18 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

I voting for Kink....but can he really put the kybosh on this?



Sure he can...... The Joker will put the kybosh on many things, just ask him. The all powerful governor can reign over the legislature and courts with the stroke of the pen.

Kinky's the man.......


20 posted on 09/29/2006 8:06:55 AM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson