VanHollenForAG.Com
Posted on 09/28/2006 9:42:52 PM PDT by Once-Ler
(Note: This column appears in the Madison weekly Isthmus.)
I’m sorry now that I once said Jim Doyle looks like a cross between a basset hound and Richard Nixon.
It was unfair to the hound and trivializes the Nixonian side of Doyle’s character. Make no mistake, the chilling aspect of last week’s banana republic moment at the state Elections Board was its Nixonian overtones.
“What’s really scary about this,” one business leader told me, “is that we have now have a governor who is willing to use the powers of government to punish political appointees. This time, it’s the Elections Board. Next time, will it be the Department of Revenue? The DNR?”
You probably know the story: In trying to rig a vote of the state Elections Board involving Republican Mark Green, a lawyer for the Doyle campaign laid out the strategy to Democratic appointees. The goal was to embarrass Green by retroactively changing elections rules and forcing him to return more than $400,000 he had transferred from his federal account.
That sort of transfer had been considered legal for 28 years and when former Democratic Congressman Tom Barrett did the same thing, the Elections Board said it was perfectly okay. But the Doyle team, faced with mounting scandals, set out to find some way to accuse Green of being as much of a crook as the governor.
The clock was running. Doyle Administration official Georgia Thompson had been convicted of a felony for rigging a state contract to benefit a contributor to the Doyle campaign. (At her sentencing last week, she got 18 months.) The federal investigation is ongoing and the media continue a steady drip of stories about state contracts with suspicious links to Doyle campaign cash.
And so Doyle’s lawyer, Michael Maistelman, reached out to Election Board members. The board then voted 4-3 (three Democrats joined by a Green Party rep) to ignore the advice of its own lawyer, George Dunst, who had said Green’s transfer should be allowed to stand. It declared the transfer illegal and ordered Green to divest himself of the cash, just two months before the November election.
Almost immediately, Doyle began a television ad barrage attacking Green for his “illegal money.”
That, of course, was the whole point.
In an e-mail the day before the vote, Maistelman advised one Election Board member that “the Gov’s Campaign and the Dem party and others will give you cover on this in the media. Even if this ends up in Court it is a PR victory for us since it makes Green spend money and have to defend the use of his Washington DC dirty money.”
In other words, it wasn’t about the law; it was about using the board’s actions to damage Doyle’s opponent. The language could hardly have been balder.
Other e-mails recount how Maistelman got other appointees “on board” the plan to whack Green. At one point, he assured a supine board member, “I ran this by the powers that be and was given a ‘green’ light on this idea.” The strings had been well and surely pulled; the supposedly independent watchdog had been turned into a plaint lapdog.
Much of the media have taken to calling Maistelman’s involvement “lobbying” the Elections Board. It wasn’t. The lawyer for the Democratic governor was giving marching orders to his party’s appointees, who promptly complied.
This, in itself, is hardly news. In fact, it could be argued that it’s perfectly consistent with the way this governor has done business. But who knew his minions would be so arrogant as to actually put it in writing?
Doyle’s response has been predictable. He denied knowing that Maistelman was his lawyer (yeah, that’s the ticket); seized on a story that a GOP official had also called a member of the Elections Board (apparently to ask, “Is it true the Dems are going to screw Green?”); and has continued to run ads decrying Green’s “dirty money,” while the dispute wends its way through the courts. In other words, the scheme worked exactly as planned.
As collateral damage, the gambit exposed the lawmakers (primarily Republican) who scuttled plans to reform the absurd practice of letting partisan hacks dominate the Elections Board.
But primarily, it gave us a glimpse of the new face of politics in Wisconsin. Doyle defenders have half a point when they note that Doyle did not invent aggressive fundraising or hardball politics, citing his predecessors including Pat Lucey and Tommy Thompson.
What they gloss over, however, is how far Doyle has taken this – from the shakedown of companies bidding for state contracts to the casual cynicism of his political thuggery. It is one thing to use spin to cover deficiencies of substance, but Doyle has turned to outright deception and official bullying to cover up an ethical meltdown.
In 1972, Richard Nixon survived Watergate to win a second term. Doyle may well survive Travelgate and other scandals, but his second term could well turn out to be as eventful as his new role model’s
Tommy Thompson may have run Wisconsin with an iron fist, but at least it was clean - good, hard politics at its best. Doyle, on the other hand, is trying to be Wisconsin's own version of Mayor Daley.
Sykes ping.
The NRA is also calling for the ouster of Doyle. He even made the cover of their magazine.
Federal Investigators are probing corruption in Illinois. WI conservatvies ought to get the Feds to do the same.
Wisconsin used to be a fairly clean state when it came to elections. That's no longer true.
Let me guess, Doyle is flooding the airwaves with ads attacking Green as a corrupt Congresscritter. Doyle's re-election message is "Sure I stuck. But my challenger stucks even more".
Down in IL, my RAT Governor jammed the evening news with his ads blasting his RINO challenger, ad after ad.
Interestingly, both my RAT Governor and yours both have low approval ratings and ethically challenged. Perhaps in the future, they will be prison mates.
That's true. Typically we just elect traitors like Feingold and Victor Berger...not election cheats.
We've got a GOP majority in both state houses...we should be able to win the Gov seat. I don't know why we can't win one US Senate seat or the AG?
No one even runs against Kohl or Feingold. I just don't get it, Wisconsin is a conservative state.
Feingold almost lost in 1998. Feingold beat Mark Neumann, 51-48. Thanks to heavy turnout in Madison.
Boy! Is that ever an understatement. Daley style corruption.
Yep. There are definately enclaves of blue in Wisconsin, but our elections are always really close, even with the amount of 'Rat cheating that goes on. It's consistently tagged as the state that is most evenly split red/blue.
My Bush/Cheney bumper-stickered car was keyed in 2004, too...but that was in Madistan, which is to be expected. *Rolleyes*
The borders of our state are taking a hard hit, and you're right about people coming from other liberal states and buying up land from their deceased Conservative relatives. It's an expensive state to live in; I've lived here or owned homes here all o fmy life and it is going the way of other blue states as far as taxes go and pretty soon only the very rich will be able to afford to live here. I see that as mainly due to general union infiltration of politics and the blue Governors being hogtied to teachers' unions.
But, I'm not ready to throw in the towel. I'm more of a stand and fight kind of gal.
But, as a Conservative and Capitalist, I would suggest you sell your land while you can and make a buck or two off of it. I don't see things changing dramatically this election cycle. We'll hold onto the House and Assembly, but any other offices gained are going to be gravy, IMHO. ;)
"Vote Early, Vote Often" Ping!
They already are. The investigation has already led to the conviction of a "mid-level" employee in Jim "Craps" Doyle's (WEAC/Potawatomi-For Sale) Department of Administration for rigging a state contract so it could be awarded to a Doyle donor.
And the abandonment of Neumann by the "R"PW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.